Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  67 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 67 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 1: The Minimum Distribution Rules

67

effect of such a provision on the ability of the original beneficiary’s executor to disclaim

the benefits.

D.

Contingent beneficiary.

Some practitioners assume that, if the original beneficiary dies

after the participant, the account passes to the

contingent beneficiary

named by the

participant. This would typically NOT be true. A

contingent beneficiary

is not the same as

a

successor beneficiary

. Usually, the participant’s beneficiary designation form provides

that the contingent beneficiary will receive the benefits only if the primary beneficiary

predeceases

the participant (or disclaims the benefits). Once the primary beneficiary

survives

the participant, the primary beneficiary (unless he disclaims the benefits; see ¶

4.4) becomes the absolute owner of the account and the contingent beneficiary’s interest is

completely eliminated. The plan documents (including the participant’s beneficiary

designation; see “E”) could provide otherwise, but typically they don’t.

E.

Participant names successor beneficiary

. Some participants would like to include

provisions dictating what happens to the benefits remaining in the account if the original

beneficiary dies after the participant but before withdrawing all the benefits. As noted at

“D,” this is something above and beyond naming a “contingent beneficiary” to take the

benefits if the primary beneficiary does not survive the participant. There is nothing illegal

about having the participant name a successor beneficiary, but it does raise property law

and estate tax issues beyond the scope of this book. Most IRA providers do not allow this

approach, unless the account is an individual retirement trust (IRT;

¶ 6.1.07

). See

¶ 3.3.11

for marital deduction effects,

¶ 4.4.12 (

A) for possible disclaimer effects.

1.5.13

What is the ADP after the beneficiary’s death?

¶ 1.5.12

explained how to determine who is the successor beneficiary. This

¶ 1.5.13

explains the Applicable Distribution Period (ADP;

¶ 1.2.03 )

that applies to the successor

beneficiary.

Subject to two rarely-applicable exceptions, the death (in the case of an individual

beneficiary) or termination of existence (in the case of a trust or estate named as beneficiary) of

the original beneficiary has

no effect

on the ADP. The successor beneficiary simply steps into the

shoes of the original beneficiary and continues to take out the benefits using the ADP that applied

to the original beneficiary. Any such subsequent beneficiary is merely a “successor” to the original

beneficiary’s interest and is ignored in determining the ADP. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-7(c)(2).

For example, if the benefits were payable to a Designated Beneficiary who survived the

participant but then died prior to having withdrawn all the benefits, the successor beneficiary

continues to withdraw over what is left of the life expectancy of the original Designated

Beneficiary (or of the deceased participant if applicable; see

¶ 1.5.04 (

B)–(D)), or at any faster rate

required by the plan or desired by the successor beneficiary. This rule holds true even if the

Designated Beneficiary, having survived the participant, dies before the Beneficiary Finalization

Date; see

¶ 1.8.03 .

Hugh Example:

Hugh, as beneficiary of his mother’s IRA, is taking RMDs in annual installments

over his 34-year life expectancy. He dies 10 years into his 34-year ADP. At Hugh’s death,

ownership of the IRA passes to Regis, a successor beneficiary named by Hugh. RMDs to Regis