Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  243 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 243 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 5: Roth Retirement Plans

243

C.

Realizing a loss on a Roth conversion.

Suppose the individual’s traditional IRA consists

entirely of after-tax money, and the value of the IRA (at the time of conversion to a Roth)

is less than his basis:

Tucker Example:

Tucker made nondeductible contributions totaling $20,000 to a traditional IRA

in the years leading up to 2010. This was and is his only IRA, and he made no contributions to it

in 2010. As of the date in 2010 when he does his conversion to a Roth the account is worth only

$17,000. What becomes of his “missing” $3,000 of basis?

A transfer from a traditional to a Roth IRA is to be taxed as if it were a distribution that

was not rolled over.

§ 408A(d)(3)(A)(i) .

If Tucker’s IRA had been totally distributed to him, rather

than being rolled to an IRA, he would have been entitled to deduct the $3,000 loss as a

miscellaneous itemized deduction. See

¶ 8.1.02 .

Accordingly, it would appear that Tucker would

report a miscellaneous itemized deduction of $3,000 on his Form 1040 for 2010 as a result of the

Roth conversion.

5.4.04

Tax treatment of converting nonIRA plan to Roth IRA

In adding plan-to-Roth-IRA rollovers, Congress applied the same rule it had used to make

IRA conversions taxable (see

¶ 5.4.03 (

A)), just throwing a few more Code sections into the

“notwithstanding” clause: “Notwithstanding sections 402(c), 403(b)(8), 408(d)(3), and 457(e)(16),

there shall be included in gross income any amount which would be includible were it not part of

a qualified rollover contribution.”

§ 408A(d)(3)(A)(i) , (B) ,

and

(C) ,

as in effect after 2007.

Emphasis added.

Notice 2008-30, 2008-12 IRB 638, Section II, questions 1–7, and Notice 2009-75, 2009-

39 IRB 436, provide guidance on plan-to-Roth-IRA conversions.

For conversions in 2010, special “income spreading” treatment is allowed; see

¶ 5.4.05 .

If

the assets converted include an annuity contract, see

¶ 5.4.03 (

A).

A.

The fictional two-step process.

The income tax treatment of a Roth conversion directly

from a nonIRA plan employs a fiction: “For this purpose, the amount included in gross

income is equal to the amount rolled over, reduced by the amount of any after-tax

contributions that are included in the amount rolled over, in the same manner as if the

distribution had been rolled over to a non-Roth IRA that was the participant’s only non-

Roth IRA and that non-Roth IRA had then been immediately converted to a Roth IRA.”

Notice 2009-75, A-1(a). Emphasis added.

Thus, the one-step process of transferring funds directly from the nonIRA plan to a Roth

IRA is treated as if it were a two-step process, with the distribution passing through a hypothetical

traditional IRA on its way to the Roth IRA. The two-step fiction means that special tax treatments

that might otherwise be available for (

e.g.

) a lump sum distribution (LSD;

¶ 2.4 )

from the nonIRA

plan are NOT available for a Roth conversion, even if the amount converted otherwise qualifies as

a “lump sum distribution.”

For example, if an employee takes an LSD of appreciated employer stock from the

employer’s QRP, the “net unrealized appreciation” (NUA) inherent in the stock receives special

income tax treatment if it is not rolled over to an IRA; see

¶ 2.5. I

f the employee rolls (converts)

the NUA stock directly to a Roth IRA, the conversion will be fully taxable as ordinary income