Background Image
Previous Page  6 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

Secukinumab cut ankylosing spondylitis symptoms in

MEASURE trials

BY NICOLA GARRETT

Frontline Medical News

From the New England

Journal of Medicine

S

ecukinumab, an interleukin

17-A inhibitor approved for the

treatment of moderate to severe

psoriasis, significantly reduced the

signs and symptoms of ankylosing

spondylitis in two phase III trials,

researchers reported Dec. 23 in the

New England Journal of Medicine

.

The results of the double-blind

MEASURE 1 and MEASURE 2

trials extend the positive results

of the phase II study, according

to Dr Dominique Baeten of the

Academic Medical Centre at the

University of Amsterdam and his

colleagues (

N Engl J Med

2015 Dec

23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505066).

“Although head-to-head trials

would be required to fully assess

the efficacy and safety of secuki-

numab versus TNF-inhibitors, the

[20% improvement in Assessment

of Spondyloarthritis International

Society (ASAS20) response crite-

ria] response rates achieved with

secukinumab at week 16 in our

studies were similar to those re-

ported in phase III studies of anti-

TNF agents in which most of the

patients had not received previous

anti-TNF therapy (response rates of

58% to 64% at weeks 12 to 24), even

though 30% to 40% of the patients in

our studies had had no response to

previous anti-TNF treatment,” the

authors wrote.

“Thus, secukinumab not only is

effective in patients who have not

received TNF agents previously but

also may be effective in patients in

whom previous anti-TNF treatment

failed,” they added.

In MEASURE 1, 371 patients

received intravenous secukinumab

(10 mg/kg of body weight) or

matched placebo at weeks 0, 2,

and 4, followed by subcutaneous

secukinumab (150 mg or 75 mg)

or matched placebo every 4 weeks

starting at week 8.

The study’s primary endpoint of

ASAS20 response rates at week 16

were 61%, 60%, and 29% for sub-

cutaneous secukinumab at doses of

150 mg and 75 mg and for placebo,

respectively, (P < 0.001 for both

comparisons with placebo).

In MEASURE 2, 219 patients re-

ceived subcutaneous secukinumab

(150 mg or 75 mg) or matched

placebo at baseline; at weeks 1, 2,

and 3; and every 4 weeks starting

at week 4.

At week 16, patients in the place-

bo group were randomly reassigned

to subcutaneous secukinumab at a

dose of 150 mg or 75 mg.

In this trial, ASAS20 rates were

61%, 41%, and 28% for subcutaneous

secukinumab at doses of 150 mg and

75 mg and for placebo, respectively

(P < 0.001 for the 150-mg dose and

P = 0.10 for the 75-mg dose).

The researchers noted that the

ineffectiveness of the 75-mg dose

in MEASURE 2 suggests that the

efficacy of secukinumab at the 75-

mg dose in MEASURE 1 may have

been due to the greater exposure at

week 16 as a result of the intravenous

loading regimen, not to the 75-mg

subcutaneous maintenance dose.

The safety profile of secukinumab

in the present studies was consistent

with previous studies of secukinum-

ab for ankylosing spondylitis and

moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis,

Dr Baeten and his associates said.

During the entire treatment period,

pooled exposure-adjusted incidence

rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia,

candida infections, and Crohn’s

disease were 0.7, 0.9, and 0.7 cases

per 100 patient-years, respectively, in

secukinumab-treated patients.

Overall, the results suggest that

interleukin-17A plays a role in the

pathogenesis of ankylosing spondy-

litis, and they validate inhibition of

this cytokine as a potential thera-

peutic approach, the study authors

concluded.

The study was sponsored by Novartis

Pharma. Dr Baeten has received a

grant fromNovartis to study the impact

of IL-17A blockade in experimental

models of spondyloarthritis. He also

has been a consultant for Novartis

for the design and conduct of the

secukinumab program in ankylosing

spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

Wearable device offers home-

based knee OA pain relief

BY PATRICE WENDLING

Frontline Medical News

From Rheumatology

A

wearable pulsed electromagnetic

fields device reduced pain inten-

sity and improved physical func-

tioning in patients with painful knee

osteoarthritis (OA) in a double-blind,

randomised trial.

The commercially available device

(ActiPatch, Bioelectronics Corp.) did

not improve patients’ mental health,

but significantly reduced patients’

intake of NSAIDs and analgesics,

compared with placebo.

“Although NSAIDs remain the

gold standard for the treatment of

pain in OA, there is increasing need

to find conservative and alternative ap-

proaches, in order to avoid the toxicity

associated with the chronic use of the

analgesics, mostly in the elderly popu-

lation,” wrote Dr Gian Luca Bagnato

of the University of Messina (Italy)

and his colleagues.

Pulsed electromagnetic fields

(PEMF) therapy has been shown to

reduce chondrocyte apoptosis and

MMP-13 expression of knee cartilage

and favourably affect cartilage ho-

meostasis in animal models, but data

regarding osteoarthritis (OA) pain and

function in humans are mixed.

A recent systematic review found

no effect in all 14 trials analysed, but

when only high-quality randomised

clinical trials were included, PEMF

provided significantly better pain relief

at 4 and 8 weeks and better function at

8 weeks than did placebo (

Rheumatol-

ogy

2013;52:815–24).

Not only has the quality of trials var-

ied, so has the PEMF pulse frequency

and duration used in trials, “further

limiting the possibility of comparing

efficacy and safety,” Dr Bagnato and

associates observed.

The current study evenly ran-

domised 60 patients with radiologic

evidence of knee OA and persistent

pain to wear the PEMF or a placebo

device for a minimum of 12 hours,

mainly at night, with the device kept

in place with a wrap. The active device

emits a form of non-ionising electro-

magnetic radiation at a frequency of

27.12 MHz, a pulse rate of 1,000 Hz,

and a burst width of 100 microsec.

Persistent pain was defined as a

minimal mean score of 40 mm for

global pain on the VAS (visual analog

scale) and daily pain during the month

prior to enrollment despite maximal

tolerated doses of conventional medi-

cal therapy, including acetaminophen

and/or an NSAID. The patients’ mean

age was 67.7 years and mean OA dura-

tion 12 years.

The primary efficacy endpoint was

reduction in pain intensity at 1 month

on the VAS and WOMAC (Western

Ontario and McMaster Universities

Arthritis Index). The mean WOMAC

total score at baseline was 132.9.

At 1 month, VAS pain scores were

reduced 25.5% with the PEMF device

and 3.6% with the placebo device.

The standardised treatment effect

size induced by PEMF therapy was

–0.73 (95% confidence interval, –1.24

to –0.19), the investigators reported.

WOMAC pain subscale and total

scores fell 23.4% and 18.4% with the

PEMF device versus a 2.3% reduc-

tion for both scores with the placebo

device. The standardised effect size

was –0.61 for WOMAC pain (95%

CI, –1.12 to –0.09) and –0.34 for

WOMAC total score (95% CI, –0.85

to 0.17).

At 1month, the mean Short Form-36

physical health score was significantly

better in the PEMF group than in the

placebo group (55.8 vs 53.1; P = 0.024),

while SF-36 mental health scores were

nearly identical (43.8 vs 43.6; P = 0.6).

Patients were allowed per protocol

to take prescribed analgesic therapy

as needed, but eight patients from the

PEMF group stopped these medica-

tions, while one patient from the pla-

cebo group stopped medication and

three started a new therapy for chronic

pain. No adverse events were reported

during the study.

“Given that our data are limited to

a low number of participants and the

long-term efficacy of the wearable de-

vice is unknown, the generalisability of

the results needs to be confirmed in a

larger clinical trial with a longer dura-

tion of treatment,” Dr Bagnato and

his coauthors concluded. “However,

the use of a wearable PEMF therapy

in knee OA can be considered as an

alternative safe and effective therapy

in knee OA, providing the possibility

for home-based management of pain,

compared with previous studies.”

US FDA

announces

new plan

to combat

opioid abuse

BY ALICIA GALLEGOS

Frontline Medical News

US

Food and Drug Administra-

tion officials are calling for a

sweeping overhaul of the agency’s

approach to opioid medications, in-

cluding renewed efforts to improve

how opioids are approved, labelled,

and prescribed.

The initiative focuses on new

policies to help reverse the opioid

abuse epidemic, while still provid-

ing patients in pain with access to

effective relief, Dr Robert M. Califf,

FDA deputy commissioner for medi-

cal products and tobacco, said in a

Feb. 4 announcement.

“Things are getting worse, not

better, with the epidemic of opioid

misuse, abuse and dependence,”

said Dr Califf, who has been nomi-

nated but not confirmed as FDA

commissioner. “It’s time we all took

a step back to look at what is work-

ing and what we need to change to

impact this crisis.”

Under the new plan, the FDA will

convene an advisory committee be-

fore approving new drug applications

for opioids that do not have abuse-

deterrent properties and develop

changes to immediate-release opioid

labeling. The agency also plans to

expand access to abuse-deterrent

formulations of opioid products and

improve the availability of naloxone

and medication-assisted treatment

options for patients with opioid use

disorders.

In a Feb. 4 editorial published

in the

New England Journal of

Medicine

, Dr Califf noted that

the number of annual deaths from

opioid overdoses now exceeds the

number of annual deaths from mo-

tor vehicle accidents (doi:10.1056/

NEJMsr1601307).

“Regardless of whether we view

these issues from the perspective

of patients, physicians, or regula-

tors, the status quo is clearly not

acceptable,” Dr Califf wrote in

the editorial. “As the public health

agency responsible for oversight of

pharmaceutical safety and effective-

ness, we recognise that this crisis

demands solutions. We are commit-

ted to action, and we urge others to

join us.”

Regardless of whether we

view these issues from the

perspective of patients,

physicians, or regulators,

the status quo is clearly not

acceptable.

Secukinumab not only is effective in patients who have not

received TNF agents previously but also may be effective in

patients in whom previous anti-TNF treatment failed.

Courtesy BioElectronics Corporation

R

heumatology

N

ews

• Vol. 4 • No. 1 • 2016

NEWS

6