Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S91

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Proffered Papers: Breast

OC-0177 Brachytherapy for the Palliation of Dysphagia

Owing to Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

L. Fuccio

1

, D. Mandolesi

1

, A. Farioli

1

, C. Hassan

2

, L.

Frazzoni

1

, A. Guido

3

, F. Violante

1

, C. Pierantoni

1

, A.

Galuppi

3

, F. Bazzoli

1

, A. Repici

4

, A. Morganti

3

1

S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Department of

Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy

2

Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Gastroenterology

Unit, Rome, Italy

3

S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Radiation

Oncology Unit, Bologna, Italy

4

Humanitas Research University Hospital, Endoscopy

Unit, Rozzano MI, Italy

Purpose or Objective

The management of dysphagia owing to eso phageal

cancer is challenging. Brachytherapy has been proposed as

an alternative option to stent placement. We performed a

systematic review to examine its efficacy and safety in the

resolution of dysphagia.

Material and Methods

Prospective studies recruiting at least 20 patients with

malignant dysphagia and published up to April 2016 were

eligible. The dysphagia-free survival (DFS) and adverse

event rates were pooled by means of a random effect

model.

Results

Six studies for a total of 9 treatment arms (623 patients)

were eligible for inclusion. After 1 month since treatment,

the DFS rate was 86.9% [95%CI: 76.0%–93.3%]; after 3

months, it was 67.2% [95%CI: 56.1%–76.7%]; after 6

months, it was 47.4% [95%CI: 38.5%–56.5%]; after 9

months, it was 37.6% [95%CI:30.0%–45.9%]; and, finally,

after 12 months, it was 29.4% [95%CI: 21.6%–38.7%]. The

heterogeneity between studies was high at 1-, 3- and 6-

month assessment; the values of I

2

were 86.3%, 80.0% and

57.8%, respectively. The meta-regression analysis showed

total radiation dose and number of fractions as the only

positively influencing factors. Severe adverse event rate

was 22.6% (95%CI 19.4–26.3). The main reported adverse

events were brachytherapy-related stenosis (12.2%) and

fistula development (8.3%). Two cases (0.3%) of deaths

were reported due to esophageal perforation.

Conclusion

Brachytherapy is a highly effective and relatively safe

treatment option therefore its underuse is no longer

justified. Further studies should investigate the optimal

radiation dose and number of fractions able to achieve the

highest DFS rates.

OC-0178 Demonstration of Catheter Insertion Using

Electromagnetic Guidance in Breast Brachytherapy

H. Brastianos

1

, T. Vaughan

2

, A. Lasso

2

, M. Westerland

1

, J.

Gooding

1

, T. Ungi

2

, G. Fichtinger

2

, C. Falkson

1

1

Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Radiation

Oncology, Kingston- Ontario, Canada

2

Queen's University, School of Computing, Kingston-

Ontario, Canada

Purpose or Objective

Accelerated partial breast irradiation using multi-catheter

interstitial brachytherapy may be used for early stage

breast cancers. To ensure ideal dosimetry over the tumor

bed, the catheters need to be placed in parallel with equal

spacing. The breast is a deformable organ; thus, placing

catheters in the correct position is challenging. To ensure

adequate spacing and position, we will apply real-time

electromagnetic guidance (EM) in combination with

ultrasound (US) to optimize the catheter insertions. This

study will discuss the use of electromagnetic tracking

catheter with ultrasound to insert catheters in phantoms.

Material and Methods

Anthropomorphic plastic phantoms were made with each

having a simulated tumor bed that can be visualized using

both ultrasound and CT. In the control, arm, the tumor is

identified using ultrasound and inserted under ultrasound

guidance.

A tissue-locking needle and US probe are equipped with a

real-time EM tracker. Under US guidance, the localization

needle is placed within the tumor bed, which provides a

rigid reference. The cavity is then contoured on US,

creating a model in a virtual view. An EM tracked needle

guide is pointed at the tumor bed and the catheter needle

is inserted through the guide into the tissue. Additional

parallel catheters are planned on the virtual view based

on the first insertion and implanted in the target. The

guidance software is built on the 3D Slicer

(www.slicer.org

) and SlicerIGT

(www.slicerigt.org)

open

source platforms.

In these experiments, a total of 10-15 catheters were

inserted in each of the six phantoms. The goal was to place

each catheter within the tumor bed. Three phantoms had

catheter needles inserted with ultrasound only, while the

other three had catheters inserted with combined EM

tracking and US guidance. All six insertions were

conducted by the same operator and the placement of the

catheters was determined with CT.

Results

Under US guidance only in the three phantoms, 17 out of

26 catheters passed through the tumor bed. The average

mean spacing was 0.86 cm +/- 0.33 cm. Under combined

EM tracking and US guidance, 35 out of 40 catheters

passed through the tumor bed. The average mean spacing

was 1.05 +/- 0.19 cm.

Conclusion

These phantom experiments verify that EM tracking can

be used to target catheter needles to the tumor bed.

Additional research is currently being performed to

translate this technique to patient trials.

OC-0179 Dosimetric impact of errors in HDR-iBT of the

breast using a catheter tracking method

M. Kellermeier

1

, B. Hofmann

1

, V. Strnad

1

, C. Bert

1

1

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen- Friedrich-Alexander-

Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Erlangen, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) was used to measure the

implant geometry in fractioned HDR interstitial

brachytherapy (iBT) of the breast. Based on the tracking

data the dosimetric impact of common clinical errors, e.g.

as reported in the United States by the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, were assessed using treatment planning

quality criteria (QC).

Material and Methods

For tracking of implant catheters, 28 patients were

accrued within an institutional review board-approved

study. The geometry of interstitial single-leader catheters

(median: 18 pcs) was tracked on the HDR treatment table

directly after each of the treatment fraction (up to nine

during five days). Tracking has been performed by manual

insertion of a small EMT sensor into each of the catheters.

The breathing motion was compensated by computing the

center of mass from three additional EMT sensors on the

breast. Taking the tracking-based catheter data, different

errors (swaps and shifts of catheters, changing the

tracking direction of catheters, i.e. tip-end swap) were

simulated.

For dose calculation, the dwell positions (DPs) were

determined along the catheter traces and the dwell times

were taken from the approved treatment plan. Common

contour-independent QC like the dose non-uniformity

ratio (DNR) were analyzed. For investigation of contour-

dependent QC, like the coverage index (CI) of the PTV, the

corresponding EMT-derived DPs were registered to the CT-