Institute of Measurement and Control. Functional Safety 2016
Page 1
Leveraging Systematic Capability
through the SIS Lifecycle
Ian Curtis
Siemens Process Industries and Drives
Sir William Siemens House
Princess Road
Manchester
M20 2UR
Abstract
This paper considers the importance of systematic safety integrity and the term systematic capability
and looks at some of the steps taken by vendors to ensure systematic failures are addressed
effectively during the product lifecycle for a PES logic solver. It examines how some of the various
techniques and measures employed to meet the requirements of IEC 61508 can also subsequently
benefit systematic safety integrity when implementing and deploying a SIS. It discusses systematic
capability as it relates to IEC61511 Ed 2.0 and it also looks at some upcoming trends in the market
and how these might help combat systematic failures.
Background
Investigations into historic major process incidents often identify multiple systematic failures as being
one of the main contributing factors. The cornerstone of functional safety is the Safety Instrumented
Function (SIF) and it carries the target for safety integrity - normally expressed in terms of a safety
integrity level (SIL). Achieving a specific SIL requires that both hardware safety integrity and
systematic safety integrity are addressed. The IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 standards accord
importance to both aspects but there are significant differences in the approach taken for each.
Hardware safety integrity is the more tangible because it can be quantitatively assessed whereas
systematic safety integrity requires a more qualitative approach. As engineers we are arguably more
comfortable tackling hardware safety integrity - because it can be more readily measured and
controlled - but it is just as important that systematic safety integrity is also addressed throughout the
lifecycle.
Systematic failures
Systematic failures are, according to IEC 61508, “related in a deterministic way to a certain cause,
which can only be eliminated by a modification of the design or of the manufacturing process,
operational procedures, documentation or other relevant factors.”
1
Some examples of precursors to systematic failures might include human error in:-
The safety requirement specification.
The design, manufacture, installation, operation of the hardware.
The design, implementation, etc. of the software.
1
IEC 61508-4 IEC:2010 Para 3.6.6