![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0399.jpg)
Lodging client monies to accounts
which were not designated client
accounts in breach of Regulation 3 of
the
Solicitors Accounts Regulations.
Failing to file an accountant's report for
the practice when requested to do so by
the Compensation Fund Committee and
in accordance with the provisions of
Regulation 21 (1) of the
Solicitors
Accounts Regulations
No 2 of 1984.
Failing to take the necessary steps to
protect the client's interests by issuing
proceedings as instructed or at all.
Failing to tell clients that the solicitor
had not issued the necessary proceedings
on their behalf.
Misleading the clients about an offer to
settle a litigation matter when in fact
there was no litigation in being and no
offer had been made.
Failing to protect the client's interests by
failing to defend proceedings which had
issued against the clients.
Delaying without proper reason or cause
in the administration of the estate.
Failing to honour an undertaking.
Failing to comply with an undertaking
furnished to the complainant on
11 March 1988 in a timely manner or
at all.
Failing to clarify the position to the
Society in relation to the discharge of
this undertaking.
Negotiating a loan cheque notwith-
standing that same was furnished to the
solicitor on the strict understanding that
it was to be held in trust until such time
as all outstanding queries and stamp
duty penalties had been paid.
Misleading the investigating
accountants.
Failing to comply with the terms of the
High Court Order in a timely manner or
at all.
Failing to reply to correspondence from
the Society or clients or to deal with
clients' affairs in a timely manner or at
all.
Failing to furnish a report to the
Society as directed by the Registrar's
Committee in a timely manner or at all
or to attend meetings when requested
to do so.
By Commencement Order dated 12 May
1995, sections 16, 17, 18, 22, 23 and 25
and 58 (3) of the
Solicitors (Amendment)
Act, 1994
came into operation on 12
May 1995.
Under section 6 (1) of the
Solicitors
(Amendment) Act, 1960
as substituted by
Section 16 of the
Solicitors
(Amendment) Act, 1994,
the President of
the High Court shall from time to time,
as the occasion requires, appoint a
Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of ten
solicitor members and five lay members,
the latter being nominated by the
Minister for Justice to represent the
interests of the general public. On 22
May 1995 the aforementioned members
of the Tribunal were appointed by the
President of the High Court for a period
of five years. For the purpose of hearing
and determining any application the
Tribunal shall sit in divisions, which are
comprised of three members of whom
one shall be a lay member and two shall
be solicitor members.
An application by a person (not being a
person who has made a complaint to an
independent adjudicator under section
15 of the
Solicitors (Amendment) Act,
1994
about the conduct of a solicitor
referred to in the application) or by the
Society for an inquiry into the conduct
of a solicitor on the ground of alleged
misconduct shall, subject to the
provisions of the
Solicitors Acts 1954 to
1994,
be made to and heard by the
Disciplinary Tribunal in accordance with
its rules.
Under section 3 of the
Solicitors
(Amendment) Act, 1960
as substituted by
section 24 of the 1994 Act misconduct
includes:
(a) The commission of a treason or a
felony or a misdemeanour.
(b) The commission, outside the State,
of a crime or an offence which
would be a felony or a mis-
demeanour if committed in the State.
(c) The contravention of a provision of
the
Solicitors Acts 1954 to 1994
or
any order or regulation made
thereunder.
(d) Conduct tending to bring the
solicitors' profession into disrepute.
To commence an inquiry into the alleged
misconduct of a respondent solicitor an
applicant must submit to the clerk to the
Disciplinary Tribunal, a form of
application, grounding affidavit
specifying the allegations of misconduct
together with any documentation which
may substantiate the allegations.
The Disciplinary Tribunal after
consideration of an application, affidavit
and accompanying documentation shall
take no further action in relation to the
application, where they are of the
opinion that there is no
prima facie
case
for inquiry and shall so inform the
applicant in writing.
Where the Tribunal are of the opinion
that there is a
prima facie
case for
inquiry, they shall hold an inquiry and
the clerk shall so inform the parties.
Where on completion of an inquiry the
Tribunal find that there has been
misconduct on the part of the respondent
solicitor, they shall have power, by
order, to do one or more of the following
things, namely:
(a) To advise and admonish or censure
the respondent solicitor.
(b) To direct payment of a sum. not
exceeding £5,000, to be paid by the
respondent solicitor to the
Compensation Fund.
(c) To direct that the respondent solicitor
shall pay a sum, not exceeding
£5,000, as restitution or part
restitution to any aggrieved party,
without prejudice to any legal right
of such party.
(d) To direct that the whole or part of the
costs of the Society or of any person
appearing before them, as taxed by a
Taxing Master of the High Court, in
default of agreement, shall be paid
by the respondent solicitor.
Further, where the Tribunal find that
there has been misconduct on the part of
392