Background Image
Previous Page  82 / 100 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 100 Next Page
Page Background www.read-tpt.com

80

J

uly

2014

Global Marketplace

The Middle East and Africa accounted for 9 per cent of

shipments last year, up from 5.2 per cent in 2007.

Europe’s share fell to 16.6 per cent in 2013 from 24.9 per cent

in 2007. Possible contributing factors include the availability

of high-speed rail service on medium-length routes.

In the Asia-Pacific region, transport ministers from 21

countries are working to ease the way for business aviation,

which is often hampered by strict bureaucratic rules and – in

many cases – by military control of national airspace.

Steel

Steel demand is poised for

recovery in the euro zone and

the US, but weakening demand in

China will postpone the rewards

The World Steel Association (“worldsteel”), which on 9

April released its outlook for steel demand, sees a global

weakening in demand through the end of 2014.

What demand there is will be driven by recovery in developed

markets – mainly the European Union and the United States

– even as a slowdown in China, the world’s second-largest

economy, will keep steel pricing under pressure.

The Brussels-based international trade body for the iron and

steel industry expects global steel demand to increase by

3.1 per cent in 2014 and again by 3.3 per cent in 2015, as

compared with growth of 3.6 per cent in 2013.

Steel demand in China is expected to grow just 3 per cent

this year (down from 6.1 per cent in 2013), and to decelerate

to 2.7 per cent in 2015 as the Chinese continue re-balancing

their economy to favour consumption over investment.

The picture is brighter in the euro zone and the US: worldsteel

expects steel demand in the EU to grow by 3.1 per cent in

2014 and 3 per cent in 2015; and, in the US, by 4 per cent

this year and 3.7 per cent in 2015. But the slowdown in China

has meant that companies like AK Steel (West Chester, Ohio)

and US Steel (Pittsburgh) have not been able to turn the likely

recovery to account.

American steel companies also are experiencing continued

pressure from cheap imports, especially from China. As well

as the severe North American winter, Nucor (Charlotte, North

Carolina) cited the negative impact of imports on pricing and

margins at its bar and sheet mills as a factor in the company’s

disappointing first-quarter results. And prospects seem dim

for a tapering-off in the Chinese material any time soon.

As noted by Varun Chandan Arora of the investment letter

Motley Fool

(11 April), Chinese stimulus measures in the

form of infrastructure investment could boost domestic demand

for steel, putting the brakes on exports. But Beijing shows no

such inclination, despite clear signs that the Chinese economy

is slowing down. Even after the release of weak trade data for

March, showing a drop in both imports and exports, China’s

premier Li Keqiang ruled out all but a few inconsequential

“mini-stimulus” measures.

Elsewhere in steel . . .

The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) on 26 March

hailed a decision by a World Trade Organization (WTO)

dispute settlement panel upholding a US challenge to China’s

restrictions on exports of rare earth elements, tungsten and

molybdenum. Joined by Japan and the European Union, the

US in 2012 called the Chinese export quotas into question

after they were cut by about 40 per cent.

AISI president and CEO Thomas J Gibson said of the

WTO decision, “[It] illustrates that China cannot continue

to manipulate the global trading system by promoting

its own industry to the detriment of US and other global

manufacturers. These metals include critical raw materials

for steelmaking, and the export restrictions clearly favour

Chinese producers already dealing with a massive

overcapacity in steelmaking.”

Tungsten and molybdenum are strengthening elements in a

number of steel products. Rare earths, used in automobiles

and wind turbines, are mined almost exclusively in China.

Trade

Seeking tighter ties with the

European Union, China finds EU

business groups more receptive

than national governments

“Mr Xi’s call will be seen as a bid to build a rival to a mooted

EU-US pact and other significant trade negotiations now

under way around the world, the vast majority of which have

left China on the sidelines.”

Mr Xi is, of course, Chinese President Xi Jinping, whose call

was for the European Union and China to actively explore a

broad trade agreement. This would, he said in a speech in

Bruges on 1 April, make the pair “the twin engines for global

economic growth.”

As reported in the

Financial Times

(London), Mr Xi was in

Belgium in the course of an 11-day “charm offensive” that

included visits to France, Germany and the Netherlands

likewise intended to promote his country’s trade ties with

the European Union. US President Barack Obama, on a

similar mission, had made a much briefer trip to Europe

in the previous week. (“China Courts EU on Bilateral Trade

Agreement,” 1 April)

In terms of effort expended, Mr Xi – who promoted a goal of

annual bilateral trade of $1 trillion by 2020 – was the more

earnest suitor. But his reminder to the Europeans that,

together, they and the Chinese “make up one-third of the