![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0361.jpg)
GAZETTE
B
K
W
NOVEMBER 1992
Case Law of the European
Court of Human Rights,
volume II 1988-1990. By Vincent
Berger, [xiv + 291 pp, Dublin. The
Round Hall Press, 1992, IR£37.50.]
In the spacious domain of
constitutional jurisprudence, the
European Court of Human Rights
holds a special place. In the litigious
make-up of the Irish, there is a deep
respect for the courts associated with
the European Communities and the
Council of Europe. However, in
particular, the European Court of
Human Rights is regarded by many
today as one of the principal
moulders of the liberal faith. The
casebook of Dr. Berger, Head of
Division at the Registry of the
European Court of Human Rights
and Professor at the College of
Europe at Bruges, is a testament to
the success of the first international
court of fundamental rights.
The executive branch of government
in Ireland should be reminded that
prior to the signing of the European
Convention on Human Rights in
Rome on November 4, 1950, the
Irish representatives in the
Committee of Ministers and in the
Consultative Assembly of the
Council of Europe had been
prominent in urging that the present
Convention did not go far enough in
protecting human rights and
fundamental freedoms. [See File
S. 14921A, Department of the
Taoiseach, National Archives,
Dublin]. In a memorandum for the
Government, the Department of
External Affairs in April, 1951 stated
that the Attorney General was of the
opinion that if a citizen obtained on
recourse to the Commission or the
Court some relief which was denied
by our Courts, the prerogative of
mercy or executive action of the like
kind would be available to give effect
to any compromise arrived at before
the Commission or to any ruling of
the Court. The memorandum for the
Government was quite optimistic in
stating that the Irish would have no
need to have recourse to the
Convention:
"[T]he likelihood of this country
being brought before the Commission
or the Court is very remote, as all the
'rights' set out in the Convention are
already conceded here. Furthermore, it
is to be noted that the Convention
itself qualifies such rights by
restrictions of a far-reaching nature".
[See Memorandum for Government
dated April 6, 1951 in File S.14921A,
Department of the Taoiseach,
National Archives, Dublin].
Dr. Berger provides summaries of
the seventy-two decisions handed
down by the Court in the three-year
period covered in this volume. Judge
Walsh, judge of the European Court
of Human Rights, has written the
foreword to the book. The author
and Judge Walsh note the ever-
increasing case load of the Court.
The cases in the present volume
relate to many diverse aspects of
fundamental rights including
freedom of expression, freedom of
religion, freedom of religious
observance and freedom to
demonstrate. The
Norris
case
concerning the Irish legislation which
penalises certain homosexual acts
carried out in private between
consenting adult males is also
included. Executive action is still
awaited in relation to this case which
involved a breach of Article 8 of the
Convention (respect for private life).
A useful addition to the book is a
summary bibliography at the end of
each case. There is also a general
bibliography. The text of the
Convention and the various
Protocols are also set out in an
appendix.
Dr. Berger has provided a
magnificent service to lawyers in
presenting in a succinct manner the
summaries of the decisions handed
down by the Court betwen 1988 and
1990. Without human rights and
fundamental freedoms, civilisation
dies. Lawyers should ensure that
rights are not lost through any form
of neglect on their part. Dr. Berger's
book is highly recommended.
Eamonn G. Hall
Harmonisation of Trade Mark
Laws in the European
Communities
Published by the European
Communities Trade Mark
Practitioners' Association, 1991,
127pp. £20.
The report is the seventh in the
series of reports of conferences
organised by the European
Commjunities TVade Mark
Practitioners' Association (ECTA).
These conferences take as their
theme a particular aspect of trade
mark law or practice. The Report
relates to a conference held in
Dublin in May, 1990. The theme of
the Conference was harmonisation of
trade mark laws in the European
Communities. It consists of the
papers read at the Conference by
various trade mark practitioners in
the EC and an official of the
European Commission.
There is a fairly comprehensive
review by the Commission official of
the history of the First Council
Directive of the 21 December, 1988
to approximate the laws of Member
States relating to trade marks ( " The
Directive"). There follows a paper
concerning certain aspects of Article
5 of the Directive and papers from
trade mark practitioners from the
UK, Spain, France, Denmark,
Germany and Italy who outline
progress in their respective
(Cont'd on page 346)
344