ACQ Vol 13 no 2 2011

7 / 52

ACQ Volume 13, Number 2 2011 61
Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2004). A prosodically controlled word
and nonword repetition task for 2- to 4-year-olds: Evidence
from typically developing children. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 222–234.
Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2007). The Preschool Repetition Test:
An evaluation of performance in typically developing and
clinically referred children. Journal of Speech, Language,
and Hearing Research , 50, 442–443.
Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2008). Early phonological and
sociocognitive skills as predictors of later language
and social communication outcomes. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 49 , 635–645.
Contour, A. E., & McCauley, R. J. (2000). Phonological
working memory in children with phonological impairment.
Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics , 14(7), 449–517.
Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword
repetition and child language impairment. Journal of
Speech and Language Research, 41, 1136–1146.
Eisenberg, S. L., & Hitchcock, E. R. (2010). Using
standardized tests to inventory consonant and vowel
production: A comparison of 11 tests of articulation and
phonology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in
Schools, 41, 488–503.
Elbro, C., Borstrøm, I., & Petersen, D. K. (1998).
Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of
distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items.
Reading Research Quarterly, 33 , 36–60.
Fensen, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates,
E., Hartung, J.,... Reilly, J. S. (1993). Guide and technical
manual for the MacArthur Communicative Developmental
Inventories. San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and
word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513–543.
Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. L., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2007).
Differences in the nonword repetition performance of
children with and without specific language impairment: A
meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing
Research, 50, 177–195.
Hodson, B. W. (2004). Hodson Assessment of
Phonological Patterns (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
James, D. (2006). Hippopotamus is so hard to say:
Children’s acquisition of polysyllabic words. Unpublished
PhD thesis, The University of Sydney, Sydney.
James, D. G. H., van Doorn, J., & McLeod, S. (2008).
The contribution of polysyllabic words in clinical decision
making about children’s speech. Clinical Linguistics and
Phonetics , 22(4), 345 - 353.
Kehoe, M. M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997). Truncation
patterns in English speaking children’s word productions.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 40,
526–541.
Klee, T., & Harrison, C. (2001). CDI Words and
Sentences validity and preliminary norms for British English.
Paper presented at the Child Language Seminar, University
of Hertfordshire, England.
McIntosh, B., & Dodd, B., (2008). Two-year-olds’
phonological acquisition: Normative data. International
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology , 10, 460–469.
McIntosh, B., & Dodd, B. (2011). Toddler Phonology
Test . London: Psychological Corporation.
Mann, V. A., & Foy, J. G. (2007). Speech development
patterns and phonological awareness in preschool children.
Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 51–74.
for children 8 years and older. Comprehensive sampling of
toddlers’ productions of polysyllabic real-and nonwords
using commercial tools would thus require SPs to consider
alternatives to their mainstream picture-naming tests. One
option could be the Toddler Phonology Test (TPT)
developed by McIntosh and Dodd (2011). While the TPT
was designed to assess toddlers’ speech production skills
using real words, it only samples two 3-syllable words and
one 4-syllable word (McIntosh & Dodd, 2008). Another
more comprehensive option is the Early Repetition Battery
(ERB), developed by Seeff-Gabriel et al. (2008). The ERB is
a UK standardised assessment tool designed to assess the
expressive language of young children aged 2;0–6;0 years
via repetition tasks. The ERB contains the PSRep
(described earlier) in addition to a sentence imitation task
(SIT) comprising 27 sentences controlled for syntactic
complexity and length (ranging from three to nine words).
See Chiat and Roy (2008) and Seeff-Gabriel, Chiat, and
Roy (2010) for further information. Normative data for
Australian-English-speaking toddlers are currently not
available.
Conclusion
Typically developing 2-year-olds are capable of producing
polysyllables in both picture-naming and nonword repetition
tasks. There is an emerging body of evidence identifying the
clinical and research value of examining toddlers’
productions of polysyllables, with respect to accurate
differential diagnosis of language impairment in the early
years and the prediction of later literacy difficulties.
Research examining the relationship between toddlers’
abilities to produce polysyllables and their later speech
production skills is needed. Understandably, late talking or
unintelligible toddlers referred to SPs have immediate issues
that require attention, such as developing or expanding
their lexicon, increasing their utterance length or expanding
their singleton consonant inventory. However, given the
current state of the research on children’s productions of
polysyllabic real-and nonwords, it may be diagnostically
valuable for SPs to examine clinically referred toddlers’
abilities to produce such words. How SPs might best do
this remains to be determined. In this paper we have
reviewed a range of experimental tasks and commercial
assessment tools that are suitable for sampling toddlers’
productions of polysyllables. Further research investigating
the reliability, validity, and diagnostic value of some of these
tools is required. While this work continues, it is important
for SPs to remember that one single measure cannot be
used to identify or exclude current or later risk of speech,
language, or literacy difficulties (Seeff-Gabriel et al., 2010).
The evidence to date suggests that assessment of toddlers’
production of polysyllabic real-and nonwords would be best
done in conjunction with other suitable measures of
toddlers’ speech, receptive, and expressive language skills.
References
Baker, E. (2010). Toddler Polysyllable Test (T-POT).
Unpublished manuscript, The University of Sydney.
Baker, E., Munro, N., McGregor, K., Docking, K., &
Arciuli, J. (2010, November). A new tool for assessing
toddlers’ productions of polysyllabic words. Poster session
presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing
Association Convention, Philadelphia.
Bleile, K. (2006). The late eight. San Diego, CA: Singular
Publishing.