Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  470 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 470 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

1

Shelf Life and Lot-to-Lot Consistency Results

2

Results for the 3M Molecular Detection Assay

Salmonella

lot to lot/consistency study are summarized

3

in Table 5 in the appendix. Both

Salmonella

strains were positive for all replicates tested showing no

4

differences between lots or kit age. The

C. freundii

strain was negative for all replicates.

5

6

Method Comparison

7

The 3M

Molecular Detection Assay

Salmonella

method was compared to the FDA/BAM

8

Chapter 5

Salmonella

(2)

reference method

for raw shrimp, bagged spinach, and wet pet food, and to

9

the USDA/FSIS MLG 4.05

Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized

10

Egg, and Catfish Products

(1) reference method for raw ground beef, cooked breaded chicken and

11

pasteurized liquid whole egg.

12

13

Each matrix was inoculated with a different strain of

Salmonella

serotypes as indicated in Table 6 of

14

the Appendix. A diluted 24 hour broth culture inoculum was added to a bulk sample of each lot of raw

15

ground beef, cooked breaded chicken, pasteurized liquid whole eggs, raw shrimp, bagged spinach, and

16

wet pet food and mixed thoroughly. The cooked breaded chicken, pasteurized liquid whole eggs and

17

raw shrimp were inoculated with an organism that had been heat stressed for 10 minutes at 50 ± 0.2

o

C

18

in a water bath. The degree of injury of the culture was estimated by plating an aliquot of diluted

19

culture onto Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate (XLD) and Tryptic Soy agar (TSA). The agars were incubated

20

at 37 ± 1°C for 24 ± 2 hours and the colonies were counted. The degree of injury was estimated

21

as

100 )

1(

x

n

n

nonselect

select

, where

n

select

= number of colonies on selective agar and

n

nonselect

= number of colonies

22

on nonselective agar. Results of the percent injury are presented in Table 6 of the Appendix. Following

23

inoculation, all test portions were mixed thoroughly, and were held at 2-5°C for 48-72 hours prior to

24

analysis to allow time for the organisms to equilibrate within the sample. Fractionally positive results,

25

those in which ether the reference or candidate method yields 5 to 15 positive results out of the 20

26

low level inoculum replicates, was required for each matrix.

27

28

The level of

Salmonella

was determined by Most Probable Number (MPN) on the day of analysis by

29

analyzing 3 x 100 g, 3 x 10 g, 3 x 1.0 g, and 3 x 0.1 g inoculated test samples. Each test portion was

30

enriched with the appropriate reference method enrichment broth at a 1:10 dilution and analyzed by

31

the reference method procedure. The number of positives from the 4 test levels was used to calculate

32

the MPN using Appendix 2: Most Probable Number of Serial Dilutions from the FDA/BAM

10

.

33

34

A background screen of each matrix was conducted prior to inoculation and no natural contamination

35

of the target organisms was detected in the test matrices.

36

37

3M

Molecular Detection Assay

Salmonella

Method Comparison

(See Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix)

38

39

USDA/FSIS-MLG 4.05 Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg

40

and Catfish.

41

For the USDA/FSIS method, all test portions for each food product, raw ground beef, cooked breaded

42

chicken, and pasteurized liquid whole eggs were prepared as described above. Following equilibration

43

of the microorganism in the matrix, 25 test portions consisting of 25 g for raw ground beef were added

44

to 225 mL of Buffered Peptone Water (BPW). For cooked breaded chicken, 25 test portions consisting

45

12