Background Image
Previous Page  116 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

114

4 - A New Approach for Optimal Electricity Planning and Dispatching

with Hourly Time-scale Air Quality

Paul Kerl, Georgia Tech, 755 Ferst Drive, NW, Atlanta, GA,

30332, United States of America,

paul.kerl@gmail.com,

Valerie Thomas

Energy production from coal, natural gas, oil and biomass generates air pollutants

and health impacts. Pollutant exposure depends on the relative location to power

plants and atmospheric conditions which vary by hour, day and season. We have

developed a method to evaluate pollutant formation from source emissions which

we integrate with an electricity production model. In a case study of Georgia we

show how to reduce health impacts by shifting production during select hourly

periods.

SC63

63-Room 112B, CC

Doing Good with Good OR II

Cluster: Doing Good with Good OR

Invited Session

Chair: Itai Ashlagi, MIT, 100 Main st, Cambridge, Ma, 02139,

United States of America,

iashlagi@mit.edu

Co-Chair: Lisa Maillart, Swanson School of Engineering, Hall

Pittsburgh, PA,

lisa.maillart@engr.pitt.edu

1 - Finding Patterns with a Rotten Core: Data Mining for

Crime Series Detection

Tong Wang, Graduate Student, MIT, 70 Pacific Street, Apt. 242A,

Cambridge, MA, 02139, United States of America,

tongwang@mit.edu

We worked with the Cambridge Police Department to build a model that can

automatically detect crime series, which analysts spend hours per day doing it

manually. NYPD is currently working with our code, aiming to incorporate it into

a custom software package they are developing which can assist in their daily job.

This project has received widespread media attention.

2 - Infusion Center Process Improvement and Patient

Wait Time Reduction

Mengnan Shen, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States of

America,

motion0720@gatech.edu

, Xiaoyang Li, Allen Liu,

James Micali, Jisu Park, Yunjie Sun, Emilie Wurmser,

Sung Keun Baek

Winship experienced long wait times and low patient satisfaction. Combining data

analytics, stakeholder interviews, queuing network principles, and detailed

simulation analysis, we improved flow, communication, and visibility throughout

the process. Winship implemented our suggestions, resulting in a 28% reduction

in patient wait times from check-in to chair, a 8.5% increase in patient

satisfaction, and a 6 patients/day increase in throughput.

3 - Using Operations Research to Improve the Health of Patients with

Type 2 Diabetes

Yuanhui Zhang, NC State, United States of America,

yuanhui.zhang@gmail.com

We developed OR models for policy evaluation and robust optimization of clinical

regimens for glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes. We used the

models to address controversial questions including: whether protocols based on

new medications are more effective than standard regimens. A publication from

this work received substantial press and may help inform treatment

recommendations in the future.

SC64

64-Room 113A, CC

Joint Session DAS/ENRE: Decision Analysis

Applications in Oil and Gas

Sponsor: Decision Analysis & ENRE

Sponsored Session

Chair: Brad Powley, Senior Consultant, Strategic Decisions Group,

745 Emerson Street, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, United States of America,

bpowley@sdg.com

1 - Defining Prospects for Decision Analysis

Ahren Lacy, Decision Analysis Advisor, Chevron, 1400 Smith St,

#31-128, Houston, TX, 77007, United States of America,

Ahren@chevron.com

The prospect is the building block of decision analysis. We express our belief

about the likelihood of a prospect’s occurrence (by assigning a probability), and

we express our preference should we obtain it (often using a monetary value

measure). Clarity of action in a complex decision requires careful selection of

distinctions in order to define useful prospects. The author will discuss several

real-world applications in oil and gas projects where clear distinctions led to

clarity of action.

2 - A Probabilistic Analysis of Drilling Strategies in Unconventionals

Robert Hammond, Decision Analyst, Chevron, 1400 Smith St,

Houston, TX, United States of America,

rhammond@chevron.com

This talk will focus on a probabilistic decision analysis of drilling strategies in an

unconventional oil and gas play that has sporadic areas with low chances of

drilling success. The analysis helped determine the optimal drilling strategy,

including whether to drill multiple wells from a single surface location, which

reduces development costs and environmental footprint, or a spaced well

approach, which in some cases can be used to avoid drilling issues and additional

development costs.

3 - Meta-modeling in Decision Analysis: A Case Study

Brad Powley, Senior Consultant, Strategic Decisions Group, 745

Emerson Street, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, United States of America,

bpowley@sdg.com

, Eric Bickel

A sophisticated physical model, despite representing an organization’s best

thinking, may be excluded from a decision analysis because it cannot complete a

requisite number of runs in a reasonable amount of time. When facing such a

situation, we created a statistical model of a hydrocarbon reservoir model based

on a handful of previous runs, and used it to conduct a probabilistic simulation on

project economics. This talk introduces that approach, and discusses its merits and

challenges.

4 - A Cognitive Decision Room for High-stakes Decision Making

Jeffrey Kephart, IBM, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown

Heights, NY, 10598,

kephart@us.ibm.com

, Debarun Bhattacharjya

We have built a cognitive room in which decision makers use a combination of

speech and gesture to interact with a multi-agent system of decision and

information agents. We overview the hardware and software infrastructure of the

cognitive room, describe a set of interacting decision agents, and illustrate via

several examples how the room enables human decision makers to make better,

more informed decisions in the context of high-stakes decisions in domains such

as mergers and acquisitions.

SC65

65-Room 113B, CC

Systems Engineering and Decision Analysis

Sponsor: Decision Analysis

Sponsored Session

Chair: Robert Bordley, Expert Systems Engr Professional, Booz-Allen-

Hamilton, 525 Choice Court, Troy, Mi, 48085, United States of America,

Bordley_Robert@bah.com

1 - Limits to Rationality in Systems Engineering

George Hazelrigg, Deputy Division Director, National Science

Foundation, Civil, Mech. & Mfg Innovation,

4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Va, 22230,

United States of America,

ghazelri@nsf.gov

Rationality is a worthwhile goal in any engineering activity enabling optimization

and averting poor choices. But attempts to create a rational framework for

systems engineering fail at the time the second person is assigned to the project.

We outline the limits to rationality in systems engineering and illustrate

consequences. Systems design approaches can have destructive impacts on system

design. This paper presents simple procedures to avoid such problems.

2 - Improving Systems Engineering Trade-Off Studies

Greg Parnell, Professor, University of Arkansas,

Department of Industrial Engineering, Fayetteville, AR, 72701,

United States of America,

gparnell@uark.edu

Today’s complex systems involve significant uncertainties, multiple stakeholders

with conflicting objectives, and growing affordability concerns. SE trade-offs arise

throughout the system life cycle. Surprisingly many of the published trade-off

studies do not have a strong mathematical foundation, do not provide an

integrated assessment of value and risk, and many do not even consider

uncertainty. We report on a book project to provide best practices using decision

analysis.

3 - Making Product Development Decisions with Decision Analysis

Dennis Buede, President And Executive Director, Innovative

Decisions, 8230 Old Courthouse Road, Suite 460, Vienna, VA,

22182, United States of America,

dbuede@innovativedecisions.com

Formal decision processes during system design are commonly called trade studies

or analyses of alternatives (AoAs). This paper will give an overview of the process

for systems engineering and product development, describe the many kinds of

trade studies that should be undertaken, relate decision analysis to these trade

studies and discuss complexities of system design about which decision analysts

should be aware. Numerous real world examples will be given along the way.

SC63