Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  103 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S90

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose or Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute and late

toxicities and biochemical disease-free survival and

overall survival after high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a

salvage modality for locally recurrent prostate

radiotherapy failure.

Material and Methods

Between 2007 and 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 20

consecutively patients. Median age of first treatment was

62 years (range 51-73). The majority of the patients in

this study (65%) were low risk. 5p received hormonal

blockade. 11p received treatment with low-dose-rate

brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and 9p received treatment with

external beam radiotherapy with median dose of 75Gy (70-

78Gy). Time to biochemical recurrence was 62 months

(range 14-119). Median presalvage PSA was 3.72 (range

1,83-12,29). After biochemical relapse, we confirm local

recurrence with biopsy. Patients received high-dose-rate

brachytherapy (HDR-BT). The schedule was three

implantations, every two weeks, with 10,5Gy per implant.

By the time of salvage BT, only 1p received ADT. Acute

and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were

graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse

Events (CTCv4.0). Overall survival (OS) and biochemical

(bDFS) control were calculated using Kaplan-Meier

method.

Results

After first treatment, acute toxicities consisted of

genitourinary toxicities grade 1 (3p) and grade 3 (1p). Not

late gastrointestinal toxicities.

After HDR-BT, acute toxicities consisted of genitourinary

grade 1 (4p), grade 2 (5p) and grade 3 (3p),

gastrointestinal toxicities grade 1 (3p) and grade 2 (4p)

and impotence in 4p. Not acute toxicities grade 4 were

reported.

Late toxicities consisted of genitourinary grade 3 were

observed in 2p. Not grade 4 complications.

With a median follow-up after salvage HDR-BT of 47

months (range 11-112 months), local control was achieved

on PSA levels in all patients.

Among 20 patients studied, 1 lost follow-up and he was

excluded from the survival analysis.

Using Kaplan-Meier analysis the 2-year and 5-year OS were

100% and 84,2%, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year

biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) were 85% and

81%, respectively.

Conclusion

Prostate BT is an effective salvage modality in some

selected prostate local recurrence patients after radiation

therapy.

HDR-BT is a good choice to deliver high-dose radiation in

prostate recurrence tumors after external beam

radiotherapy or LDR-BT. This treatment offers adequate

locoregional control with acceptable range of

complications.

OC-0176 Identifying Patients Who Benefit the Most

from Salvage HDR Brachytherapy

G. Valdes

1

, A.J. Chang

1

, O. Kenton

1

, A. Cunha

1

, T.D.

Solberg

1

, H. I-Chow

1

1

University of Californ ia UCSF, Radiation Oncology, San

Francisco CA, U SA

Purpose or Objective

To use mac hine learning to better identify patients that

could benefit from prostate salvage HDRB (HDR

brachytherapy).

Material and Methods

Data was analyzed for

52 consecutively accrued patients

that underwent salvage HDRB between 1998 and 2009 for

locally recurrent prostate cancer following previous

definitive radiation therapy at the University of California,

San Francisco (UCSF). All patients were treated with 36

Gy in 6 fractions after pathologic confirmation of locally

recurrent disease without evidence of metastatic

disease. Determination of biochemical failure after

salvage HDRB was based on the Phoenix definition. All

non-failure patients were followed for a minimum of 5

years. Eighteen different clinical risk features were

collected from each patient. Machine Learning was used

to identify subpopulations that would most likely to

remain biochemically disease free after the

treatment. Decision tree algorithms were constructed

using Matlab R 2011a. The complexity of the decision tree

was fine-tuned by selecting the optimum number of

observations per terminal node that minimized

the “Leave One Out Cross-Validation” estimation of the

deviance. Results were compared to those obtained using

Ensemble Methods. Random permutation experiments

were also performed to estimate the probability that the

tree found was the result of random variations.

Results

A subpopulation of patients with a high risk of biochemical

failure after salvage HDRB was identified. Those patients

with a fraction of positive nodes from those sample that

was greater than 0.354 and disease free interval less than

4.12 years had a failure rate after salvage HDRB of 0.75 vs

0.38 for the remainder of the population,

Figure 1

. The

probability that the conclusions reached in this paper are

not due to random fluctuations is 0.7,

Figure 2

.

Figure1.

The Optimal Decision Tree obtained for

predicting failure after Salvage HDRB.

Figure 2.

Random permutation of output labels. 1000

iterations were created in each case were the outcome of

was randomly permuted. Not correlation between

features and outcome should be present in this case. The

probability of obtaining a cross-validated leave one out

error smaller than the one obtained by the tree in Figure

1 was calculated.

Conclusion

Patients with a fraction of positive nodes higher than 0.35

and a disease free interval bigger than 4.12 years are at

higher risk of biochemical failure after salvage HDBR.

Machine Learning is effective in identify subtle variables

that can affect the treatment outcome.