Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  86 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

FROZEN HEAT

86

Environmental

Methane is a fossil fuel that contributes to greenhouse gases

when burned. In addition, methane is, itself, a greenhouse gas.

The presence of methane in the atmosphere was an important

factor in creating – over geologic timescales – the global atmos-

pheric and temperature conditions that have allowed humans

to flourish. In recent times, however, the scientific consensus is

that both anthropogenic methane and natural methane released

as a result of human activities have helped induce global warm-

ing (IPCC, 2007) and are a concern as the world struggles to

mitigate and adapt to climate change. Although less common

than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (Blasing 2011), methane

is a particularly potent greenhouse gas (Lacies

et al.

1981; Hans-

en

et al.

1988), and relatively small fluctuations in atmospheric

methane concentrations can have a large greenhouse impact.

Methane release from naturally dissociating gas hydrates is

a topic of interest to those studying global climate change

(Reagan and Moridis 2008, 2009). Although research on the

subject has already been reported (Elliott

et al.

2011; Bhat-

tacharyya

et al.

2012), it is currently included in only a few cli-

mate predictions, partly because the magnitude and timing

of geologic emissions are poorly understood and therefore

difficult to build into regional-scale models. Nevertheless,

dissociation of gas hydrate deposits could, in the future, am-

plify warming, increase ocean acidification, and exacerbate

oxygen loss (Zachos

et al.

2005; Biastoch

et al.

2011). From a

global perspective, understanding the triggers and implica-

tions of methane release from destabilized gas hydrates is a

critical knowledge gap that needs to be addressed.

While environmental considerations related to gas hydrates

in nature remain an understudied topic, the environmental

issues related to gas hydrate production would, in many ways,

be quite different. Perhaps the primary difference relates to

issues of scale. For example, when considering gas hydrates

in nature, first-level issues relate to the vast amounts of gas

hydrate distributed widely around Earth, but in relatively low

concentrations. In comparison, commercial exploitation of

gas hydrates would be limited to localized, concentrated de-

posits. The surface area of a typical field development would

be less than 10 square kilometres and production would

likely last less than 25 years. However, the issue of how local-

scale exploitation of gas hydrates might interact with natu-

rally occurring processes would have to be addressed.

A unique environmental challenge facing gas production from

oceanic hydrates would be the disposal of the dissociation-origi-

nating water (Moridis and Reagan 2007a, b). This water, which

would be anoxic, relatively low in salinity, and possibly quite

cold, could have a considerable adverse effect on chemosynthet-

ic communities on the ocean floor if not released higher in the

water column. Another important challenge relates to the burial

depth of many marine gas hydrate deposits. Geohazards like

slope de-stabilization could by induced by extraction activities.

Policy

The policies that shape the future global energy system

will depend on how human societies and decision-makers

prioritize a range of objectives, including climate change

mitigation, energy security, air and water quality, and hu-

man health. The issues that will have to be addressed extend

beyond national borders and beyond short-term time scales.

They include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Environmental issues and safeguards;

• Socio-economic issues and opportunities; and

• Policy development at the national, multinational, and

international levels.

One argument that is advanced in support of developing natu-

ral gas hydrates as an energy source is that they are relatively

Photo: Geological Survey of Canada