Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  257 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 257 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 5: Roth Retirement Plans

257

However, if the individual carried out a “legal” Roth conversion (

i.e.,

he was eligible to

and did properly convert), and seeks permission to recharacterize late due to a decline in value in

the account following the conversion, the IRS is not likely to grant the extension absent evidence

of some good reason why the individual missed the deadline, such as error by a professional

advisor. See PLR 2010-24071.

5.6.07

Same-year and immediate reconversions banned

Once a recharacterization of an amount converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA

occurs, the individual “may not reconvert that amount” to a Roth IRA until the taxable year

following the taxable year of the original conversion, or until at least 30 days have elapsed since

the recharacterization, whichever is later. Thus, recharacterization cannot be used to flip back and

forth quickly between traditional and Roth IRA status. Reg.

§ 1.408A-5 ,

A-9. If the individual

attempts to reconvert before the prescribed time period ends, the result is a failed conversion. See

¶ 5.4.06 .

Essentially, this rule bars immediate “reconversions” only for an individual who converted

all of his traditional IRAs to a Roth IRA. Someone who converted only part of his traditional IRAs

can avoid the effect of the rule by simply converting some other amount immediately before or

after he recharacterizes the first Roth conversion.

Brittany Example:

Brittany’s IRA (traditional IRA #1) in 2010 holds 30,000 shares of Acme

stock worth $10 a share ($300,000). In January 2010 she moves 10,000 shares from her traditional

IRA #1 to Roth IRA #1, thus effecting a $100,000 Roth conversion. A month later the Acme stock

has declined to $7 per share, so her Roth IRA is worth only $70,000 and her traditional IRA only

$140,000. Brittany wants to undo her Roth conversion that occurred at a higher price, but she

wants to stick with her goal of converting about $100,000 worth of Acme stock in 2010. She

recharacterizes the first conversion by moving the Acme stock out of Roth IRA #1 back to a new

traditional IRA (IRA #2). She then immediately transfers another $100,002 worth of Acme stock

(14,286 shares at $7) from traditional IRA #1 to Roth IRA #2. This new conversion is not banned

because it is not a conversion of the same “amount.”

A Roth conversion that was effected by transfer to a Roth IRA from a nonIRA plan can be

recharacterized under

§ 408A(d)(6) .

Notice 2008-30, 2008-12 IRB 638, A-5. The rule banning

same-year reconversions, by its explicit terms, applies only with respect to recharacterized

conversions from an IRA to a Roth IRA, not to conversions from a nonIRA plan. The ban

presumably also applies to plan-to-Roth-IRA conversions, under the rule that plan-to-Roth-IRA

conversions are taxed “as if” the money went through a traditional IRA first on its way to the Roth

IRA; see

¶ 5.4.04 (

A).

5.7 Designated Roth Accounts

In 2006, a new type of “Roth” plan joined the roster, the “designated Roth account”

(DRAC) inside a “cash-or-deferred arrangement” (CODA) plan.

5.7.01

Meet the DRAC: Roth 401(k)s, 403(b)s, 457(b)s

Employees have long been permitted to make “elective deferral” (also called “salary

reduction”) contributions to workplace retirement plans. Under such a

“cash-or-deferred

arrangement” (CODA)

, the participant can choose either to receive a certain amount of his