Previous Page  73 / 142 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 142 Next Page
Page Background

DECEMBER, 1928}

the Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society M Ireland.

During the year two important decisions

were given, which established the fact that

the procedure adopted in the Master's Court

was not in accordance with the Rules. I refer

to the decision in the case of " Roe v.

McMullen," mentioned in the Report, and

also to the case of " Stokes and Wilkie."

As will be seen by the Report, it was held

in the former case that certain Orders had

been made by the Master in excess of his

jurisdiction. Your Council took the matter

up at once, and joined in a deputation to

the Minister for Justice, as a result of which

the Courts of Justice Act, 1928, which has

become law, contains a clause dealing with

the difficulty that had arisen, and this,

I think, should be regarded as satisfactory.

The second decision, that in the case of

" Stokes and Wilkie," made it clear that the

system of marking judgment by default in

the High Court was wrong. Representations

were made, as a result of which a formal

hearing is now held by the Master in each

case, and a Bill has been introduced in the

Dail to validate the judgments obtained, and

to prevent proceedings being taken in regard

to them.

It is hoped that this Bill will soon

become law, and the unsatisfactory position

at present existing will be remedied.

It will

be to the advantage of litigants if the Rules

are amended to provide for a more simple

procedure for obtaining judgments analogous

to the old system.

Bodies Corporate Bill.

It is a matter of great satisfaction to your

Council that the amendment to the Bodies

Corporate Bill put forward by them was

adopted. Your Council viewed with con

siderable apprehension the absence from the

Bill, as originally drafted, of any provision

fixing a minimum capital for the Bodies

entitled to act under the terms of the Bill.

The amendment was drafted solely for the

protection of the public.

Circuit Court Rules.

Since I last addressed you the Circuit

Court Rules were before the Dail. They

were referred to a Joint Committee of both

Houses, who have reported, and I think we

may regard these Rules as having been

finally

rejected.

Great

inconvenience

is

being caused by the absence of Rules.

I am

unable to say the exact position with regard,

to these Rules, but I know that the Report

of the Committee has not been considered by

the Dail. The incoming Council will, I am

sure, press for the making of Rules as soon

as possible.

Bankruptcy and Companies.

The Committee

to

inquire

into

the

Bankruptcy Law and winding-up of com

panies has continued its sittings. An interim

report dealing with the Bankruptcy Laws

alone has been issued, and I think that the

recommendations of

the Committee are

generally approved of.

The evidence

in

connection with the Companies Acts has been

taken, and recommendations under

this

branch of the inquiry will soon be considered.

Examiner's Office.

At the May meeting I referred to the

delays in the Examiner's Office, about which

complaints had been made, when I stated

that I was satisfied that any delays that

occurred were due to insufficiency of staff.

It will be noted that the Minister for Justice

stated in the Dail, in response to inquiries

on the subject, that steps were being taken

to appoint additional staff, and I have also

received assurances in this direction.

I trust

that

this will

enable

the work

to be

expeditiously dealt with.

Legal Practitioners (Qualification) Bill.

I am sure most of you are familiar with

the Bill lately introduced in the Dail to make

the knowledge of Irish necessary for any

candidate for admission to our profession.

The Law Society are entrusted with the duty

of seeing that no person is admitted to the

profession who

is not fully qualified by

general education and legal knowledge. At

our

Preliminary Examination

intending

apprentices have to satisfy the Society that

they have received an education of a high

standard.

Having passed that test

the

Society's next duty is to provide adequate

legal education, and lectures are given for

this purpose by the Society's Professors.

Two further examinations have to be passed :

the Intermediate, in the theory and practice

of law and in book-keeping ;

and the Final,

in the theory and practice of law. The Bill,

which passed the second reading recently in