Previous Page  229 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 229 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

Commissioners for Oaths

A three-year qualification to be appointed as Commis-

sioner for Oaths is no longer necessary. For many years

the Courts have operated a rule of practice appointing

solicitors as commissioners for oaths by which the appli-

cants were required to have not less than three years in

practice as a condition of eligibility. The Chief Justice

has now reviewed this practice and has decided that it

no longer serves any useful purpose. He has accordingly

indicated that he will in future not require a solicitor-

applicant to be a practising solicitor of not less than

three years standing and has requested that this infor-

mation be brought to the notice of the profession.

Should a Solicitor give an undertaking without

an Irrevocable Retainer by the Client?

The Council have been considering the difficulty in

which a solicitor can find himself when he has given an

undertaking on behalf of a client and the client subse-

quently withdraws his retainer and instructs some other

solicitor. Depending upon the terms of the undertaking

given a solicitor could in certain circumstances find

himself in a position of grave embarrassment. For ex-

ample if a client instructed a solicitor to give an under-

taking to a bank to pay over in discharge of an over-

draft monies coming to his hands belonging to the client

and if the client subsequently terminated the retainer

and called upon the solicitor to account to him for all

further monies coming into his hands or already held

and not paid over in accordance with the undertaking

the solicitor might find himself liable to proceedings

by the former client for the recovery of his money on

the one hand and proceedings by the bank on foot of

his undertaking on the other.

The Council have approved of the following form of

authority and undertaking which a solicitor could use

on being instructed and prior to giving any under-

taking on behalf of the client. The solicitor should

write to the client as follows :

Dear Mr. A. (client),

In order to complete this matter I shall have to give

an undertaking to the bank which will bind me profes-

sionally to (set out the terms of the undertaking).

I must have your authority and retainer both of

which shall be irrevocable in order to give this under-

taking and if you will write that you agree I shall

proceed with the matter immediately.

Yours faithfully,

(Solicitor).

An unconditional affirmative reply in writing from

the client will constitute the necessary authority. The

solicitor would then be in a position, if the client pur-

ported to terminate the retainer, to act according to

the undertaking given to him. The letter in reply from

the client should be stamped with the appropriate

revenue duty. This is £0.50 in the case of a document

under seal. The duty of £0.2^ on agreements under

hand only has been abolished.

Members are advised to refer again to an important

statement regarding undertakings at page 185 of the

June

Gazette.

This deals with other important matters

precedent to the giving of an undertaking, e.g. the

existence of an enforceable contract and what happens

if either party is unable or unwilling to complete and

the provisions which should be included in its under-

taking to provide for such contingencies.

New Court Rules

District Court

The District Court Rules Committee has made new

rules providing for an increase of 25 per cent in the

costs of the former jurisdiction and also providing a

new scale of costs for the extended jurisdiction. Subject

to concurrence by the Minister the new rules will'come

into operation in September 1972. These rules will be

published in full in the November

Gazette.

Circuit Court

New rules providing a scale of six day costs are

already in operation. The general scales of costs for soli-

citors were agreed and were submitted by the rules com-

mittee to the Minister for Justice who signified his con-

currence and returned the rules to the committee.

Agreement as to the rules concerning the rules and

scales of counsels' fees was not reached. The Minister

indicated that he was prepared to sign rules dealing

with solicitors' costs. At the last meeting of the rules

committee the rules relating to solicitors' costs were

considered. The rules as received from the Department

were not signed and the matter was deferred to a meet-

ing to be held in October.

High Court

Agreement was reached between the Society and the

rules committee and the Department of Justice for an

increase of 20 per cent of the present scales. Rules were

made by the committee and submitted to the Minister

for signature. They have not been signed pending dis-

cussion between the Minister and the Society on certain

matters. A meeting to deal with these outstanding mat-

ters will be held in the near future.

Land Registry

The Council were informed that rules giving effect

to an increase of 30 per cent on the costs of voluntary

transfers, applications under Rules 33-35 and costs

under Rules 121 (6) have been made and will take

effect from 2nd October 1972.

- 2 3 3