Previous Page  315 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 315 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

L A W B R I E F

OCTOBER 1994

In ; i i i

A

by Dr Eamonn Hall

Rights of Audience

Solicitors have rights of audience in all

courts in Ireland since 1971. Some

have exercised their rights pleading

their cases in the Circuit, High and

Supreme Courts without a barrister.

Most solicitors have chosen not to

exercise such rights at least in the High

and Supreme courts. But if they

exercise such rights of audience,

should they be dressed any differently

from other professional advocates - the

barristers?

Solicitors' Robes

The office of attorney in these islands

originated in the thirteenth century, and

in mediaeval times attorneys wore long

gowns like other members of the Inns

of Court and Chancery. In Tudor times

they adopted the open black gown.

Some attorneys, by virtue of rank

within the Inns of Chancery, wore

black laced gowns, at least within their

inns. But the gown which became

established for court wear was of plain

black stuff, with a flat collar like that

of King's Counsel. By Victorian times,

the gown had become disused,

although there was a partial revival in

the 1840s, firstly to facilitate access to

busy law courts, and secondly to

reflect the status of attorneys as

advocates, especially in the new

County Courts.

Since c. 1875, when attorneys were

abolished, solicitors have been the sole

representatives of this branch of the

profession. Solicitors wore the same

gowns as attorneys but by the end of

Victorian times they wore them only

when appearing as advocates, and still

not universally. In 1902 a stir was

caused when a County Court judge at

Brentford in England required solicitor

Court dress for solicitors

advocates there to wear robes. The

Law Society sounded professional

opinion and then, rejecting minority

representations from Liverpool

and Sussex, ruled that it was

"desirable" for solicitor advocates to

robe in court.

Wigs

Until the seventeenth century lawyers

wore natural hair, and professional

discipline required that hair and beards

be moderately short. Indeed, in 1632

the Court of Star Chamber announced

that "if a barrister came with long hair

he should not be heard." Nevertheless,

the introduction of wigs into polite

society in the reign of Charles II was

an innovation which could not be

resisted.

Wigs and Solicitors

Attorneys and solicitors stopped

wearing wigs when they went out of

fashion in the eighteenth century. (At

the lowest end of the profession some

may never have worn them.) Since

1846, when they were given rights of

audience in the newly established

County Courts of the United Kingdom,

there have been recurring public

debates as to whether wigs should be

worn by all advocates in those courts.

However, no agreement on the subject

was reached, and therefore solicitor

advocates do not wear wigs.

The Lord Chancellor,

Lord Mackay

of

Clashfern, has invited comments on

whether solicitors in England and

Wales should be allowed to wear wigs

in court. This follows a Practice

Direction which was handed down on

July 19, 1994 by the Lord Chief Justice,

Lord Taylor

of Gosforth, on behalf of

the Lord Chancellor. The Direction

stated that, despite recent extensions to

solicitors' rights of audience, there was

no change to the rule on the dress to be

worn in court. In particular, this means

that while Queen's Counsel and junior

counsel wear a short wig in court,

solicitors do not. The current dress

requirements for solicitor advocates in

England and Wales is a black stuffed

gown with bands but no wig.

The Direction was issued because of

the need for consistency in court dress

worn by solicitors. However, the Lord

Chancellor made it clear that he would

consult further before arriving at a

long-term decision. He has written to a

number of interested parties to seek

their views.

Have solicitors in Ireland any views

about court dress for solicitor advocates?

Salaries of the Judiciary and

Senior Law Officers

The Government announced on August

30, 1994 that it decided to implement

the decisions of

Report No. 35 of the

Review Body on Higher Remuneration

in the Public Sector,

chaired by Mr

Dermot Gleeson,

SC, which was

Court Dress for Solicitors

291