Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 127 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 127 Next Page
Page Background

3.3.2 Nomination and Re-nomination Provisions for Bundled Capacities

22) AB Amber Grid is currently interconnected just with the transmission system of Latvia which has derogation based on Article 49 of

Directive No 2009/73 and BAL NC is not applied to Latvia, bundled capacity is not offered. Estonia holding derogation does not apply

the rules for bundled capacity.

23) See Section 3.3.1 hourly re-nomination cycle and standard re-nomination lead-time of hours for further information regarding

IP Remich in Luxembourg.

24) See also footnote 21

25) See section 3.3.1 hourly re-nomination cycle and standard re-nomination lead-time of two hours for further information.

26) Last available information with the following order: weekly planning, monthly planning.

(See Snam Rete Gas Network Code (chapter 8, paragraph 6.3) at

http://www.snamretegas.it/en/services/Network_Code/Aree/Codice_di_rete.html)

27) In Italy there is a different rule other than “lesser rule” and “zero rule”. The rule in place is agreed with the adjacent TSOs even if it is not the

same they implemented.

28) In Bulgaria the default nomination rule is agreed for all IPs of our system except the IP with Greece – Kulata/Sidirokastro.

Where TSOs offer bundled capacities at IPs, the

nomination and re-nomination provisions

according to Article 12(3) of BAL NC shall also

apply to single nominations and re-nominations

for bundled capacity products. 20 countries 

22)

(AT, BE/LU 

23)

, BG, CZ, DE, ES, FR, HR, HU, IE,

IT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SI, SK, UK-GB and UK-NI)

reported having applied the same rules for

unbundled and bundled capacity products.

Greece reported applying the same rules for

bundled and unbundled capacities. However

these rules are not compatible with the applica-

ble provisions of BAL NC 

24)

. Four other countries

including Estonia (DK, LT 

25)

and SE) responded

not applying the same rules for unbundled and

for bundled capacity. Denmark indicated that

the single nomination will be implemented later

this year.

Many countries applying the same rules,

reported cooperating with adjacent TSO for the

purpose of implementing nomination and re-

nomination rules for bundled capacity products

at IPs. On-going processes have been indicated

for some IPs. (See outcome of co-operations in

Annex III, table 3.4 )

3.3.3 Agreed Default Nomination Rule with Adjacent TSO if Valid

Nomination (before deadline) is Not Sent by NU

In absence of a valid nomination sent by the net-

work user before the nomination deadline, the

respective TSO shall apply the default nomina-

tion rule agreed between these TSOs.

In total 23 countries including Estonia (AT, BG,

BE/LU, DE, DK, EL, ES, FR, HR, HU, IE, IT 

26)

,

LT, NL, PT, RO, SE, SK, SI, UK-GB and UK-NI)

confirmed having a default nomination rule

agreed for this case with the adjacent TSO. Two

countries (CZ and PL) indicated no agreement

with adjacent TSO.

Mainly two default rules (“lesser rule” and

“zero”) are reported by 22 countries as a default

nomination rule. In the matching process at IPs

where both default rules are indicated by the ad-

jacent TSOs the application of the zero rule

would finally apply. In case of receiving no valid

nomination before the nomination deadline, the

TSO would apply zero for the shipper nomina-

tion in the matching process. Where the lesser

of rule applies in the matching process, no gas

flow would ultimately occur.

Exceptions are indicated by three countries (BG,

RO and IT 

27)

). Bulgaria and Romania which take

the last confirmed nomination into account at IP

Negru Voda 1 and by Italy where a weekly and

monthly planning is taken into account. In five

countries (BG 

28)

, CZ, EL, SK and PL) the default

nomination rules currently in place have yet to

be agreed for all IPs. (Details can be found in ta-

ble 3.5 in Annex III.

The interconnection points (IPs) where hourly

and daily nominations coexist in twelve coun-

tries (BE, CZ, DE, FR, HU, IT, LU, NL, PL, SI, SK

and UK-GB) can be found in

table 3.6 in Annex III .

Table 3.6 in Annex III also lists the countries

where NRAs have determined at hat the

nomination and renomination procedures are

required at points other than the IPs.

ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016 |

19