Background Image
Previous Page  2 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

NEW DRUGS AND DEVICES LISTING

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

New drugs

Indication

Dabigatran etexilate

Pradaxa

, Boehringer Ingelheim

Treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and for the prevention of recurrent DVT and

PE in adults.

Lenalidomide

Revlimid

, Celgene

For the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell

transplantation.

Ceftobiprole medocaril sodium

Zevtera

, JACE Pharma

For the treatment of the following infections in adults suspected or proven to be caused by designated susceptible

microorganisms:

• hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)

• community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Ceftolozane/tazobactam

Zerbaxa

, Merck Sharp & Dohme Australia

For the treatment of the following infections in adults suspected or proven to be caused by designated susceptible

microorganisms:

• complicated intra-abdominal infections in combination with metronidazole

• complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis.

Nintedanib esilate

Ofev/Vargatef

, Boehringer Ingelheim

Indicated in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of patients with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent

non-small cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma tumour histology after failure of first line chemotherapy. It is also

indicated for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Budesonide

Cortiment

, Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Indicated in adults for induction of remission in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis where 5-ASA

treatment is not sufficient or not tolerated.

Please consult the full Product Information before prescribing.

EMRN031601

R

heumatology

N

ews

, Australian Edition

is published by Elsevier Australia

ABN 70 001 002 357

475 Victoria Avenue

Chatswood NSW 2067, Australia

Locked Bag 7500

Chatswood DC NSW 2067

© 2016 Elsevier Inc.

Managing Editor

Anne Neilson

anne.neilson@elsevier.com

Editor

Carolyn Ng

carolyn.ng@elsevier.com

Designer

Jana Sokolovskaja

j.sokolovskaja@elsevier.com

Commercial Manager

Fleur Gill

fleur.gill@elsevier.com

Account Manager

Stephen Yue

s.yue@elsevier.com

International Editorial

F

rontline

M

edical

N

ews

Editor in Chief

Mary Jo M. Dales

Executive Editors

Denise Fulton, Kathy Scarbeck

Managing Editor

Jeff Evans

Senior Editors

Therese Borden, Catherine Hackett, Gina L. Henderson,

Sally Koch Kubetin, Mark S. Lesney, Renée Matthews,

Lora T. McGlade, Catherine Cooper Nellist, Terry Rudd,

Laura Nikolaides, Mary Ellen Schneider, Heidi Splete

Associate Editors

Felicia Rosenblatt Black, Mike Bock, Lucas Franki,

Richard Franki, Gwendolyn B. Hall, Jane Locastro,

Madhu Rajaraman

Reporters

Patrice Wendling, Bruce Jancin, Michele G. Sullivan,

Alicia Gallegos, Mitchel L. Zoler, Doug Brunk,

M. Alexander Otto, Deepak Chitnis, Whitney McKnight,

Elizabeth Mechcatie, Gregory Twachtman

R

heumatology

N

ews

is an independent newspaper that pro-

vides the practicing specialist with timely and relevant news

and commentary about clinical developments in the field and

about the impact of health care policy on the specialty and

the physician’s practice.

The news and information in

R

heumatology

N

ews

(Australian

Edition) is sourced from

R

heumatology

N

ews

(US Edition)

published by Frontline Medical News.

The ideas and opinions expressed in

R

heumatology

N

ews

,

Australian Edition do not necessarily reflect those of the

Publisher. Elsevier Australia will not assume responsibility

for damages, loss, or claims of any kind arising from or related

to the information contained in this publication, including any

claims related to the products, drugs, or services mentioned

herein. Please consult the full current Product Information

before prescribing any medication mentioned in this publica-

tion. For a digital edition visit

elseviermedcomms.com.au

To share your feedback with us, please email

news.au@elsevier.com

ISSN: 2202-221X

High-dose vitamin D increases fall risk in study of 200 patients

BY SHARON WORCESTER

Frontline Medical News

From JAMA Internal Medicine

O

lder adults treated with high-dose vi-

tamin D as part of a double-blind, ran-

domised clinical trial achieved target

25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at 6 and 12

months, but did not achieve the primary end-

point of improved lower extremity function.

In fact, the highest dose used in the study –

60,000 IU of vitamin D

3

monthly – was associ-

ated with an increased risk of falls, according

to Dr Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari of University

Hospital Zurich, and her colleagues.

In the 200 home-dwelling adults aged older

than 70 years who participated in the 1-year

study, monthly doses of 60,000 IU of vitamin

D

3

and 24,000 IU of vitamin D

3

plus 300 mcg

of calcifediol were significantly more likely

than a 24,000 IU dose of vitamin D

3

alone to

result in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of at least

30 ng/mL at 6 and 12 months, but lower

extremity function did not differ among

the groups, the investigators reported in

a study published online Jan. 4 in

JAMA

Internal Medicine.

For example, the adjusted changes

in Short Physical Performance Battery

scores – a measure of walking speed, suc-

cessive chair stands, and balance – were

0.17, 0.16, and 0.16 at 6 months in the

24,000 IU, 60,000 IU, and 24,000 IU plus

calcifediol groups, respectively, and 0.38,

0.10, and 0.11 at 12 months.

However, the incidence of falls was

66.9%, 66.1%, and 47.9% in the groups, re-

spectively, and the mean number of falls was

higher in the 60,000 IU group (1.47) and

24,000 IU plus calcifediol group (1.24) than

in the 24,000 IU group (0.94), they said, not-

ing that a similar pattern was observed during

study months 0–6 and months 7–12.

Study subjects had a mean age of 78 years,

58% were vitamin D deficient with levels of

less than 20 ng/mL at baseline, and 13% were

severely deficient (levels less than 10 ng/mL).

All had experienced a low-trauma fall in the

previous 12 months and were thus considered

a high-risk group for vitamin D deficiency and

functional decline. Vitamin D supplementa-

tion was given via one 5-mL drink solution

each month that provided 24,000 IU of vi-

tamin D

3

– equivalent to the current recom-

mendation of 800 IU/day – plus three placebo

capsules; a 5-mL drink solution that provided

60,000 IU of vitamin D

3

– the equivalent of

2000 IU/day – plus three placebo capsules; or

a 5-mL placebo drink, two capsules containing

12,000 IU of vitamin D

3

each, and one capsule

containing 300 mcg of calcifediol, which is a

potent liver metabolite of vitamin D.

Although vitamin D supplementation

has been proposed as a possible strategy

for delaying functional decline because of

its effects on muscle strength, the current

findings, which are consistent with some

prior studies, suggest that high-doses of

vitamin D confer no benefit with respect

to function decline, compared with a

standard-of-care dose of 24,000 IU of

D

3

, and that high doses may increase falls

in those with a prior fall event. Further

research is needed to confirm the findings

for daily dosing regimens, as well as to

explore the physiology behind a possible

detrimental effect of a high monthly bolus

dose of vitamin D on muscle function and

falls, they concluded.

This study was funded by the Swiss National

Science Foundation and the VELUX Founda-

tions, as well as by investigator-initiated funds

from Merck Sharp & Dohme AG, WILD, and

DSM Nutritional Products. Dr Bischoff-Ferrari

reported receiving speaker fees from and serving

on advisory boards for Merck Sharp & Dohme

AG, Amgen, WILD, DSMNutritional Products,

Roche Diagnostics, Nestle, Pfizer, and Sanofi.

Methotrexate has a role in treating articular

manifestations of psoriatic arthritis

BY NICOLA GARRETT

Frontline Medical News

From Journal of Rheumatology

P

atients with psoriatic arthritis taking metho-

trexate demonstrated an improvement

in peripheral joint disease, skin disease,

enthesitis, dactylitis, and nail disease over 12

weeks in a subanalysis of methotrexate users

in the TICOPA (Tight Control of Psoriatic

Arthritis) study.

Out of the original 206 patients in the open-

label, randomised, controlled TICOPA study,

the subanalysis involved 188 who received

methotrexate in its first 12 weeks. Substudy

authors Dr Laura C. Coates and Dr Philip S.

Helliwell of the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic

and Musculoskeletal Medicine at the Univer-

sity of Leeds (England) verified a maximum

dose at 12 weeks of at least 15 mg/week in 175,

20 mg/week in 122, and 25 mg/week in 86.

The proportions of patients achieving

American College of Rheumatology (ACR)

outcomes at 12 weeks were 40.8% for ACR20,

18.8% for ACR50, and 8.6% for ACR70. A to-

tal of 22.4% achieved minimal disease activity,

defined as meeting five of these seven criteria:

0–1 tender joints, 0–1 swollen joints, Psoriasis

Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 1 or less or

body surface area involvement of 3 or less,

patient pain visual analog score (VAS) of 15

or less, patient global disease activity VAS of

20 or less, health assessment questionnaire of

0.5 or less, and 0–1 tender entheseal points.

Other improvements that occurred at 12weeks

included 27.2% reaching a PASI75, a 62.7%drop

in dactylitis incidence, a significant drop of –59.7

in Leeds dactylitis instrument median score, and

a significant decrease in the proportion of patients

with enthesitis (25.7%). However, the median

change in enthesitis score was 0.

Response rates did not differ between pa-

tients receiving methotrexate 15 mg/week or

higher doses, although there was generally a

higher proportion who met various response

criteria among those taking greater than 15 mg/

week. However, the authors noted that there

could be an underestimation of the dose ef-

fect because the design of the TICOPA study,

which randomised patients to a protocol for

tight control of psoriatic arthritis disease activity

or standard care, introduced a bias by intention-

ally escalating treatment doses in patients who

continue to have active disease.

The investigators advised that the study

results be interpreted in the context of the

open-label design of the study, and placed

alongside the other observational studies that

support its use in psoriatic arthritis.

No relevant conflicts of interest were disclosed.

R

heumatology

N

ews

• Vol. 4 • No. 1 • 2016

NEWS

2