Previous Page  143 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 143 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

cided that the restoration of the pre-October 1970 rate

of company taxation should be advanced from 1973-74

to this year. The cost of this concession, which reduces

the rate of taxation of company profits to 50 per cent,

will be £2.7 million this year in addition to the sum of

£2.7 million already taken into account in the pre-

budget estimate of tax revenue. When the provision for

free depreciation is taken into account, the over-all tax

position of companies is now, in fact, more favourable

than it was before the October, 1970, increase.

Free depreciation

Last year, as a special measure to encourage a con-

centration of capital investment in the two-pear period

ending 31st March, 1973. I extended free depreciation

to the whole country for that limited period. Represen-

tations have been made to me that the concession cannot

be claimed in cases where, although expenditure has

been incurred, the asset will not be brought into use

before the limiting date. I propose to remedy this in the

Finance Bill.

Death duties relief

I have had under consideration the threshold at which

estate duty becomes payable. The present exemption

limit is £5,000, introduced in 1960. I have decided to

increase it by 50 per cent to £7,500. Furthermore, a new

scale of rates from 1 per cent upwards will operate for

estates between £7,500 and £11,000 so that these estates

will also have their liability to duty reduced. The

exemption limit for legacy and succession duties will

also be raised from £5,000 to £7,500.

When comparing the rates of estate duty chargeable

in this country with those chargeable elsewhere, it is

important that the abatements of estate duty provided

here be taken into account. These abatements provide

considerable relief from duty where that relief is most

needed, that is, in estates which pass to a widow or to a

widow with dependent children. I increased these abate-

ments last year from £1,000 to £1,500 in the case of the

widow and from £500 to £750 in the case of each de-

pendent child.

This is an expensive form of relief. In the last finan-

cial year, it cost more than £650,000 in estate duty.

Nevertheless, I have come to the conclusion that further

relief is called for and have decided to increase the

widow's abatement from £1,500 to £2,000 and the de-

pendent child's abatement from £750 to £1,000. In the

case of a widow without dependants, the effect is to raise

the exemption limit from £15,300 to £17.750; where

there are three dependent children, the new exemption

limit will be £30,200 as compared with £25,250 pre-

viously.

These concessions will cost £130,000 in the present

year and £500,000 in a full year.

Financing the deficit

The tax reliefs which I have announced will cost in all

£14.1 million this year. When added to the social welfare

and other concessions and taking account of the open-

ing gap of £8.6 million, they bring the overall deficit in

the budget to £34.8 million. To finance part of this

deficit I propose to bring into the Exchequer an excep-

tional non-recurring receipt of £7 million from the Cen-

tral Bank.

The balance of the deficit—£27.8 million—will be

financed by borrowing. To the extent that the budgetary

measures give rise to increased economic activity, there

will be a consequential increase in revenue which will

reduce correspondingly the borrowing requirement.

Equal Pay

Before coming to my concluding remarks, there are

two important matters to which I wish to refer.

The first of these is equal pay for women, which the

Government accept in principle and which they now

affirm as a national aim. The second relates to efficiency

in the public service.

The Government have been considering the interim

report on equal pay submitted by the Commission on

the Status of Women. The Employer-Labour Confer-

ence have arranged that the working party established

to negotiate on pay, with a view to reaching a new

National Agreement, will take the recommendations of

the commission into account in these negotiations. The

Government welcome this decision and hope that agree-

ment will result which will be acceptable to all. Pro-

gress on this front depends on the will of the entire

community, whatever general arrangements are accepted

by the conference will be applied to the public service.

The commission also recommended the enactment of

legislation to give effect to their proposals. They sug-

gested that legislation should take into account any

phasing arrangements agreed by the conference. The

Government will, accordingly, consider what specific

action is required in this area in the light of the con-

ference's finding. It is also intended to consider the

question of ending of restrictions on the employment of

women which, by excluding them from equal work with

men, are an automatic barrier to equal pay. It is hoped

that the final report of the commission will be available

when the legislation is peing prepared.

In the meantime, the various restrictions under statute

or regulation which comprise the "marriage-bar" in the

public service are being examined. It is hoped that all

non-statutory restrictions on the employment of married

women will be ended as soon as possible and that the

necessary legislation for the repeal of any statutory re-

strictions and for the prohibition of restrictions on the

employment of married women generally will be enacted

within the period of two years recommended in the

interim report.

Efficiency in the public service

Acceptance of the principal of equal pay will increase

substantially the cost of pay in the public sector.

Foremost among measures to promote efficiency in

the public service I must place the administrative steps,

which are continuing, for the reorganisation of the pub-

lic service. As well as the legislation for the setting up

of the Department of the Public Service, which will, I

expect, be enacted during the current parliamentary

sessions, two other main developments should be men-

tioned.

First, the Report of the Public Services Organisation

Review Group emphasised the great responsibility of the

Government to select the right men for the top posts in

the new Department. The Government have recognised

this by the exceptional arrangement whereby two of the

three posts of Deputy Secretary in the new Department

were filled by a competition open to all comers. I am

satisfied that, in this way, we have got the best available

talent to carry the heavy burden of leading and directing

the reform and reorganisation of our public service

instiutions.

Secondly, the Government have decided to accept, on

an experimental basis, the major administrative reform

recommended by the review group by initiating, in a

number of selected Departments, the separation of

policy and execution and by reshaping them into an

142