GAZETTE
AUGUST/SEPTEMBER
1994
in detailed risk analysis, and
: ultimately makes the decision himself, '
mediated settlements tend to endure,
and there is less scope for post-
; settlement dissatisfaction and
i
negligence claims.
When to Mediate?
j
Mediation can be effective at both
j
! pre-litigation and litigation stages. At
j
the outset of a dispute, face-to-face
!
negotiations between the parties may
í
fail because the parties are entrenched
j
in their respective positions and will
not listen to each other. The early
j
introduction of a trained mediator can
help to diffuse antagonism, and to
create an atmosphere in which
settlement is more likely to occur.
j
Mediation can also be used after
! litigation has commenced, at any time
up to the trial date, or even after a
Notice of Appeal against the trial
verdict has been served. The litigant
may need to go through the processes
I of issuing proceedings or trial before
resistance to settlement is softened.
Advantages of Mediation
|
(a) Speed: once all the parties have
agreed to try mediation, the
mediation itself may be set up
within days or weeks. Mediation
may be considered as soon as all
the information necessary to
formulate a settlement position is
i
available.
(b) Cost: mediation may help the
parties to settle their case before
legal, managerial or "opportunity" |
costs become excessive or
j
disproportionate to the amount in
dispute, and without the expenses
of witnesses attending for lengthy,
costly questioning and cross-
examination.
(c) Privacy: unlike litigation, the
process, details and outcome of
the dispute remain private, sealed
off from the attention of the
parties' customers or competitors,
and from local spectators and the
media.
(d) Flexibility and responsiveness: a
mediation can be held quickly and !
at a convenient location and time.
It may yield creative, tailor-made
settlement terms other than, or in
addition to, the payment of money
which may have been outside the
competence of a court or
arbitrator to order. Or a settlement
for the present, with negotiations
to be re-opened on the occurrence
of a Contingency, may be agreed.
(e) Preservation of valuable
relationships: often the parties
must have further dealings
together after the dispute is
resolved. Examples include family
law, partnership, family business
or succession disputes,
commercial leases, construction
projects and disputes with
business suppliers.
(f) Multiple parties or issues:
traditional negotiations may not
allow the time necessary to
accommodate all parties on all
issues in complex disputes. A
mediator will bring all parties
involved to the table, will co-
ordinate the discussions so that the
issues can be approached, clarified
or simplified in an orderly way.
(g) "Outbreaks of common sense": it
is much more difficult to sustain
an unreasonable position during a
detailed face-to-face analysis of
the case at mediation than it is in
correspondence.
(h) Improved communication
between parties, solicitors, or
solicitor and client: the mediator
helps each side to put their case
directly to their opponent and
helps to keep the discussions at a
civil and reasonable level.
The Mediator's Role
The mediator is trained to facilitate a
resolution between the parties not to
adjudicate. He or she has a fresh
perspective and an impartial view of
the dispute with which to help the
parties to analyse their respective
positions. The mediator's role may
include:-
• providing a safe, structured
environment for the venting of
frustrations, the trying out ideas in
I
private meetings or the "floating" of ;
settlement offers;
• pointing out the strengths and
weaknesses of each position as
j
devil's advocate, focusing on reality
and helping to change expectations;
• discovering and addressing
assumptions, needs, interests and
i
priorities that have not been
articulated or recognised;
• exploring novel options such as
non-monetary relief or structured
settlements.
I "Hoary Old Chestnuts"
j
How many solicitors have cases in
their filing cabinets which they would I
rather see resolved than face the time
input, the cost to their clients or their
practice, or the risk of losing or of not
being paid adequately (or at all!) of a !
court hearing? The prospect of
handling an awkward case or a "good"
client with unreasonable expectations
repeatedly during the years of
j
litigation ahead can be a petrifying
one! Mediation can provide an
opportunity to deal with such cases
and to place the responsibility for a
!
dispute firmly where it belongs - on
the shoulders of the client.
How Can I Refer a Case to
Mediation?
1
J
A solicitor, in consultation with the
client, should ask his/her opposing
j
colleague(s) if they and their client
would be prepared to try mediation for
a particular case. The solicitor for
each party should then contact a
|
reputable company or individual
providing mediation services, for
information on their mediation
'
procedures and codes of practice, to
discuss with their client. Once all
parties agree to mediation the
mediation company will make the
detailed arrangements for the
j
mediation, including the selection of a j
venue and of a trained, suitably
j
skilled, agreed person to act as
!
i mediator.
i Mediation - Already in Place in
Ireland
Mediation has already earned a
J
respected place for itself in the areas
381




