Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 127 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 127 Next Page
Page Background

3.1.3 Trading in Adjacent Zones

12) Bulgaria reported having set Virtual interconnection point between the two balancing zones – Transfer point by 1 January 2017.

TSOs may seek NRA approval for trading STSP

in adjacent zones as an alternative to the trading

title products or locational products in their own

balancing zone. In addition to the three coun-

tries (DE, PL and SK) that have already imple-

mented this option, Czech Republic has also

stated that the TSO request was approved by the

respective NRA. In Czech Republic this option is

ranked in the merit order as the last measure. It

is expected to be used only exceptionally, there-

fore the limitation of access by other network us-

ers is reported as negligible. (Further details are

provided in

Annex II, table 2.3 )

Germany and Poland confirmed the annual

review of applicable terms and conditions. Slo-

vakia reported it as not applicable. It is only im-

plemented in the merit order as a backup to the

existing balancing platform.

An overview table of the reported merit order

with the balancing products per balancing zone

or country is available in

Annex II, table 2.4 .

3.1.4 Operational Balancing Implementation Practices

Regarding the cross-border cooperation be-

tween TSOs when establishing any new STSP,

only Germany reported having done it in accord-

ance with to Art. 7.7 of BAL NC compared to

1 October 2015. Romania indicated that due to

the limited interconnection capacity, the TSO

does not currently have the possibility to include

the IP in the balancing zone and therefore, it is

not able to develop STSP with the neighboring

countries. Spain clarified that the necessary

cooperation was developed under the South Gas

Regional Initiative umbrella. No new STSPs have

been identified as necessary in the SGRI after

1 October 2015.

To foster the liquidity of the short term wholesale

gas market, the NRA can incentivise the TSO to

undertake balancing actions efficiently or to

maximise the undertaking of balancing actions

through trade in STSP. Four (AT, ES, IT and UK-

GB) of the five countries that, in the previous re-

port, had indicated that an incentive mechanism

was already implemented or foreseen, con-

firmed having established an incentive mecha-

nism for optimising TSO balancing actions by

1 October 2016. Further details are provided in

Annex II, table 2.5.

3.2 BALANCING SYSTEM (CHAPTER II OF BAL NC)

Gas transfer between two balancing portfolios

within one balancing zone shall be done by dis-

posing and acquiring trade notifications submit-

ted to the TSO in respect of the gas day. The in-

tention is to incentivise network users to optimise

their gas portfolios efficiently, so that the need

for TSOs to undertake actions would be mini-

mised.

Independently from their applied implementa-

tion deadline, all countries must implement

trade notifications by 1 October 2016.

In Map 3 below it can be seen that 24 countries

including Estonia (AT, BE/LU, BG

12)

, CZ, DE, DK,

ES, FR, HR, HU, IE, IT, LT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SE,

SI, SK, UK-GB and UK-NI) except Greece have

reported the establishment of a scheme that al-

lows network users to transfer gas between two

balancing portfolios within one balancing zone

as well as establishing a trade notification by

1 October 2016. Greece indicated the planned

implementation of the trade notification within

2018. However, network users are currently able

to transfer gas between two balancing portfolios

by submitting nominations at the Virtual Nomi-

nations Point (VNP) of the Greek NGTS.

ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016 |

15