Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1042 / 1145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1042 / 1145 Next Page
Page Background

Institute of Measurement and Control. Functional Safety 2016

Page 2

Figure 1 Failure types

Systematic Capability

IEC 61508:2010 Edition 2 introduced the term “systematic capability” back in 2010 to be used to

quantify the capability of a SIF Element (such as a sensor, logic solver or actuator) in terms of its

systematic safety integrity.

Systematic Capability is defined as "...a measure (expressed on a scale of SC 1 to SC 4) of the

confidence that the systematic safety integrity of an element meets the requirements of the specified

SIL, in respect of the specified element safety function..."

2

The term “SIL Capability” has long been used as a way of referring to the systematic safety integrity of

specific devices within a safety instrumented function. SIL capability, however, is not a term

specifically defined by IEC 61508 & IEC 61511 and its specific meaning is often misunderstood or

misused. The introduction of the term “systematic capability” gives a better, more specific way of

expressing how well a SIF element will perform in terms of systematic failures.

Developing a Product to Achieve a Specific Systematic Capability

Meeting the general requirements of IEC 61508

To claim a level of systematic capability the broader requirements of the IEC 61508 standard must be

addressed. Such as:-

·

Lifecycle approach and functional safety management

·

Competence and Competency Management

·

Processes, Procedures, Planning

·

Roles, Responsibilities

·

Verification , Validation, Testing

·

Auditing, Assessment,

·

Planning, Documentation,

·

The ‘V’ model.

·

Safety Requirement Specifications

·

Application software Safety requirement specifications etc , etc

2

IEC 61508-4 IEC:2010 Para 3.5.9