Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

VUCA, which stands for

Volatility, Uncertainty,

Complexity and Ambiguity

is a mnemonic coined by

the US Army War College in

the early 90’s, is becoming

ever more commonplace and

popular. In leadership and

management circles it is used

to describe environments

or contexts which have

qualities that make traditional

ideas and approaches to

leadership unsuitable. Having

language to classify these

complexities ought to enrich

our understanding of which

frameworks and approaches

are most effective for

leadership in VUCA contexts.

B

ut within a VUCA context there

are a number of leadership

tensions.

Firstly many of our leaders in

organisations have been taught

business tools, models of thinking

and leadership approaches based on

decades of research into…non VUCA

problems. While these methods

still have a great deal of utility, by

many accounts the prevalence

of VUCA environments are more

commonplace than in the 60’s,

70’s, 80’s and 90’s when much of

foundations of the modern leadership

was written. Therefore many

groomed in these approaches and

ideas are trying to apply solutions

developed for different problems.

So when ‘learned’ approach or

behaviour (unsurprisingly) doesn’t get

the desired or expected outcome, the

leader can unjustly direct that anger

inwards; despite ‘doing the right

thing’ they are left with frustration and

anxiety.

Secondly leading in a VUCA

environment challenges many of our

learned assumptions about the way

organisations and people within them

operate. In organisations leaders are

typically expected to provide a level

of clarity and certainty about what will

happen. So they create strategies

and outcomes to be achieved. In a

VUCA environment, leaders can find

themselves in the situation where

followers complain as the leaders

are being too prescriptive on how

that strategy is to be achieved and

are inhibiting the discretion wanted

to ‘work things out’. The leader may

then change ‘tack’ and allow the

freedom requested...only to be met

with more complaints that objectives

and targets aren’t clear! Which is

the correct approach? The paradox

that creates the next tension is in

many ways both are. In VUCA

environments people can need clarity

and freedom because their might

never be a ‘right’ answer, only the

least wrong.

Transforming

knowledge

into action

Leadership Resilience

in a VUCA world?

This time it really

is all about you.

By Drs Ido van der Heijden and Paul Hughes