Previous Page  429 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 429 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

- (Continued from page 403)

different culture a nd ma y be to

acquire an a d d i t i o n al l a n g u a ge skill.

T h e degree, particularly if d o ne on a

full-time basis, is expensive.

Ap p l i c a n ts s h o u ld b u d g et £7,000 to

£10,000 o n fees a l o ne a nd there will

also be living expenses. T h e loss of a

year's salary is the biggest cost.

Ma n y p a r t i c i p a n ts take o ut a b a nk

l o a n. For Irish solicitors there is also

the possibility of o b t a i n i ng a

scholarship t h r o u gh the Law

Society's " J P O'Reilly Memo r i al

F u n d " .

T h e degree s h o u ld not be u n d e r t a k en

with unrealistic expectations.

Comp l e t i on of the course does not

d o u b le o n e 's salary, it may not even

increase it in the current recessionary

e n v i r o nme n t. T h e p a y b a ck is in the

long t e rm. Mo re impo r t a n t l y, f i n d i ng

a j o b as g o od as or better t h an the

o ne left b e h i nd to d o a full-time

course might not be easy. T h e j o b

p l a c eme nt rate f r om the t op UK

Business Sc hoo ls this year h as been

slow a nd in s ome cases

d i s a p p o i n t i n g.

Wi th ever increasing c omp e t i t i on

f r om within a n d w i t h o ut the

profession, o b t a i n i ng an MBA

degree, by whatever me t h o d, should

better e q u ip a solicitor for the years

a h e a d. P u r s u i ng the degree will

certainly b r o a d en a p a r t i c i p a n t 's

h o r i z o n s. T h e answer to wh e t h er the

q u a l i f i c a t i on is wo r th the cost a nd

e f f o rt involved h as to be based u p on

a solicitor's individual assessment of

his or her situation a n d amb i t i o n s.

Richard Deveueux qualified as a

Solicitor in Dublin in 1985. He was

last year's recipient of the J P

O'Reilly Scholarship and he recently

completed a full-time one year MBA

course at Strathclyde Graduate

Business School in Glasgow,

Scotland.

Applications for the 1993/1994 J. P.

O'Reilly Scholarship should be

submitted to the Law Society by 8

January, 1993. Details and

application forms are available from

Emily Francis

or

Sharon Hanson

at

the Law School

(01-710711).

Book Reviews

there are however a significant

n umb er of topics where recent

English legislation is being c o n s t r u ed

by the c o u r ts a nd t ho se p o r t i o ns of

the work which deal with t ho se areas

are of less value to the Irish

practitioner.

T h e sections on E u r o p e an

C o mm u n i ty law a nd on criminal law

are p r o b a b ly of mo st interest to the

Irish practitioner.

T h e b o ok is well laid o ut with

c omp r e h e n s i ve tables of cases a nd

statutes a nd the readability level of

the articles is high.

John F. Buckley

The New Product Liability

Regime and Annotation of the

Liability for Defective

Products Act, 1991

Edited by Alex Schuster, Irish Ce n t re

for E u r o p e an Law, 1992, 96pp,

p a p e r b a c k, IR£12 (memb e r s) IR£16

( n on memb e r s ).

T h e B r o o k i n gs Institution in the

Un i t ed States, in a study entitled the

" T h e P r o d u ct Liability Ma z e ", h as

s h own t h at the current system of

p r o d u ct liability law in the Un i t ed

States h as kept g o od p r o d u c ts o ff

the ma r k e t, because ma n u f a c t u r e rs

are a f r a id to take the legal risks.

Studies also show t h at research on

new p r o d u c ts such as an A I DS

prevention vaccine h as been inhibited

by the product-liability system.

Further, Ame r i c a 's p r o d u ct liability

system h as generated u n n e c e s s a ry

legal costs.

T h e US Federal P r o d u ct Liability

Fairness Bill struggled for a d e c a de

to be h e a rd a n d finally reached the

Senate f l o or in S e p t emb er 1992. T h e

r e f o rme rs urged t h at a single,

n a t i o n al s t a n d a rd for p r o d u ct

liability would bring sanity to a

r u n away legal system. However, the

US Senate killed product-liability

r e f o rm in m i d - S e p t emb er 1992 in

wh at was described as a c l i f f h a n g er

vote. R e f o rm s u p p o r t e rs vowed t h at

they would try again next year.

Ireland is in the f o r t u n a te position

( hop e f u l l y) of having r e f o rmed its

p r o d u ct liability law in the f o rm of

the

Liability for Defective Products

Act, 1991.

Alex Schuster, the editor

of the b o ok u n d er review, notes t h at

the

Liability for Defective Products

Act, 1991

owes little to the creative

instincts of the denizens of the Dail

or S e a n a d. He states the new

legislation is mainly the p r o d u ct of

I r e l a n d 's o f f s h o re legislature, the

Co u n c il of Ministers of the

E u r o p e an Commu n i t y. However, we

should n o te t h at Ireland is a h e ad of

the Un i t ed States with its r e f o rm.

This b o ok c o n t a i ns p a p e rs delivered

at a c o n f e r e n ce designed to explain

the implications of the law on

liability for defective p r odu c t s.

Alex

Schuster

in his p a p er assesses b o th

the provisions of the new legislation

a n d the extent to which they would

fit within the f r amewo rk of the

c o mm o n law. P r o f e s s or

Bryan

McMahon

examines s ome of the

practical p r o b l ems generated by the

new legislation.

Rolald Rowell,

the

Legal Services Director of Law

La b o r a t o r i es Limited, o f f e rs advice

to p r o d u c e rs as how best to exercise

control over their ma n u f a c t u r i ng

o p e r a t i o n s.

Jim O'Mahoney

c on c e n t r a t es in his p a p er on the

insurance implications of the new

regime.

Maurice Healy,

the Director

of the Na t i o n al C o n s um er Co u n c i l,

o f f e rs a c o n s umer perspective.

William Fagan,

the Director of

C o n s um er Af f a i r s, writes on the

implications of p r o d u ct liability for

business.

Gerard Sheedy

of the

Co n f e d e r a t i on of Irish I n d u s t ry a nd

Ewing Paterson

also write briefly on

the new regime.

T h e b o o k c o n t a i ns the a n n o t a t ed

text of the

Liability for Defective

Products Act, 1991

together with the

P r o d u ct Liability EC Co u n c il

Directive of July 25, 1985.

The Irish Centre for Eu r o p e an law

and Alex Schuster have provided a

practical vade-mecum for lawyers a nd

students. This is indeed welcome.

Eamonn G. Hall

405