Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  875 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 875 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S859

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

assessed according to CTCAE v4.0 at baseline and weekly

during RT. Four endpoints were considered: mean grade

(G) ≥1.5 and G≥3 oral mucositis (OM), G3 dysphagia and

G≥2 salivary dysfunction (SD). The selected OARs were:

oral cavity (OC) and parotid glands (PG) considered as a

single organ for OM and SD; OC, pharyngeal constrictor

muscles (PCM), supraglottic and glottic larynx (GL) for

dysphagia. DVHs were reduced to Equivalent Uniform Dose

(EUD): for each OAR the best volume parameter n was

determined through numerical optimization. When this

procedure did not converge, we chose to evaluate DVH

cutpoint through t-test. EUD was inserted into a

multivariable logistic (ML) model together with

clinical/treatment features; variables selection was

guided by LASSO. Goodness of fit was evaluated with

Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plot.

Results

Data were collected for 132 pts. MeanG≥1.5 and G≥3 OM

were reported in 40 pts (30%), G3 dysphagia in 50 (38%)

and G≥2 SD in 90 (68%). ML models (figures 1-2) consisted

in: a single variable for meanG≥1.5 OM, i.e. OC EUD with

n=1 (mean dose) (OR=1.07); 3 variables for G≥3 OM

including OC EUD with n=0.05 (OR=1.02), PG EUD with n=1

(OR=1.06), BMI≥30 (OR=3.8, obese pts); 3 variables for

dysphagia including PCM V50Gy (OR=1.02), GL and OC EUD

with n=0.35 and 0.15 respectively (OR=1.02 and 1.04); 4

variables for SD including PG D98% (OR=1.04), OC EUD with

n=0.05 (OR=1.11), age (OR=1.08, 5-year intervals), smoke

(OR=1.37, yes vs no). Calibration was good in all cases.

Conclusion

OC resulted to be a parallel organ for mean G≥1.5 OM,

while severe OM was associated to a synergic effect

between PG mean dose and high doses received by small

OC volumes, with BMI acting as a dose-modifying factor.

On the other hand, OC resulted as a fairly serial organ for

G≥2 SD; this could be due to the inclusion of minor salivary

glands in OC contour, that the target often overlaps. Older

age and smoking history were also associated to a SD

increased risk. We did not find a strictly significant

association between G3 dysphagia and dosimetric

features, but the step trend resulting from our model

calibration suggests that the ML model may not describe

well the dose-response relationship in this case, with a

step function possibly being more suitable. Validation of

these models in a larger pts cohort is ongoing.