Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  737 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 737 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S721

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

based SBRT was performed with Volumetric Modulated Arc

Therapy in its RapidArc form and flattening filter free

beams. The treatment schedule was 35 Gy in five fractions

delivered on alternate days. The PTV included the

prostate for low risk and prostate plus seminal vesicles for

intermediate risk, with a 5 mm margin in all other

directions. Toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE

criteria v4.0. Biochemical failure was calculated according

to the Phoenix definition. The Expanded Prostate Cancer

Index Composite questionnaire was used to record health-

related quality of life.

Results

From May 2012 to April 2016, 50 patients were enrolled.

Twenty-five patients were classified in low risk group and

25 in intermediate risk group. Mean age was 78 years old

(range 75 – 84); Gleason score was 6 in 26 and 7 in 24

patients. Median initial PSA was 6,43 (range 2,6 – 17).

Median follow-up was 26 months. Acute toxicity was mild.

Rectal toxicity was reported as grade 1 in 5 (10%) cases

and grade 2 in 1 (2%) cases; grade 1 and grade 2

genitourinary toxicity was described in 13 (26%) and 14

(28%) patients, respectively. In the late setting, 3 (6%)

patients reported rectal grade 1 toxicity. Genitourinary

late effects were reported as grade 1 in 13 (26%) patients

and grade 2 in 2 (4%) patient. Regarding outcome, median

nadir PSA was 0.51 ng/ml (range 0.01 – 3.12). Trend of PSA

is reported in Figure 1. No biochemical relapses were

observed during follow-up and all patients are alive at the

moment of the analysis.

Conclusion

Gantry-based SBRT with VMAT and FFFs can be considered

an effective, non-invasive and safe approach for elderly

patients affected by prostate cancer at low and

intermediate risk. Randomized trials comparing SBRT with

other approaches in this setting are necessary.

EP-1344 Long-term quality of life after high-dose-rate

brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer

W. Busser

1

, I. Korfage

2

, S. Aluwini

1

1

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,

Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2

Erasmus Medical Center, Public Health, Rotterdam, The

Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

Quality of life (QoL) of patients treated for prostate

cancer (PCa) is relevant because of the long survival of

these patients. We aimed to report late toxicity

incidences and generic and PCa-specific health-related

QoL and to investigate associations between toxicity and

QoL in patients treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy

(HDR-BT) boost combined with external beam

radiotherapy (EBRT).

Material and Methods

264 low- and intermediate risk PCa patients were treated

between 2000-2007 with single implant HDR-BT boost (3x6

Gy) combined with EBRT (25x1.8 Gy). Of these, 171

patients with QoL data available with 6-10 years follow-up

(FU) were included. Late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or

genitourinary (GU) toxicity was evaluated using physicians

charts and EORTC-RTOG toxicity questionnaire at 3, 6 and

12 months and yearly thereafter. The highest score of both

was used to identify toxicity.

Between

2010-2013,

validated

self-assessment

questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 for health-related QoL

and EORTC PR-25 for PCa-specific QoL, were yearly sent

to all patients. All C30 functioning domains, global health

and fatigue and pain symptoms were evaluated. The

evaluated PR25 domains were sexual activity and

functioning, urinary and bowel symptoms, and

incontinence aid use. Raw scores of each domain were

linearly transformed into 0-100 scales. Higher functional

scores indicate higher functioning and better QoL, while

higher symptom scores indicate lower QoL.

Patients with toxicity were compared to patients without

late toxicity. A multi-level linear model was used to

statistically assess the QoL differences between the 2

groups over 6-10 years FU. Covariates were included in the

analysis to control for their influence: age, PSA, prostate

volume and FU time. Clinical relevance of the differences

was assessed by means of the minimally important

difference (MID): toxicity group mean scores ≥0.5 standard

deviation different from the non-toxicity group, were

considered clinically relevantly different.

Results

Late grade ≥2 toxicity was reported by 79 patients (46.2%),

of whom 57 (33.3%) had GU and 30 (17.5%) had GI

symptoms. Of both C30 and PR25, 364 questionnaires were

analysed (mean 2.1 per patient).

Generic QoL (C30)domains did not show any statistically

significant differences (Table 1). PR25 PCa-specific QoL

for both urinary and bowel symptoms showed clinically

relevant worse QoL scores for patients with grade ≥2

toxicity (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). Of sexually

active patients, patients with toxicity reported better

sexual function (p=0.001); which was also clinically

relevant. The included covariates did not show any

associations

with

QoL

score

differences.

Conclusion

For patients treated with EBRT and HDR-BT boost, late

grade ≥2 toxicity was not associated with decreased QoL

for generic QoL domains, but associations between

toxicity and decreased PCa-specific QoL scores were

observed. The higher sexual functioning scores in the

toxicity group are hard to explain and worth more

investigation.

EP-1345 Dosimetric effect of seed-based prostate

localisation on Pelvic Lymph Nodes in High-Risk

Prostate Ca

R. Valentine

1

, E. Miguel Chumacero

2

1

NHS greater glasgow and clyde, Department of

Radiotherapy Physics, glasgow, United Kingdom

2

NHS greater glasgow and clyde- University of Glasgow,

Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Glasgow, United

Kingdom