Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  607 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 607 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S591

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

a decrease in the cellularity in the tumour & tumour

response. Thus, a rising ADC value during treatment versus

Pretreatment ADC values may be used to predict

outcomes.

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of

diffusion weighted MRI derived parameters like ADC, as an

imaging biomarker, to predict response to RT in locally

advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and

hypopharynx.

Material and Methods

From May 2014 to August 2015, 19 patients with locally

advanced laryngeal & hypopharyngeal malignancies,

treated with organ preservation intent with concurrent

radiotherapy with Cisplatin (n=14), radiotherapy with

Nimotuzumab (n=2) and radical radiotherapy (n=3) were

recruited. The patients were all male with predominantly

T3 stage. They were assessed for treatment response with

dWMRI at baseline, first week, fourth week during RT and

at the time of first response assessment at 6 to 8 weeks

after RT. The ADC values were compared at different time

points and correlated with the treatment response.

Results

All the 19 patients in the study showed an increasing trend

in the ADC values over the chosen 4 different time points.

It was observed that an abrupt rise from the pretreatment

ADC to the first week ADC was characteristic of complete

response while a gradual rise of ADC over the different

points suggested a partial treatment response. The

patients who responded to chemoradiation therapy had a

higher pretreatment ADC than patients with partial

response. At the last follow up, 12 patients were disease

free, while 5 patients developed recurrence. Four patients

with recurrence had shown a partial response while only

one had exhibited a complete response during RT. One

patient died during treatment of aspiration pneumonia

while undergoing CRT & another did not follow up after

completion of treatment.

Conclusion

This study suggests that an abrupt rise in the ADC value in

the tumour after one week of treatment may predict

complete response & long term tumour control. However

this finding needs to be investigated in a larger cohort of

patients over a longer follow up before dWMRI can be

utilised in clinical practice.

EP-1076 toxicity of concomitant chemotherapy and

IMRT in locally advanced OPSCC: sequential vs SIB

technique

G. Abate

1

, F. De Felice

1

, A. Galdieri

1

, G. Gravina

2

, F.

Marampon

3

, D. Musio

1

, V. Tombolini

1

1

Policlinico Umberto I- “Sapienza” University of Rome,

radiotherapy, Roma, Italy

2

University of L'Aquila, Department of Biotechnological

and Applied Clinical Sciences- Laboratory of

Radiobiology, L'Aquila, Italy

3

University of L’Aquila-, Department of Biotechnological

and Applied Clinical Sciences- Laboratory of

Radiobiology, L'Aquila, Italy

Purpose or Objective

Concurrent radiochemotherapy is the standard of care for

locally advanced oropharingeal squamous cell carcinoma

(OPSCC) patients. Due to a substantial locoregional

recurrence rate especially in human papilloma virus (HPV)

negative disease, an improvement in treatment outcome

is desirable.

Treatment intensification with radiation dose escalation

could represent a valid option by applying accelerated

radiotherapy with higher dose for fraction and non-

uniform dose distribution with simultaneous integrated

boost (SIB). Even if radiobiological and clinical data

suggest that accelerated fractionation with higher dose

per fraction given in GTV may produce better locoregional

control, a higher toxicity is expected especially with

concomitant platinum 100 mg/mq based chemotherapy.

A comparison between sequential IMRT (S-IMRT) and SIB-

IMRT was planned. The aim was to evaluate the

tolerability and safety of SIB regimen in HPV negative

patients with locally advanced OPSCC

Material and Methods

Patients with histologically proven HPV negative OPSCC,

staged T3-4 with or without involved lymph nodes at

diagnosis, who received primary CRT, were included. S-

IMRT was defined as radiotherapy equivalent to 70 Gy (2

Gy/fraction). SIB-IMRT was administered to a total dose

of 67.5 Gy (2.25 Gy/fraction) to high dose volume and

60 (2 Gy/fraction) and 54 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) to high risk

and low risk volumesrespectively..

Fusion CT–MR imaging with a deformable registration

software was performed to accurately localize target

volumes and organs at risk.

Concomitant cisplatin (100mg/m2 on day 1 and day 22 day

of treatment) was used.

Results

A total of 46 patients (31 males, 15 females) with

a median age of 64 years (range 41-75) were examined

between February 2009 and March 2016. All patients

completed the programmed CRT treatment. No patients

suspended planned chemotherapy and all patients

received the IMRT prescribed total dose. No severe life

risking complications occurred and no significant

differences between S-IMRT and SIB-IMRT were observed

in term of major acute toxicities. Details are shown in

table 1

Conclusion

Our data shows that IMRT-SIB with 2.25 Gy/fraction with

concurrent platinum-100- based chemotherapy is a safe

treatment approach without increasing toxicities. This

regimen is therefore acceptable for the therapy of locally

advanced oropharyngeal cancer and patients with poor

prognosis as HPV negative OPSCC could benefit from it. A

longer follow up is needed to fully evaluate late toxicity

and survival.

EP-1077 Predictive modeling for radiation-induced

acute dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients.

D. Alterio

1

, M. Gerardi

1

, L. Cella

2

, V. D'Avino

2

, G. Palma

2

,

D. Ciardo

1

, E. Rondi

3

, A. Ferrari

1

, M. Muto

4

, R. Spoto

4

, R.

Pacelli

5

, R. Orecchia

6

, B. Jereczek

7

1

European Institute of Oncology, Radiation Oncology,

Milan, Italy

2

National Council of Research, Biostructures and

Bioimaging, Naples, Italy

3

European Institute of Oncology, Medical Physics, Milan,

Italy

4

European Institute of Oncology - University of Milan,

Radiation Oncology -Oncology and Hemato-oncology,

Milan, Italy

5

Federico II- University school of Medicine, Advanced

Biomedical Sciences, Naples, Italy

6

European Institute of Oncology - University of Milan,

Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences - Oncology and

Hemato-oncology, Milan, Italy

7

European Institute of Oncology - University of Milan,