Previous Page  421 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 421 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1992

Annual Report

of the Discipl inary Commi t tee

T h e Disciplinary C omm i t t ee met

on 29 occasions between 1

September, 1991 a nd 31 August,

1992.

T h e following a p p l i c a t i o ns were

considered by the C omm i t t ee d u r i ng

this period:-

Subject Matter of Complaints

• Civil C l a ims

• Conveyancing

• P r o b a te

• Solicitors' Ac c o u n ts Regulations

New Applications

52

Law Society

P r i ma facie cases f o u nd

32

P r i ma facie case n ot f o u nd

1

P o s t p o n ed u n d er Section 7 (4)

b e f o re inquiry directed.

2

Private

P r i ma facie case f o u nd

5

P r i ma facie case n ot f o u nd

12

At Hearing

37

Law Society

Mi s c o n d u ct

14

A d j o u r n ed

16

A d j o u r n ed generally

1

Dismissed w i t h o ut p r e j u d i ce

1

Private

A d j o u r n ed

4

N o m i s c o n d u ct

1

Applications From Previous Year

15

Law Society

Mi s c o n d u ct

10

N o m i s c o n d u ct

1

F u r t h er i nqu i ry held wh en case

was remitted by t he P r e s i d e nt of

t he H i gh C o u r t

1

A d j o u r n ed

2

Private

Mi s c o n d u ct

1

Main Grounds on which the

Committee found Misconduct

• Allowing a deficit to arise on

client a c c o u n t.

• Mi s a p p r o p r i a t i on of clients'

mo n i es a n d utilising t h em for

solicitor's own b e n e f i t.

• False a nd inaccurate entries m a d e

in the b o o ks of a c c o u nt in order

to conceal the deficit arising f r om

the m i s a p p r o p r i a t i on of clients'

f u n d s.

• Deliberately misleading a nd

ma k i ng false representations to

the Society's investigating

a c c o u n t a nt in order to conceal

the m i s a p p r o p r i a t i on of f u n d s.

• Allowing a debit b a l a n ce to arise

on client a c c o u n t.

• Failing to ma i n t a in p r o p er b o o ks

of a c c o u n t.

• Failing to c omp ly with the

provisions of Regulation 3 of the

Solicitors Ac c o u n ts Regulations

(No. 2) 1984 (S.I. 304 of 1984.)

• P r o p er b o o ks of a c c o u nt were not

written u p at all times as required

u n d er the provisions of p a r a g r a ph

10 of the Solicitors Ac c o u n ts

Regulations (No. 2) 1984.

• Failing to f u r n i sh an a c c o u n t a n t 's

report as required u n d er the

Solicitors Ac c o u n ts Regulations.

• Wi t h d r aw i ng f r om client a c c o u nt

mo n i es o t h er t h an mo n i es

p e rmi t t ed by Regulation 7 of the

Solicitors Ac c o u n ts Regulations

(No. 2) 1984;

• Failing to c omp ly with Regulation

10 (3) of the Solicitors Ac c o u n ts

Regulations in c o n n e c t i on with

p r e p a r i ng the b a l a n c i ng a nd

reconciliation s t a t eme n ts relating

to a client a c c o u n t.

397