Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  529 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 529 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

Reviewer #

14.

Are there any concerns regarding the data manipulation, data tables or statistical

analyses

(if necessary, refer to the review from the Statistics Advisor)

?

1

No

2

No

3

No

4

Please refer to the review from the Statistics Advisor.

5

no

6

No comments

7

No

Reviewer #

15. Comments:

1

Good manuscript

2

None

3

For all document: is it queso fresco or soft Mexican cheese? Page 4 line 28: Oxford Agar (OXA) On

page 5 line 33 item B Apparatus and Reagents, mention B.(a); B(b.)……….. The same comment for the

other points. On page 9 line 34: inter- laboratory has to be changed to collaborative study

4

No additional comments.

5

6

Yes

7

EDITORIAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

Reviewer #

1.

Is the Validation Study Manuscript in a format acceptable to AOAC?

1

Yes

2

Yes

3

Yes

4

Yes

5

Yes

6

Yes

7

Reviewer #

2.

Is the method described in sufficient detail so that it is relatively easy to

understand, including equations and procedures for calculation of results (are all

terms explained)?

1

Yes

2

Yes

3

Yes

4

Yes

5

Yes

6

Yes

7

Reviewer #

3.

Are the figures and tables sufficiently explanatory without the need to refer to the

5

21 June 2013