Previous Page  446 / 448 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 446 / 448 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

NOVEMBER 1996

supply of medicinal products to the

public.

They also establish the

classification for supply of medicinal

products with a view to giving effect,

on an on-going basis, to Council

Directive 92/26/EEC (of 31 March

1992) concerning the classification for

supply of medicinal products for

human use.

HEALTH SERVICES

Health (Amendment) Act 1996

(Commencement) Order 1996 (SI

No. 255 of 1996)

The purpose of this Order is to bring s.

2 of the Health (Amendment) Act

1996 into operation with effect from

23 September 1996

Health

Act

1970

(Section

76)(Adelaide and Meath Hospital,

Dublin, Incorporating the National

Children's Hospital) Order 1996 (SI

No. 228 of 1996)

This Order establishes, under s. 76 of

the Health Act 1970, a body corporate

to be known as the Adelaide and

Meath

Hospital,

Dublin,

Incorporating the National Children's

Hospital and situated at Tallaght. The

Order came into operation on 1

August 1996.

MENTAL HEALTH

James Bailey v. Patrick Gallagher

(Supreme Court) 23 May 1996

Mental health - doctor signing

certificate for reception and detention

of plaintiff as involuntary patient -

necessity for leave from High Court to

issue proceedings against doctor

alleging negligence, false imprison-

ment and defamation - powers and

duties of doctor under mental health

legislation - plaintiff removed from

home and detained in Garda station

pursuant to certificate - doctor

directing release of plaintiff following

phone call from solicitor - medical

examination on which certificate

based made outside statutory limit -

whether reception and detention

order valid - whether detention by

Gardai lawful - duty on applicant to

inform person concerned of nature of

certificate and opportunity for second

examination - Constitution - access to

the courts - requirement that High

Court be satisfied substantial grounds

exist for contending defendant acted

in bad faith or without reasonable

care - degree of proof required before

leave

granted

-

meaning

of

'substantial' - whether evidence to

support finding of bad faith or want of

reasonable care on doctor's part in

signing certificate - consequences of

invalid certificate and detention in

Garda station - whether doctor acted

in bad faith - whether doctor acting

under 1945 Act - whether substantial

grounds for contending detention

unlawful and due to want of

reasonable care on doctor's part -

whether leave to issue proceedings

should be granted - Mental Treatment

Act 1945 - Mental Treatment Act

1953, s. 5 - Mental Treatment Act

1961, s. 8

NEGLIGENCE

Derek

Richards

v.

Dublin

Corporation and Motor Insurers

Bureau (Supreme Court) 12 June

1996

Road traffic accident - cyclist -

unknown driver - motor insurers

bureau - whether accident occurred

in a public place - cyclists allowed in

park - park a public place - Road

Traffic Act 1981

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Thomas Cullen v. Wicklow County

Manager and Wicklow County

Council (McCracken J) 13 June 1996

Local authority - zoning of lands -

proceedings

-

information

obligation to make available - works

carried out by owner on lands in

contravention of zoning - proc-

eedings taken against owner - file in

relation to proceedings amassed by

law agent of county council - county

council chairman's written request to

secretary - concern at status of lands

at issue - formal request for all papers

concerning lands - access to law

agent's file refused - statutory

obligation on county manager to

make available 'information' - extent

of obligation - whether request made

in accordance with statute - nature of

information covered by obligation -

County Management Act 1940 (No.

12), s. 27

Patrick McNamara v. An Bord

Pleanála and Ors (Barr J) 10 May

1996

Planning Law - planning permission -

permission granted - conditions to

permission - application for judicial

review - grounds of opposition - time

limit of two months for forwarding

grounds of opposition to affected

party -

supplemental affidavits

submitted after two month time limit -

affidavits disclosing new grounds of

opposition - permission challenged

for being contrary to evidence and

sense - planning board left certain

matters to be agreed between the

parties - whether new grounds of

opposition were submitted out of time

- whether grounds of opposition in

original documentation sufficient or

specific enough to include new

grounds - whether new grounds of

opposition could be inferred from the

grounds originally submitted

whether planning board was entitled

to leave certain matters to be decided

between the parties - whether there

was an improper delegation of

responsibility by the planning board -

whether advertisement published by

the developer complied with the

statutory requirements - whether

permission granted was contrary to

the evidence and common sense -

Local Government (Planning and

Development) Act 1963, ss. 26(1),(2),

82(3A),(3B)(a)(i) - Local Government

(Planning and Development) Act

1976, s. 14(4) - Local Government

(Planning and Development) Act

1992, s. 90(3); Local Government

(Planning

and

Development)

Regulations 1977, art 15(c) - Rules of

the Superior Courts 1986, O. 84, r.

20(2)

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Solicitors (Professional Names/ Note-

paper) Regulations 1996 (SI No. 178

of 1996)

These Regulations introduce certain

restrictions on the names under which

a solicitor or a firm of solicitors may

practice. They further prescribe the

information which may or may not

appear on the nameplate and

professional notepaper of the practice.

The Regulations, which came into

operation on 1 October 1996, do not

supersede the Registration of Business

Names Act 1963, the provisions of

which continue to be applicable to

professional names and notepaper.

Ann Foran v. Erwin Cobbe and Anor

(Supreme Court) 13 June 1996

Personal injuries - appeal from High

Court to Supreme Court - further

evidence - new trial - plaintiff's

action dismissed by High Court -

plaintiff appealing to Supreme Court -

further evidence available subsequent

to trial - whether new trial should be

directed

First National Commercial Bank pic

v. John Joseph Francis Anglin

246

3

IRISH LAW TIMES. (X IOBER I

1

!'»,