Previous Page  406 / 448 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 406 / 448 Next Page
Page Background

The Disciplinary Tribunal Annual

Report for 1995/1996

Tribunal:

SOLICITOR MEMBERS

Walter Beatty, Chairman

WB Allen

Clare Connellan

Andrew 0 Donnelly

Terence Dixon

Michael Hogan

Donal Kelliher

Eugene McCague

Moya Quinlan

Grattan d'Esterre Roberts

LAY MEMBERS

Pauline Coonan

Sean McCarthy

Mary Morris

Marie O 'Brien

Jacqui 0 'Dowd

Between 12 May 1995 and 31 October

1996 the Disciplinary Tribunal met in

divisions of three on 27 occasions. Two

general meetings also took place during

the period under review.

The following applications were

considered by the Tribunal during this

period:

NEW APPLICATIONS:

72

Law Society

Prima facie

cases found

22

Prima facie

decision adjourned

1

Awaiting

prima facie

decision

8

At Hearing

*Misconduct

15

No misconduct

1

Applications dismissed

1

Adjourned

4

Awaiting inquiry

1

*Judicial review proceedings

issued after finding of

misconduct in one case.

Private

Prima facie

cases found

10

Prima facie

cases not found

15

Awaiting

prima facie

decision

16

At Hearing

No misconduct

7

Misconduct

1

Leave to withdraw after

inquiry directed

1

Inquiry adjourned

1

Orders made by the Disciplinary

Tribunal pursuant to Section 7(9) of the

Solicitors (Amendment) Act, 1960

as

substituted by Section 17 of the

Solicitors (Amendment) Act, 1994.

14

Censured, fined and dosts

awarded

6

Censured and

fined

1

Admonished, fined and

costs awarded

1

Fined and costs awarded

2

Advised and admonished;

costs awarded

1

Admonished/censured

3

Fines ranged from £500 to £4,000.

Report of the Disciplinary Tribunal

under Section 7(3)(b)(ii) of the

Solicitors (Amendment) Act, 1960

as

substituted by Section 17 of the

Solicitors (Amendment) Act, 1994

1

Recommendation: that the name of the

respondent solicitor be struck off the

Roll of Solicitors.

SUBJECT MATTER OF

COMPLAINTS

Solicitors Accounts Regulations

Conveyancing

Probate

Civil Claims

MAIN GROUNDS ON WHICH THE

TRIBUNAL FOUND MISCONDUCT

Allowing deficits to arise on client

accounts.

Misappropriating clients' funds.

Misleading the Compensation Fund by

tendering an explanation as to how a

deficit occurred which proved to be

incorrect and misleading.

Transferring funds from the client

account to the office account to enhance

the cash flow and to avoid having to

extend the overdraft facilities.

Transferring money from the office

account to the client account prior to the

reporting date so as to mask breaches of

the

Solicitors Accounts Regulations

which had occurred by making

unauthorised transfers from the client

account to the office account.

Failing to discharge liabilities to

counsel, doctors, engineers and other

witnesses.

Operating an undisclosed bank account

and lodging settlement cheques to this

undisclosed account.

Operating an undisclosed building

society account or accounts which were

used for processing party and party costs

received in respect of settlements.

Deducting solicitor and client fees from

settlement cheques which were not

recorded in the books of account.

Failing to raise any fee notes in respect

of the solicitor and client fees deducted

from settlement monies.

Wrongfully keeping for the solicitor's

own use a set of undisclosed accounting

records in respect of the undisclosed

bank account.

Falsifying books of account in that the

books of account did not reflect a true

and accurate picture of all transactions in

relation to client monies.

Concealing accounts from both the

reporting accountant and from the

Society so that the accounts were

effectively operated outside the

protective ambit of the

Solicitors

Accounts Regulations.

Engaging in multiple and serious

breaches of the

Solicitors Accounts

Regulations

in that the solicitor failed to

keep proper books of account showing

all transactions in respect of client

monies in breach of Regulation 10.

391