MINING FOR CLOSURE
V
preface
In the debate on what role the environment plays
in causing or resolving conflict, the partnership of
international organizations working on the “Envi-
ronment and Security” initiative takes a pragmatic
position. We focus on participatory assessments
and targeted follow-up activities in conflict-prone
areas and believe that we can help communicate to
achieve environmentally sound development and
peace on the ground.
Conducting assessments of transboundary envi-
ronmental risks in Central Asia, the Caucasus and
South Eastern Europe we have concluded that min-
ing both in terms of legacies and future planning
needs special attention. Environmental protection,
human health risks, competition for land have in-
creasingly to be taken into consideration in mining
regulation and practice. Positive trends are visible:
project planning and conduct of mine operations
to facilitate environmentally and socially acceptable
closure have evolved significantly in recent years.
In this context, we are happy to present the EN-
VSEC publication:
“Mining for Closure – Policies and
guidelines for sustainable mining practice and closure
of mines”
. It is intended as a checklist and guide-
book on “best practices” related to mining, useful
for an audience far beyond the mining industry, in-
cluding government, NGOs, international organi-
zations and the general public.
“Mining for Closure”
was first presented to a broader
group of experts and politicians in a sub-regional
Ministerial Conference, in Cluj Napoca, Romania
in May 2005. The participants welcomed and en-
dorsed the report as “a guide and checklist for re-
ducing and mitigating the environmental, health
and security risks from mining practices” in the
‘Cluj Declaration’ issued at the conference.
We see in
“Mining for Closure”
something like a re-
cipie for stimulating debate and public accountabil-
ity of mining legacies and operations. Through ap-
plying the basic principles and guidelines, not only
mining will become environmentally and socially
more sustainable, it may also result in more de-
mocracy, increased wellbeing and security of those
directly and indirectly affected.
Frits Schlingemann
Ben Slay
Bernard Snoy
Chris DeWispelaere
Director and Regional Representative, UNEP Regional Office for Europe
Director, UNDP Bratislava Regional Office
Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
Director, NATO Security Through Science Programme