Previous Page  20 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

18

SAIW Member profile: Hydra-Arc

AFRICAN FUSION

November 2015

Low str ss no distortion welding

extraction and to minimise interference with the welding arc

and weld pool.

Thermocouples were attached to the underside plate

material, positioned at 7.5, 15 and 20 mm from the weld

centreline, and bead-on-plate tests conducted. By attaching

the thermocouples to the underside of the plate they were

protected from being ripped off by the cooling head or direct

impingement of the CO

2

.

The welding trials were carried out with and without

cooling, using the cooling arrangement shown in Figure 1

and 2. Sample results from the thermocouple study can be

seen in Figure 4, which shows the effect of the cooling on the

temperature profiles.

Further, a comparison of weld macro sections shows that

thewelds fromboth conventional and LSND processes exhibit

similar cross sectional shapes, beadwidths andheights, aswell

as comparable levels of penetration. The two macro sections

can be seen in Figure 5.

Representative sampleswere thenmeasured for distortion

using a Faro arm measurement system and macro sections

taken to reviewweld quality. Typical sample distortion results

for the bead on plate specimens are illustrated in Figure 6,

which clearly show that a reduction in distortion of between

40-50% is achievable with the system in the trial. The typical

results for bead on plate samples are illustrated as a simple

visual side-by-side comparison as shown in Figure 7.

The microstructure examination of samples from both

weldmethods showed the resultingmicrostructure to be very

similar. And when the micro-hardness was also checked by

traverses across typical samplewelds, the results fromsimilar

populations where not significantly different.

Once a reliable system was established, the trials were

repeated using simplified ‘real’ joint conditions using the robot

mounted DC-LSND welding system. Trials were carried out on

butt welds in 2.0 and 2.5 mm thicknesses in XF350 steel plates,

andon a ‘tophat’ section in 2.5mmsteel, withboth 2.0mmand

2.5 mm closer plates; this condition being chosen as it is repre-

sentativeofmanyoftheweldjointsusedinautomotiveproducts.

Figure 4: Temperature plots for 2.5 mmmaterial welded at 650 mm/min using

the robotic LSND system: (a) conventional (top graph), without cooling active;

and (b) cooled (lower graph) using the DC-LSND with CO

2

snow.

Figure 5: A comparison of macro section results for conventional

GMAW weld (top); and the LSND process weld (below) for typical

bead on plate sample welds.

Figure 6: A comparison of the out of plane distortion measurements

in typical sample welds.

Figure 7: A visual comparison of distortion in typical sample bead on

plate welds.

Representative sampleswere thenmeasured for distortion

andmacro sections taken to reviewweldquality. It canbe seen

in Figure 8 that themacro section from the LSNDweld exhibits