Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  59 / 98 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 98 Next Page
Page Background

March 16, 2015 SPSFAM Meeting

Meeting Minutes v2

15 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention. The motion passed.

Konings advised that the next step will be a call for methods purporting to meet this SMPR. Konings

reminded the group that the original Fitness for Purpose statement for this group asked for them to

start with Arsenic, but also consider Mercury and Chromium, and asked the group if there was still a

need for developing SMPRs for the other metals. The group agreed that chromium speciation

should be pursued, but mercury speciation is no longer needed. Smith agreed to continue his

chairmanship of the Heavy Metal Speciation Working Group. AOAC will schedule a working group

meeting for this group to pursue chromium speciation.

IV.

Heavy Metals Expert Review Panel Updates

Konings introduced Reba, Chair of the SPSFAM Heavy Metals Expert Review Panel (ERP). Reba

explained that six (6) methods were submitted for ERP consideration against the AOAC SMPR

2012.007,

Standard Method Performance Requirements for Heavy Metals in a Variety of Foods and

Beverage

s 3

.

Two of these methods were moved forward with recommended improvements and

one made it to the final round of ERP discussions. Final revisions were made and in February there

was consensus that it would come to Official First Action Methods of Analysis status as method

number 2015.001. Konings asked if there has been any discussion on how the method will make it

to final action in terms of data requirements, and Reba replied that some members of the ERP have

volunteered to do a mini collaborative study to collect reproducibility data for Final Action

assessment.

V.

Validation Guidelines for Non Targeted Testing

Konings highlighted the issue of validation guidelines for non-targeted testing as another issue that

SPSFAM has expressed interest in pursuing in the past. He explained that U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP)

is currently working on these types of guidelines. Harnly is on that USP Working Group and

explained that USP began this effort over nine (9) months ago and that there is not presently any

need for AOAC to pursue the topic concurrently. Holroyd, also on the USP Working Group,

volunteered to provide an update on this initiative at the next AOAC Annual Meeting. AOAC will

request an update for the agenda for the September 2015 SPSFAM meeting.

VI.

Microbiology / Fast Methods

Konings introduced ISPAM Chair Crowley to provide SPSFAM with an update on ISPAM’s

microbiological projects. Crowley provided a presentation.

4

Crowley advised that ISPAM has

approved AOAC SMPR 2014.017,

Detection of Salmonella in Romaine Lettuce and Baby Spinach

and

explained that two other initiatives are currently in progress: a fresh produce sampling plan and an

effort to harmonize USA and ISO Salmonella methods. ISPAM is also exploring the possibility of

creating standards in the field of food-borne viruses. One potential area of crossover between

ISPAM and SPSFAM may be the development of Rapid Methods (same shift tests and rapid

3

http://www.aoac.org/imis15_prod/AOAC_Docs/SPSFAM/ERP_071113/SMPR_2012_007.pdf

4

Attachment 3: Crowley Presentation