![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0082.jpg)
GAZETTE
In conclusion, it must be said that at a time when the
Solicitors' monopoly in conveyancing matters is under
critical examination it would seem shortsighted for the
profession to allow another area of legal expertise to pass
JULY-AUGUST
1979
from its ken, and perhaps into the hands of persons, not
all of whom would have had any adequate training for
undertaking such important work.
Dublin Solicitors' Bar Association
COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE IN
IRELAND
On 14th March, 1979, Mr. Kenneth Pritchard, Secre-
tary of the Law Society of Scotland, spoke to members of
the Association on the origins and working of the scheme
of compulsory
professional indemnity
insurance
introduced in Scotland in 1976.
Introducing Mr. Pritchard, Mr. John Buckley,
President of the Association, reminded the audience that
they were listening to Mr. Pritchard in the context of the
prevailing Irish situation in which only 50% of the
Solicitors profession was covered by any form of pro-
fessional indemnity insurance and in the likelihood of
future legislation which might in due course require
all
Solicitors to be insured against professional negligence.
The Incorporated Law Society has done a great deal to
protect the public through its own compensation fund but
it remains desirable that the entire profession should be
covered by proper insurance.
Mr. Pritchard, in describing the Scottish Scheme, was
careful to emphasise that while the Scheme seemed
eminently suitable in Scotland, it might not necessarily
suit Irish circumstances, or even conditions in various
other parts of the U.K.
During the early 1970's, experience in Scotland
showed that, while many firms were covered by pro-
fessional indemnity insurance, and had been covered for
many years, many firms either were insufficiently covered
or were finding it impossible to obtain insurance cover at
any price. This, it was felt, was not based on the loss
record of Scottish Lawyers, but on the national
experience over the whole U.K., and Scottish Lawyers
felt they were being penalised unfairly for the short-
comings of Lawyers elsewhere.
In this context, the Scottish Law Society decided to
consider whether it might itself negotiate a scheme where-
by all Scottish Solicitors could be covered, motivated in
part by the belief that, if compulsory professional
indemnity insurance was to be introduced, then it would
be preferable that such insurance should be introduced by
lawyers themselves, in the most suitable form and on the
best possible terms, rather than have some scheme
imposed upon the profession which might not, in fact, be
the best that could be arranged.
As it would be necessary to have special legislation
passed to enable the Law Society to introduce its own
compulsory scheme, it was decided initially to negotiate
terms with a leading insurance company whereby
all
Scottish Solicitors who sought it could be guaranteed
cover, but at premiums negotiated individually with each
firm or sole practitioner. This "voluntary" scheme was
introduced in 1974, at premiums which seemed accept-
able, but in 1976 the insurers notified the profession that
all premiums would be increased by 400%!
After much argument, a reduced increase of only
350% was negotiated with the Company concerned.
During the negotiations on this premium increase, it
was established that during the period of the "voluntary"
scheme, the insurers had collected £300,000 in premiums
and had paid out only £21,000 in claims. Not
withstanding these figures, the Company insisted that it
must establish a very considerable insurance fund to
underwrite the scheme and this was its justification for the
large increase in premiums.
At this stage (1976) the Scottish Law Society's parallel
endeavours are successful in procuring the passing of the
Solicitor's (Scotland) Act, 1976, which included radical
provisions enabling the Council of the Law Society to
introduce compulsory insurance and to make all or any
enabling Rules, as and when necessary.
Almost simultaneously Mr. Harold Wilson, the then
Prime Minister, established a Royal Commission to
investigate the Solicitors' profession in Scotland. The
Royal Commission has not yet reported, but it may well
attack Solicitors' monopolies and may also recommend
compulsory insurance.
The Scottish Law Society decided to move while it had
a free hand and, in accordance with the provisions of the
Act, it sought advice from three independent firms of
Insurance Brokers and from the profession itself.
The alternative concepts permitted by the Act were:-
(i) A Mutual Fund;
(ii) Individual "approved" insurances, negotiated
individually, but within requirements to be laid
down by the Law Society;
(iii) A Master Policy for the profession as a whole, to
which all would contribute.
It was ultimately decided, and with a remarkable
similarity of advice from all three Brokers, that the third
84