Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  739 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 739 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S723

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

acute GI toxicity grade I was observed in 6 patients (17.1%)

and grade II in 3 patients (8.6%). No late grade III-IV GU or

GI toxicity was detected. For one patient a TURP was

planned at 8 months after treatment, for urethral

stricture.

Only 1 patient (3%) developed biochemical recurrence

after a follow-up of 27 months.

Conclusion

Hypo-RT (63,4 Gy/20 fractions) with a high equivalent BED

(EQD2Gy_tumor = 85 Gy) produces aceptable acute and

sub-acute toxicity rates with excellent outcomes of

biochemical control for intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Longer term follow-up should be analyzed to confirm

these data.

EP-1348 Set-up errors in prostate cancer radiotherapy

based on cone-beam computed tomography.

M. Trignani

1

, G. Caponigro

1

, M. Di Biase

1

, P. Bagalà

1

, M.D.

Falco

1

, A. Vinciguerra

1

, A. Augurio

1

, M. Di Tommaso

1

, L.

Caravatta

1

, D. Genovesi

1

1

Ospedale Clinicizzato S.S. Annunziata, Radiotherapy,

Chieti, Italy

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate set-up accuracy using cone-beam computed

tomography (CBCT) in patients with prostate cancer

receiving VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) or

IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy) techniques.

Material and Methods

From January 2015 to September 2016, 1199 CBCT

referred to 98 prostate cancer patients received radiation

treatment at our Institution using Elekta Synergy Agility

Linear Accelerator were acquired, recorded and

evaluated.

All patients underwent to planning computed tomography

(CT) in supine position; knees and ankles were placed in a

steady and comfortable position using a footrest. CT scans

with slices at 5 mm were acquired at 2 mm in condition of

fully bladder (0.75 liter of water, 45 minutes prior to CT

scan) and empty rectum. Planning CT was sent to

Oncentra Master Plan planning system and then via DICOM

to XVI software for co-registration with the CBCT scans.

For the CBCT acquisition we used the “pelvis M15”; the

Grey level algorithm was employed to obtain 3D-3D co-

registration with CT planning. An internal protocol was

adopted to reduce interfraction set-up errors and to

correct systematic errors. This protocol consisted in the

execution of 5 consecutively CBCT during first week of

treatment and once weekly CBCT during RT course. On the

basis of literature data an on-line correction protocol was

adopted: the tolerance level was 3 mm for translation

displacements and 3° for rotations; translation

displacements were applied in case of values >3 mm, while

for rotation >3° patients were repositioned. Then an

offline correction was applied with the mean of first 5

scans used to correct systematic errors with 3 mm. Means

(m) and standard deviations (SD) of all translational (x, y,

z) and rotational displacements were calculated in

relation to the first 5 and the following CBCTs. The

Wilxocon test was used to evaluate statistically significant

differences between displacements related to first 5

CBCTs and to the following CBCTs.

Results

Results are summarized in Table 1. Median values were <3

mm for all CBCTs, for both the first five and following

CBCTs, mean values were within 5mm. Greater shifts were

observed on z axis. Wilcoxon test showed a statistically

significant correlation only for the x (p value = 0.001).

Conclusion

In our study, we have analyzed translational set-up

uncertainties in prostate cancer treatments using CBCT

and we found that all the displacements were within 5

mm, well within the offset established. The action level

of 3 mm currently adopted at our center results safe and

it constitutes a good start point to reduce margin CTV-

PTV.

EP-1349 Adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy for

prostate cancer: acute toxicity

S. Saldi

1

, R. Bellavita

2

, I. Palumbo

3

, C. Mariucci

1

, E.

Arena

1

, M. Lupattelli

2

, M. Mendichi

1

, M. Tenti

1

, F.

Tamburi

2

, V. Bini

4

, C. Aristei

3

1

University of Perugia, Radiation Oncology Section,

Perugia, Italy

2

Perugia General Hospital, Radiation Oncology Section,

Perugia, Italy

3

University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital,

Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia, Italy

4

Perugia General Hospital, Internal Medicine Endocrin

and Metabolic Sciences Section, Perugia, Italy

Purpose or Objective

To

evaluate

acute

toxicity

and

preliminary outcome of hypofractionated adjuvant

radiotherapy (Hypo-ART) with helical tomotherapy after

radical prostatectomy (RP).

Material and Methods

From February 2014 to July 2016, 30 prostate cancer

patients received Hypo-ART for pT2-3 N0-1 and/or

R1disease. Median age was 67 years (range 53-74). The

surgical Gleason score was: <7 in 8 patients (27%), 7 in 10

(33%) and >7 in 12 (40%). Before RP the median PSA was

7.74 (range: 1.13-44.48) which dropped to 0.025 ng/ml

(range: 0 -0.53) before Hypo-ART. RT schedule: all 30

patients received 2.25 Gy in 29 fractions (total dose: 65.25

Gy) to the prostate/seminal vesicle bed; 15 (50%)

patients also received 1.8 Gy in 29 fractions to the pelvic

lymph nodes (total dose: 52.2 Gy). A simultaneous

integrated boost (SIB) technique was used. Hormone

therapy (LHRH analogue and/or anti-androgen) was

administered to 15 (50%) patients with high risk features.

Toxicity was graded according to the Common

Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version v4.0.

Biochemical failure was defined by ASTRO criteria. The

Kaplan-Meier method determined time-to-acute toxicity

events. The Mann-Whitney tested compared clinical and

dosimetric variables in groups with and without acute

toxicity.

Results

Median follow-up was 26.5 months (range: 3-31). The

median duration of HT was 21 months (range 4-33). Only

G1-G2 acute genitourinary (GU) and intestinal (GI)

toxicities occurred. Acute grade 1 GU toxicity occurred in

14/30 patients (56%), with 13 (43%) developing cystitis and

1 (3%) hematuria. Acute grade 2 GU toxicity (cystitis)

developed in 3/30 (10%) patients, with 1 also affected by

urinary retension (3%). Acute grade 1 GI toxicity (proctitis)

occurred in 14/30 patients (47%), which was associated

with rectal bleeding in 2 (7%) and diarrhoea in 5 (17%).

Acute grade 2 GI toxicity (proctitis) developed in 3/30

(10%) patients, which was associated with rectal bleeding

in 1 (3%) and diarrhoea in 1 (3%). Post Hypo-ART the

median PSA was 0.01 ng/ml (range:0-0.22) and the nadir

was 0.005 ng/ml (range: 0-0.2). At the last follow-up

no patient presented evidence of biochemical or loco-

regional recurrence. The probability of developing acute

GU on day 44 and GI toxicity on day 43 was 50% (95% CI 41-

46; 95% CI 39-46 respectively ). No differences emerged in

clinical and dosimetric variables in group with or without

acute toxicity.

Conclusion

These results suggest that moderate Hypo -ART is safe,

effective and well-tolerated. A longer follow-up is needed

to assess late toxicity and disease-free survival.