Previous Page  26 / 448 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 448 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1996

Jennifer Guinness,

the chairwoman of

the Labour Court, Ms.

Evelyn Owens,

and the chairman of Equity Bank Ltd.

and Trading House Investment

Company Ltd., Mr.

John

McGilligan.

Thomas Shaw - Law Society President's

nominee to Judicial Appointments

Advisory Board

The Act provides that a person who

wishes to be considered for

appointment to judicial office shall

inform the Board in writing and

provide the Board with such

information as it may require to

enable the Board to consider the

suitability of that person for judicial

office including information relating

to education and professional

qualifications, experience and

character. The Board shall recommend

to the Minister for Justice for

appointment to the relevant judicial

office such of those persons as the

Board considers suitable for

appointment. In advising the President

in relation to the appointment of a

person to a judicial office, the

Government shall firstly consider for

appointment those persons whose

names have been recommended by the

Minister for Justice pursuant to the

Act. The Board must take the

following into consideration:

• the degree of competence and

probity of the barrister or solicitor

appropriate to and consistent with

the appointment concerned;

and

• general suitability including the

issues relating to character and

temperament.

A person must undertake to take such

course of training or education or both

as may be required by the Chief

Justice or President of the Court to

which that person is appointed.

The Supreme Court

Part II of the Act deals with the

Supreme Court and provides for the

transfer on foot of a Government

order of the powers, jurisdiction and

functions of the Court of Criminal

Appeal to the Supreme Court. When

that order is made, the Court of

Criminal Appeal shall cease to exist

and all appeals pending before that

Court shall be heard by the Supreme

Court. Similar provisions are made in

relation to the Courts - Marital

Appeal Court. The Act provides

that the Supreme Court may sit

in two or more divisions at the

same time.

Number of Judges

The 1995 Act provides for the

increase in the statutory limit on the

number of ordinary judges of the

Supreme Court from four to seven, or

eight, where a Supreme Court judge is

a member of the Law Reform

Commission.

The maximum number of ordinary

judges of the High Court is to be

increased from 16 to 18, or 19,

where a High Court judge is a

member of the Law Reform

Commission. The maximum number

of ordinary judges of the Circuit

Court is to be increased from 17 to 24

and in the District Court from 45 to 50

in addition to the President of the

District Court.

High Court and Taxing Master

The Act amends and extends the

powers of the Master of the High

Court and Taxing Masters. The Act

amends and extends the powers of the

Master of the High Court by enabling

the Master to exercise limited

functions and powers of a judicial

nature. The powers of the Taxing

Master of the High Court are being

strengthened to ensure the

effectiveness of their role in relation

to the adjudication of legal costs.

Rules Committee

The Act also confers further powers

on the Superior Courts Rules

Committee and the Circuit Court

Rules Committee which will enable

these committees to make rules in

relation to pre-trial disclosure of

certain matters with the object of

shortening trials and reducing the

costs associated with personal

injuries actions.

Appointment of Solicitor Judges

Under the Act, solicitors became

eligible for the first time for

appointment as Circuit Court

judges. Section 28 provides that a

Judge with four years service in the

Circuit Court bench shall be eligible

for appointment as a judge of the

High or Supreme Court. This is a

significant provision which will

qualify a solicitor who has been

appointed a Circuit Court judge

for appointment to the High and

Supreme Court after four years

service as a judge of the

Circuit Court.

New powers have been

conferred on County

Registrars. County Registrars

are now empowered to

deal with motions such as

remitting actions to the

High Court, motions for

discovery and motions to join a

third party.

County Registrars

New powers have been conferred on

County Registrars as set out in the

second schedule to the Act. These

additional powers correspond to those

that are currently exercised by the

Master of the High Court in respect of

the High Court. The effect of the

new provisions is that County

Registrars are empowered to deal

with many motions that judges of the

Circuit Court were required to hear