Previous Page  426 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 426 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1992

defences. They could have said " l o ok

at the wording of this clause (Article

40.3.3) ' The State acknowledges . . .

a nd guarantees by its law . . ' We are

not the State. Wh a t we are doing -

disseminating i n f o rma t i on on

Í travelling to En g l a nd - c a n n ot

conceivably be regarded as a f o rm of

State activity. You have got the wr o ng

defendants. T he constitutional duty

clearly is on the State a nd it is on it

to introduce a p p r o p r i a te laws to

protect the u n b o r n ".

Mr. Forde said t h at it h a d never

been suggested by the c o u r ts t h at the

article of the Co n s t i t u t i on on

equality applied to private as well as

public a c t i o n, but the case for such

an a p p l i c a t i on was mu ch stronger.

For unlike the a b o r t i on article, the

equality clause was not expressed in

t e rms of " t h e State shall". If there

was to be consistency in o ur

Co n s t i t u t i o n al Law then p e r h a ps sex

d i s c r imi n a t i on t h r o u g h o ut the private

sector was u n c o n s t i t u t i o n al a n d rules

which p u r p o r t ed to exclude women

f r om a variety of bodies a nd

associations were null a n d void a nd

p e r h a ps even actionable. Co u ld we

now expect the courts, he q u e r i e d, to

vindicate the right to equality, for

example, whenever a liquor licence

a p p l i c a t i on was being h e a rd or

p l a n n i ng p e rmi s s i on was being

s o u g ht by a me n - o n ly b o d y? O r

would a state action principle be

applied to the equality article? If

t h at were so, why s h o u ld the

a b o r t i on article by any d i f f e r e n t?

" D o e s Ireland need a new

C o n s t i t u t i o n ?" was the t h eme of a

lively a nd witty d e b a te chaired by

Ms. Justice

Susan Denham,

d u r i ng

the a f t e r n o on session of the

Co n f e r e n c e.

Ar g u i ng for the mo t i o n,

Michael

McDowell,

SC, said t h at it s h o u ld be

possible to emb o dy the necessary

m i n i mum p r o t e c t i ons in a

c o n s t i t u t i on w i t h o ut the

"me t a p h y s i c al a nd ideological

b a g g a g e" c o n t a i n ed in the 1937

Co n s t i t u t i o n. " I d e o l o g i c al

c o n t i n e n ce is possible", he asserted.

It wo u ld be entirely feasible to put

in place a new c o n s t i t u t i on which

s h o u ld be b a l a n c ed a nd inclusive, he

said. His c o - p r o p o n e nt of the

mo t i o n,

Felix McEnroy,

BL, said

t h at the wh o le t h i n k i ng b e h i nd the

1937 Co n s t i t u t i on h ad been an

a t t empt to nail d own certain

principles on which it h ad been felt

the j u d i c i a ry a nd legislature could

not be t r u s t e d. Article 41 was a

" m o r a l d i n o s a u r" he stated, a n d its

message to the women of Ireland

was a simple one: " g o h ome girls".

He said there h a d been a d i s t u r b i ng

d e v e l o pme nt in recent times where

specific interest g r o u ps h ad decided

to use the Co n s t i t u t i on as a me a ns

of e n f o r c i ng their views a b o ut wh at

was g o od for everyone. He said the

wh o le " c o p p e r f a s t e n e d" mentality

a mo u n t ed to a " t e mp l a te of t e r r o r"

by which o ur f u n d a m e n t al d o c um e nt

would be used as a sword by p ro life

g r o u ps rather t h an a shield to

protect f u n d a m e n t al rights.

Op p o s i ng the mo t i o n,

Nial Fennelly,

SC, said that the constitutional

interpretation over half a century by

judges of all persuasions h ad ma de a

living d o c ume nt of the Con s t i t u t i on.

T h e Con s t i t u t i on should not be

regarded as a suit of clothes to

c h a n ge when fashions change. Rather,

it was a suit of clothes which h ad

served the Irish people well, it did

not fit t oo tightly a nd it was large

e n o u gh for people to grow into. It

h ad been the i n s t r ume nt which h ad

achieved the development of h um an

rights a nd he did not think the Irish

people wanted to be told by their

lawyers that they should jettison this

tradition a nd all that h ad been

achieved u n d er the Co n s t i t u t i o n.

Despite massive social c h a n ge in

Ireland since 1937, the p r e d om i n a nt

e t h os in society was still Ch r i s t i an

a n d d emo c r a t ic said

Shane Murphy,

BL, also a r gu i ng against the mo t i o n.

He said it was a p o p u l ar

m i s c o n c e p t i on t h at in 1937 De Valera

h ad given the Ch u r ch wh at it

wa n t e d, a Ca t h o l ic Co n s t i t u t i o n. In

fact, the issue h ad been wh e t h er it

was possible to express ma j o r i ty

principles w i t h o ut o f f e n d i ng

minorities. It was possible to d o so

a n d the 1937 c o n s t i t u t i on h a d proved

this. He said a p a r a n o id fixation

a b o ut the events of 1937 i n f u s ed the

a r g ume n ts of the p r o p o n e n ts of the

motion, but it was clear that the

courts had interpreted the

Constitution in a ma n n er which could

be seen to be independent. He said

interpretation was the basis on which

life could be given to this do c ume nt

to make it capable of living beyond

this generation and into future

generations. "We have the basis for

organic growth, not a vehicle for

social engineering," he stated.

T h e mo t i on wh en put to a vote, was

d e f e a t e d.

Disciplinary

Committee

(Continued from page 399)

n a me removed f r om the Roll of

Solicitors at least three mo n t hs in

a d v a n ce of being called to the Bar.

Du r i ng the year, Mr.

G rattan

Roberts,

Mr.

Michael Hogan

a nd

Mr.

Donal Kelliher

were r e - a p p o i n t ed

to the C omm i t t ee by the President of

the H i gh C o u rt for a n o t h er period

of five years.

I would like to record my t h a n ks to

the memb e rs of the C omm i t t ee for

their h a rd work a nd s u p p o rt d u r i ng

the past year.

Mary Lynch,

the Clerk

to the Comm i t t e e, h as dealt with its

a f f a i rs in a mo st efficient a nd

c omp e t e nt ma n n e r. We are indeed

grateful to her.

Da t ed this 20th day of No v emb er

1992.

Walter Beatty, Chairman

A list of the members of the

Disciplinary Committee appointed by

the President of the High Court

appears on page 377.

Lawyers

Desk Diary

1993

Page - a - Day A4

Now Available!

402