Previous Page  406 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 406 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER

1994

T h e I r i sh S o c i e t y f o r E u r o p e an L a w

Officers and Council for 1994 -

1995

President

Judge Brian Walsh

Vice-Presidents

Judge Thomas F. O'Higgins

Judge Andreas O'Keeffe

Judge Donal Barrington

Judge John Murray

Mr. Vincent Landy, Senior Counsel

Mr. Finbarr Murphy, Barrister

Dr. Eamonn G. Hall, Solicitor

Mr. Vincent Power, Solicitor

Chairman

Mr. Bryan Sheridan, Solicitor

Vice-Chairman

Mr. Arthur F. Plunkett, Barrister

Hon. Secretary

Mr. Noel Travers, Barrister

Hon. Treasurer

Ms. Anne Nagle, Solicitor

Committee Members

Ms. Nuala Butler, Barrister

Mr. Anthony Collins, Barrister

(Co-Editor of the Society's Journal)

Ms. Edwina Dunne, Solicitor

Mr. Edward Donnellan, Barrister

Mr. Gerard FitzGerald, Solicitor

Ms. Fionnuala Kilcullen, Barrister

Ms. Monika Leech, Barrister

Mr. Patrick McGovern, Solicitor

Mr. John Meade, Solicitor

Mr. Kieran Mooney, Barrister

Mr. Andrias O'Caoimh, Senior

Counsel

Mr. James O'Reilly, Senior Counsel

(Co-Editor of Society's Journal)

Ms. Ann Walsh, Solicitor.

Membership of the Society is open to

lawyers and to others interested in

European Law. The current annual

subscription is £30.00 (£15 for

students and those qualified for less

than three years). The annual

subscription includes entitlement

to a copy of the

Irish Journal of

European Law

for the year of

membership.

Applications for membership (which

should be accompanied by payment of

the annual subscription) should

include name, address and, where

relevant, year of qualification and

should be sent to the Hon. Treasurer

Ms. Anne Nagle, Solicitor, Solicitor's

Office, Telecom Eireann, Harcourt

Centre, 52 Harcourt Street, Dublin 2.

Tel: (01) 671 4444 ext. 5053. Other

correspondence should be addressed

to the Hon. Secretary, Mr. Noel

Travers, Barrister, Faculty of Law,

University College Dublin, Roebuck

Castle, Dublin 4.

of family law and industrial relations

; in Ireland. However, despite

increasing pressure on our courts

system, our legislature has not as yet

adopted ADR methods in a more

widespread way as a means to address

that pressure. While The Queens

Bench Commercial Court in England

has now done so in a Practice

Direction in 1994, as follows:

; ". . . . the judges of the court wish to

encourage parties to consider the use

of Alternative Dispute Resolution

(ADR), such as mediation and

conciliation, as a possible additional

means of resolving particular issues or

disputes. The judges will in

appropriate cases invite parties to

consider whether their case, or certain

I issues in their case, could be resolved

by means of ADR. . . . The clerk of

the Commercial Court will keep

a list of individuals and bodies that

offer mediation, conciliation and

other ADR services. . . . This p

ractice statement will be drawn

to the attention of all persons

commencing proceedings in the

Commercial List."

In this jurisdiction we are a long way

away from developments in one State

in the U.S., where failure to advise a

client in a commercial dispute of the

existence of ADR techniques

was held to amount to professional

negligence!

Conclusion

Solicitors have a number of valuable

and potentially profitable roles in the

mediation process. They can act as

advocates for their client at the initial

joint meeting. Throughout the process,

they act as advisers to their clients,

consulting throughout the risk-

analysis process and providing advice

on legal issues. They will also

normally draft the settlement

document and be involved in its

implementation.

ADR abroad is helping to improve the

profitability of processing lawyers'

case loads, in particular of risky or

"no foal no fee" cases, and is helping

to boost lawyers' incomes. It is also

; creating greater client satisfaction

with lawyers' services, and improving

client loyalty. There is no reason why

it should not have the same effect in

this jurisdiction.

Apart from our duty to our clients and

| to our overburdened judicial system of

which we are officers, solicitors also

have a duty to themselves and their

families to consider new methods and

i techniques which may enhance the

| profitability, "user-friendliness" and

indeed continued survival of their

j

practices. Mediation may well be one

such technique.

Appendix

• Sample Mediation Clause

i

In the event that a dispute shall arise

; between the parties, the parties hereby

agree to participate in

hours (four or six hours is

recommended) of mediation in

accordance with the procedures of

(name of mediation company). The

parties agree to equally share the costs

of such mediation.

| *Brian H. MacMahon B.C.L. MSc.

(Mgmt), Solicitor is principal of

Arthur E. MacMahon,

Solicitors,

Naas, Co. Kildare.

382