Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1074 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1074 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

REVISED 121213

Identification of presumptive

Salmonella

colonies from selective/differential agar media as

Salmonella

1

spp. has historically been achieved using a variety of biochemical and serological procedures. In the

2

case of food and environmental sample analysis, these procedures are specified in reference methods

3

such as those in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s

Bacteriological Analytical Manual

(BAM) [1]

4

and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s

Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook

(MLG) [2]. These methods

5

include conventional biochemical tests, miniaturized biochemical test devices, automated biochemical

6

identification platforms, and serological agglutination tests using

Salmonella

-specific antisera. The

7

biochemical identification procedures, although accurate and reliable, generally require 6-24 h to obtain

8

results. The serological procedures may be rapid, but often require subculture to enhance antigen

9

expression, especially in the case of flagellar (H) antigen typing.

10

As an adjunct or alternative to biochemical and serological procedures, nucleic acid-based identification

11

methods hold promise for providing timely and accurate results. This has been acknowledged, for

12

example, by reference in both BAM and MLG to use of nucleic acid-based methods for identification of

13

Listeria monocytogenes

[3, 4].

14

The ANSR®

Salmonella

assay was originally developed for rapid screening of enriched food and

15

environmental samples. The assay is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification procedure, based on the

16

nicking enzyme amplification reaction (NEAR) technology [5]. The ANSR method has been evaluated in

17

three AOAC Performance Tested Method

SM

validation studies, leading to certification as PTM method

18

061203, with claims for a wide variety of food and environmental sample types [6-7]. In these studies,

19

the ANSR method exhibited sensitivity comparable to that of the FDA/BAM and USDA/MLG reference

20

culture methods by probability of detection statistical analysis, as well as > 99% inclusivity and 100%

21

exclusivity in testing of target and non-target bacteria.

22

This method performance, coupled with the simplicity and rapidity of the assay (less than 40 min.),

23

suggested that the method could also serve as a useful tool for identification of presumptive

Salmonella

24

spp. isolates from selective/differential agar plating media. A pre-collaborative study has been

25

completed in which colonies of 113

Salmonella

spp. strains and 37 non-

Salmonella

strains were picked

26

from tryptic soy agar (TSA) and 6 selective/differential agar media [Hektoen enteric agar (HE), xylose

27

lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD), bismuth sulfite agar (BS), brilliant green sulfa agar (BGS), xylose lysine

28

tergitol agar (XLT-4), and double-modified lysine iron agar (DMLIA)] and tested in the ANSR assay. The

29

former 3 media are specified for use in the BAM reference method, while the latter 3 are specified in the

30

MLG method. One hundred twelve

Salmonella

spp. strains produced positive results from all 7 media,

31

2