Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  62 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

62

Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits

of the account is the

earlier

of the end of the year in which the first distribution would be

required to be made to her under the life expectancy payout method

( ¶ 1.6.04 )

or the end

of the year containing the fifth anniversary of the participant’s death. This creates a

potential trap for surviving spouses of young decedents, with respect to a QRP or 403(b)

plan that allows an election but provides the 5-year rule as the default election. For

example, if the decedent dies after 2009 in the year he would have turned age 40, in Year

1, the election period expires in Year 6 (the year that contains the fifth anniversary of the

date of death), when the decedent would have reached age 45. Under the life expectancy

payout method, the surviving spouse would not have to take any RMDs until the year the

decedent would have reached age 70½ (Year 30 or 31), but if she is defaulted into the 5-

year rule in Year 6 then the entire remaining account balance becomes the RMD” for Year

6, and here is what will happen to her in Year 6:

If the inherited plan is a QRP or 403(b) plan, she will receive a distribution of the

entire balance in Year 6. Being an RMD, this distribution will not be eligible for

rollover; see

¶ 2.6.03 (

E).

If the inherited plan is an

IRA

of which the spouse is the sole beneficiary, her failure

to take the RMD in Year 6 would be deemed an election to treat the account as her

own in that year; see

¶ 3.2.03 (

D), #3. The election would be effective for the year

in which it is made, meaning that the entire account would NOT be treated as an

RMD for such year after all! See

¶ 1.6.03 (

B).

D.

Deadline for Designated Beneficiary’s election if surviving spouse is not deemed to be

the sole beneficiary

is generally the end of the year after the year of the participant’s death.

1.5.08

Computing RMDs based on participant’s life expectancy

This

¶ 1.5.08

explains

when

and

how

to compute RMDs using the “participant’s life

expectancy” as the ADP. The Required Commencement Date for RMDs computed using the

participant’s life expectancy as the ADP is the end of the year after the year of the participant’s

death. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-2 ,

A-5. Exception: if the participant died in 2008 it is 12/31/2010 (see

1.1.04 )

.

A.

When to use the participant’s life expectancy as the ADP. There are two situations in which

the participant’s single life expectancy (

i.e.,

what would have been his life expectancy if

he had not died) is the ADP for distributions to a beneficiary. Both arise only if the

participant died on or after his RBD:

If the participant dies on or after his RBD with

no Designated Beneficiary

, the ADP

is the

participant’s

remaining single life expectancy. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-

5(a)(2). This is the “no-DB” rule that applies in cases of death on or after the RBD.

¶ 1.5.04 (

E).

If the participant dies on or after his RBD leaving the benefits

to a Designated

Beneficiary

, then the ADP is the beneficiary’s life expectancy or the participant’s

life expectancy,

whichever is longer

. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-5(a)(1). So if the

Designated Beneficiary is older than the participant was, the beneficiary uses the