Previous Page  209 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 209 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1979

A day in the life of Two Consultants,

Six Tutors and Ninety-Seven

New Apprentices

Joseph B. Mannix

Date:

Thursday, 15 November.

Subject:

Probate and Administration (Day 2).

Objective:

To be able to take instructions after death of

Testator, to complete Inland Revenue Affidavit and all

other papers and matters to lead to a grant of probate.

Consultants:

Eamonn Mongey, Probate Officer; Peter

Quinlan, Solicitor.

Tutors:

Joan O'Mahony, Paul Foley, Emer Gilvarry,

David McMahon, Fintan Clancy, Geraldine Pearse.

A Quartz or Seiko is almost certainly required by

anyone involved in the second Professional Course under

the New Regulations. The morning breaks at 9.30 a.m.

sharp and there is no room for argument, accident or

absence by a mere minute. Christies of London, when

they hold auctions, announce boldly to the world:

"Auction begins at 11.00 a.m.

precisely".

The Pro-

fessional Course begins at 9.30 a.m.

precisely

and that's

that.

At the top table from left to right: Eamon Mongey and Peter Quinlan,

consultants for the Probate Course.

It is not adulation to time-keepers that this is so.

Punctual attendance is deemed important because the

most and the best of a Consultant's tuition can only be

acquired by being present. There is the further important

aim of avoiding disruption of the training sessions and

ensuring courtesy to the teaching teams. It was therefore

found necessary to have a certain and definite starting-

time and anybody who failed to make it by then suffered

the consequences i.e. being locked out until the first

break in the morning and being marked absent. This

seems harsh in not taking into account ordinary features

of life such as early morning traffic jams, the possibility of

a puncture on bike or car, illness etc. and is not greeted

with enthusiasm or endearment by apprentices in general.

One apprentice - Northern Irish, in origin - praised the

tight schedule for introducing and disciplining people to

office hours.

Peter Quinlan supervising a group of Apprentices at work.

The day's programme began with an introduc-

tion by Eamonn Mongey and a demonstration, pre-

recorded on closed circuit television, of the taking

of instructions to extract a grant of probate. Then,

the first exercise of the day (there were three in all)

took place. These exercises, by way of explanation,

are the best representation of the learning-by-doing

philosophy behind the Professional Course. For the

first one, apprentices paired off in twos, the one acting as

solicitor, the other as client in an attempt to take, or give,

instructions towards extracting a grant of probate. Each

tutor — the student: tutor ratio strived at is 12:1 — after

checking his or her particular group reported satisfactory

results. Indeed, it is obvious without really pursuing it that

all apprentices deeply appreciate this feature of the

course. A "couple of star performers" were put in front of

the camera and their effort was later relayed, with much

amusement, on the closed circuit television. The level of

imagination displayed and the trick questions and

answers given brought delight to all.

At 11 o'clock there was a twenty minute cofTee break

after which the first exercise was reviewed. Then, the func-

tion and filling out of the Inland Revenue Affidavit was

explained and demonstrated. This was later to be put to

its practical application in the second exercise but now, at

fifteen minutes past mid-day, an adjournment for lunch

was called. Time, ladies and gentlemen, time.

After lunch, the second exercise was undertaken in the

tutorial rooms. A surgical review was later carried out,

back in the lecture hall. Again, reports from tutors were

good. The over-all impression, shared by Consultants and

Tutors alike, was, in respect to the intelligence and

interest of the apprentices, that questions were lively and

incisive and on a couple of occasions, went outside the

scope of the subject.

212