Previous Page  256 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 256 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

M

W

H

JULY 1994

Deba te on ' Capp i ng'

Con t i nues

A press statement issued by the Law

Society on 9 June, stating that the

proposal by the Minister for Commerce

and Technology,

Seamus Brennan,

TD,

to introduce legislation to place a cap

on the amount of compensation the

courts could award in personal injury

actions, amounted to a vote of no

confidence in one of the most

fundamental aspects of the legal

system - the adjudication by

independent judges of the amount of

compensation a person should get

when they suffered personal injury

through no fault of their own - was

reported in the

Irish Independent, Cork

Examiner

and

Irish Press

of 10 June

and in the

Limerick Leader

on 15 June.

An article in the

Sunday Tribune

of 12

June reported that the proposed

legislation would include a major

overhaul of the law relating to personal

liability. The article quoted a

spokesperson for the Law Society as

saying that the Minister's proposed

schedule for compensation awards

would curtail judicial discretion in

awarding damages for personal injuries

and could be unconstitutional. It could

mean that judges would be unable to

take the personal circumstances of an

injured party into account and that

would lead to injustice.

A feature article in the

Irish

Independent

on 29 June reported that

the "Brennan Bill" would include a

new definition of the duty of care,

would reform the law concerning

occupiers' liability, would reform pre-

trial procedures, would permit

structured awards and would provide

for a schedule of payments for a range

of different injuries. The article quoted

the President of the Law Society,

Michael O'Mahony,

as saying that the

proposed schedule would almost

certainly be unworkable and he also

questioned whether the proposals

would lead to a reduction in insurance

costs.

An article in the

Sunday Tribune

of 3

232

July said that the establishment of a

personal injuries compensation board

and a detailed grading system to assess

pain and suffering awards were the

main provisions of the forthcoming

Bill. The article noted that critics of the

legislation had said that the idea was

fraught with legal and constitutional

difficulties.

The

Irish Independent

of 4 July

reported that the Government had ruled

out the option of introducing a fuel

levy as an alternative to legislation to

cap personal injury awards.

Cost of Delay

On 21 July 1994 the

Irish Times

reported comments by Mr.

Justice

Costello

in the High Court when he

said that he would like the Comptroller

and Auditor General to investigate the

cost to the tax payer of having to pay

for regular High Court motions where

the State failed to lodge a defence to an

action within the appropriate time.

Greater Transparency on

Disciplinary Procedures

An article by

Kieron Conway,

j published in the

Irish Times

on 11

June, noted that although there were

over 5,000 complaints about solicitors

made to the Law Society in the past

five years only a handful ended up in

court. The journalist commented that

there was greater transparency in the

regulatory system for the profession as

a result of a change in policy eighteen

months ago by both the Law Society

and the High Court and the article

noted that since the beginning of 1993

the Law Society had published in its

Gazette

details of amounts paid out by

the Compensation Fund and had also

reported on all final determinations of

the High Court on disciplinary matters.

Solicitors Bill

The

Sunday Business Post

on 26 June

reported that SADSI was calling on

President Robinson to test the

constitutionality of the Solicitors

(Amendment) Bill, 1994 on the

grounds that it proposed an unlawful

restriction on the constitutional right to

earn a livelihood. According to

SADSI, section 37 of the Bill would

have the effect of precluding a newly-

qualified solicitor from setting up in

practice for a period of three years

after qualification.

Claim on the Compensation Fund

An article by

Veronica Guerin

in the

Sunday Independent

of 29 May,

reported that the Irish Permanent

Building Society was engaging in an

internal investigation to establish how

the purchase of 38 properties had been

financed at a cost of £1.5m although

they were expected to make a

maximum of £900,000 at auction.

The article noted that the Building

Society had reported a number of

solicitors involved in some of the

transactions to the Law Society.

In the ensuing weeks, a number of

daily and Sunday newspapers noted

that the Irish Permanent Building

Society had lodged a claim of

£500,000 on the Compensation Fund

in relation to the mortgage transactions

and had notified the Society of its

intention to make a claim for a further

£220,000.

Numbers

The evening papers on 23 June, and

the

Irish Independent

of 25 June noted

that, according to a European survey

by the publishers of

Law Firms in

Europe Guide,

Ireland had one lawyer

for every 920 citizens, ranking sixth in

the survey. On 26 June an article in the

Sunday Tribune

noted that a survey

undertaken by the Law Society of

students on the 30th Advanced Course

had shown that 25 of 66 respondents

believed that they had no prospect

of employment following

qualification.