Previous Page  31 / 142 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 142 Next Page
Page Background

DECEMBER, 1927]

The Gazette of the Incorporated'"katf Society or Ireland.

handsomely--and even generously—towards

us. The new building, which will be for the

exclusive use of our Society, will amply

provide for all our requirements, and will

include a fine hall and library, lecture hall,

consultation rooms, offices and all other

necessary accommodation. The Ministry of

Finance not only sanctioned the employment

by the Council of an Architect to advise on

the plans and generally to watch the progress

of the building in the interest of the Society,

but also agreed to pay his fees.

Death of Mr. Kevin O'Higgins.

In common with nearly every public body

and representative association in Ireland,

your Council passed a special resolution

strongly condemnatory of the vile outrage

which deprived our country of the services

of a great statesman and patriotic Irishman :

I refer to the foul murder of Mr. Kevin

O'Higgins. His death particularly affected

your Council, because as Minister of Justice

he was frequently in communication with

them, both verbally and in writing, and they

always found him most courteous and willing

to consider any representations made by the

Coimcil relating to the administration of

justice.

Courts of Justice Act, 1927.

I am glad to say that the representations

made by your Council

to

the Ministry,

strongly urging the necessity of continuing

the power to appoint temporary assistant

judges to dispose of the accumulation of

business in some of the Circuit Courts, proved

successful, and resulted in the passing of the

Courts of. Justice Act,, 1927, which provides

for an extension by nine months of the time

limited by the Act of 1924, during which the

Minister for Justice had power to appoint

temporary assistant Circuit Court Judges.

The appointment of Mr. Bernard Roche as

Assistant Judge in Dublin met with general

approval by the legal profession.

High Court Rules.

In my address to the Half-yearly Meeting

in May last I referred to the confusion,

annoyance and loss, not only to the legal

profession but also to the public, caused by

the provisions of the old Order XV., Rules

1 and 2, which required an affidavit showing

that.the plaintiff:.was entitled to the,-relief

sought should be served together with-the

Originating Summons, and to the decision of

Mr. Justice Hanna, the effect of which..was

that the affidavit required to be. sworn byithe

plaintiff under Order XV. was a plenary

affidavit, the same as was required for a Final

Judgment Motion under the

previous. Rules.

I will not refer to this matter

furthertfjan.to

acknowledge the promptness

with,.w.hichi. the

Rules Committee acted on the representations

of your Council and framed the new Rules,

satisfactorily settling the practice.

Circuit Court Rules.

The Report before "you contains a state

ment of the present position with regard to

the Circuit Court Rules. You will see that

your Council have done their part and finally

approved of the, draft.

I understand that

they are being held up on account, of some

points in relation to the question of Counsels'

fees, and as the Government have,.noyv

adjourned

t

for a two months', holiclay, the

Rules will 'not come into operation.until, well

into the New Year.. This is. .much. fib.. |b;e

regretted, as

the delay is causing mud}

inconvenience to the profession.

,v

District Court Rules.

,

Representations were made to your Council,

by practitioners in country districts that .i;t

was difficult in some cases to have affidavits,

for use in the District Courts sworn before a

Commissioner for Affidavits -without making

long journeys. Your Council drew attention

to this matter, and they suggest that it

should be; so arranged that these affidavits

might be sworn before a Ppace, C'o.runiissipjaer.

..<

••

•-•.-.J

-.-fii ni aJnrafn

Circuit Court:Appeals.,, ),,,;, ,( m;iq

In May last I spoke at some length on the,

subject of Circuit Court Appeals. Amongst:

the objections to the new system, I mentioned

the following :—

,/

" That the initial hearing of the Civil'

Bill by the Circuit Court Judge now

occupied far more time,. to enable the

stenographer to take a note of the evidence^'

that no shorthand writer, no matter how

proficient nv his art, could take a' full'and:

accurate ;note of all the evidende, .partis

cularly

the:- oross^examination --of

the

witnesses •

that the Judges, hearing: the