Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 1: The Minimum Distribution Rules

57

such distributions must commence. See

¶ 1.5.08

for how to compute RMDs based on what

would have been the participant’s life expectancy and when such distributions must

commence.

E.

Estate, non-see-through trust, or other nonindividual beneficiary.

If the participant

died on or after his RBD, leaving his benefits to his estate

( ¶ 1.7.04 )

or other

“nonindividual” beneficiary, including a trust that does not qualify as a “see-through trust”

( ¶ 6.2.03 )

, then the participant has “no Designated Beneficiary,” and the no-DB rule

applies. Reg

. § 1.401(a)(9)-4 ,

A-3. The “no-DB rule” that applies in the case of death after

the RBD is that the ADP is what would have been the participant’s remaining life

expectancy. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-5(a)(2). Se

e ¶ 1.5.08

for how to compute RMDs based

on what would have been the participant’s life expectancy and when such distributions

must commence.

F.

Multiple beneficiaries.

If the participant died on or after his RBD, leaving his benefits to

multiple beneficiaries, see

¶ 1.7.06 (

A) regarding the RMD for the year of the participant’s

death. Then determine whether the separate accounts rule applies for ADP purposes for

years after the year of the participant’s death; see

¶ 1.8.01 (

B). If the separate accounts rule

does apply for that purpose, then, for years after the year of the participant’s death,

determine RMDs for each separate account using the rules in these subparagraphs B–F

based solely on the beneficiary(ies) of such separate account. If there are multiple

beneficiaries whose interests do

not

constitute separate accounts for purposes of

determining the ADP, then two rules apply. First, unless all the beneficiaries are individuals

or see-through trusts, the participant is deemed to have “no Designated Beneficiary” and

the “no-DB rule” applies, which is: The ADP is what would have been the participant’s

remaining single life expectancy. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-4 ,

A-3 (third sentence)

, § 1.401(a)(9)- 5 ,

A-5(a)(2). See

¶ 1.5.08

for how to compute RMDs based on what would have been the

participant’s life expectancy and when such distributions must commence. Second, if all

of the beneficiaries are individuals (or qualifying see-through trusts; see

¶ 6.2.03 )

, the ADP

is either the life expectancy of the oldest Designated Beneficiary (see

¶ 1.5.05

for how to

compute) or (if greater) what would have been the remaining life expectancy of the

participant

( ¶ 1.5.08 )

. Reg

. § 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-5(a)(1), A-7(a)(1).

1.5.05

RMDs based on life expectancy of Designated Beneficiary

Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-5(c)(1), tells us how to compute RMDs when the ADP is the life

expectancy of an individual Designated Beneficiary. This is the so-called “

life expectancy payout

method

” (also called the “life expectancy of the beneficiary,” “stretch payout,” or “

stretch IRA

method). This method applies when the participant died either

before

or

after

the RBD, and:

Benefits are left to an individual nonspouse Designated Beneficiary and the ADP

is the beneficiary’s life expectancy. See

¶ 1.5.03 (

C)

, ¶ 1.5.04 (

C).

Benefits are left to multiple Designated Beneficiaries whose interests are not treated

as separate accounts for ADP purposes

( ¶ 1.8.01 (

B)) and the ADP is the life

expectancy of the oldest beneficiary.

¶ 1.7.05 (

B),

¶ 1.6.03 (

C).

Benefits are left to a “see-through trust” of which the surviving spouse is not sole

beneficiary, and the ADP is the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary.

1.5.03 (

D),

¶ 1.5.04 (

D).