Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  645 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 645 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S629

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

4

National Cancer Center, Study Coordination Section,

Chuo, Japan

5

National Cancer Center Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Chuo, Japan

6

Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Radiation

Oncology, Osakasayama, Japan

7

Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular

Diseases, Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan

8

Saitama Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Kitaadachi,

Japan

9

Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical

Science, Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima, Japan

10

Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Niigata, Japan

11

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Radiation

Oncology and Particle Therapy, Kashiwa, Japan

12

Shizuoka Cancer Center, Radiation and Proton Therapy

Center, Sunto, Japan

13

Graduate School of Medicine- Chiba University,

Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Chiba,

Japan

14

Hyogo Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Akashi,

Japan

15

Shikoku Cancer Center Hospital, Radiotherapy,

Matsuyama, Japan

16

Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Nagoya, Japan

17

The University of Tokyo Hospital, Radiology, Bunkyo,

Japan

18

Tochigi Cancer Center, Radiotherapy, Utsunomiya,

Japan

19

Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,

Radiation Oncology, Suita, Japan

20

Graduate School of Medicine- Kyoto University,

Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto,

Japan

21

Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious diseases

Center- Komagome Hospital, Radiology, Bunkyo, Japan

22

Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Radiation

Oncology, Shinjuku, Japan

23

University of Tsukuba, Radiation Oncology, Tsukiba,

Japan

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of short-course

hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HWBI) on

Japanese women after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), a

prospective single-arm confirmatory trial (JCOG0906,

UMIN000003200) has been conducted in 25 hospitals.

Material and Methods

Japanese women who had invasive breast cancer with

clinical tumor size of 3 cm or less, no or one to three

pathologically positive lymph nodes and pathologically

negative inked margin were prospectively registered after

BCS with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The HWBI of

42.56Gy/16fr was delivered to the whole-breast without

regional nodal irradiation, and a boost irradiation (BI) of

10.64Gy/4fr to the original tumor bed was added when the

surgical margin was 5 mm or less. The recommended

treatment period was within 29 days for HWBI and 33 days

for HWBI and BI. The primary endpoint was the proportion

of pre-specified eight items of grade 2 or higher late

adverse reactions (ARs) including telangiectasia,

ulceration, fibrosis-deep connective tissue, fracture,

pneumonitis, cardiac ischemia/infarction, pericardial

effusion and pain-breast occurring between 91 days and

three years from the start of HWBI. The sample size was

set as 310 patients with one-side alpha of 5%, power of

90%, threshold value of 8%, and expected value of 4%,

estimated from the proportion of the late ARs on the

historical control including 703 patients followed up for

three years or more after conventional fractionated

whole-breast irradiation (CWBI) in our pilot survey prior to

the present trial. Secondary endpoints included the

proportion of treatment completion within the

recommended period, early adverse events (AEs)

occurring during 90 days from the start of HWBI, overall

survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), ipsilateral-

breast relapse-free survival (IB-RFS), and the proportion

of breast cosmetic change. Early AEs and late ARs were

evaluated using CTCAE ver3.0. Survival time was

estimated by the Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

Between 2010 and 2012, 312 women were registered. 306

patients received HWBI and 66 patients received HWBI

with BI, but six chose CWBI prior to the start of irradiation.

301 patients (96.5%; 95%CI: 93.8-98.2) were treated within

the recommended period. Evaluation of early AEs found

that 38 patients (12.4%) had grade 2, including 25 patients

(8.2%) with radiation dermatitis, and no patients had

grade 3/4. On 306 patients receiving HWBI, 3-years OS,

DFS and IB-RFS were 99.7% (95%CI: 97.7-100), 95.7%

(95%CI: 92.7-97.5) and 99.0% (95%CI: 97.0-99.7). Among

303 (97%) patients, evaluation of late ARs found that 13

patients (4.3%; 90%CI: 2.6-6.7) had grade 2/3, including

one of grade 3 pneumonitis. None had grade 4 or

treatment-related death.

Conclusion

Short-course HWBI is considered as one of the standard

treatments for Japanese women with margin-negative

invasive breast cancer after BCS. Further follow-up is

continued and cosmetic outcome will be analyzed.

EP-1157 Serial changes of post-lumpectomy seroma

during MRI-guided partial breast irradiation

S.H. Jeon

1

, K.H. Shin

1

, S.Y. Park

1

, J.M. Park

1

1

Seoul National University Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Seoul, Korea Republic of

Purpose or Objective

After breast conserving surgery, the volume of post-

lumpectomy seroma changes by time. We analyzed serial

changes of seroma volume (SV) using magnetic resonance

image (MRI) to investigate the possible benefit of adaptive

radiation therapy during partial breast irradiation (PBI).

Material and Methods

From October 2015 to July 2016, 37 patients were

prospectively included in the study. A total dose of 38.5

Gy in 3.85 Gy fractions once daily was prescribed to the

planning target volume (PTV). The PTV was defined as

unequal margins of 1-1.5cm added according to the

directional safety margin status of each seroma.

Treatment was done using MRI-guided radiation therapy

(ViewRay system). During the 10 fractions of treatment,

MRI scans were acquired at the time of simulation, 1st,

6th and 10th fractions.

Results

The average time intervals of surgery-simulation,

simulation-1st, 1st-6th, and 6th-10th fractions were 23.1,

8.5, 7.2, and 5.9 days, respectively. SV was smaller during

treatment than at simulation in 34 patients. Mean SV

decreased from 100% at simulation to 65%, 55%, and 47%

at each MRI scan. Age, body mass index, tumor size,

seroma location, SV and delivery of radiotherapy did not

showed association with SV change (p>0.05, student’s t-

test). In 34 patients with decreased SV, mean PTVs were

84.7 cm

3

and 56.9 cm

3

at simulation and 6th fraction,

respectively, and their difference was proportional to SV

at simulation (r=0.832, p<0.001, pearson’s correlation

test).

Conclusion

During PBI, rate of SV change is associated with time

elapsed from surgery. Frequent monitoring of seroma

change with MRI seems helpful for all patients receiving

PBI.