Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  876 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 876 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S860

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

EP-1595 NTCP models for early toxicities in patients

with prostate or brain tumours receiving proton therapy

A. Dutz

1,2

, L. Agolli

1,3

, E.G.C. Troost

1,2,3,4,5

, M.

Krause

1,2,3,4,5

, M. Baumann

1,2,3,4,5

, A. Lühr

1,2,3,4

, S. Löck

1,3,5

1

OncoRay - Center for Radiation Research in Oncology,

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav

Carus- Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,

Germany

2

Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of

Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany

3

Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine

and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische

Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

4

German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Heidelberg and

German Cancer Consortium DKTK partner site Dresden,

Dresden, Germany

5

National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site

Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Purpose or Objective

To identify patients who are likely to benefit most from

proton therapy, based on the potential reduction in

normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) compared

to photon therapy. The NTCP models required for this

comparison were developed using clinical data on early

side effects for patients with brain or prostate cancer

having received proton therapy.

Material and Methods

Eighty patients with primary brain tumours and 30 patients

with adenocarcinoma of the prostate who received proton

therapy were included in this study. For the brain tumour

patients, the radiation-induced early toxicities alopecia,

erythema, pain and fatigue were considered, while for

prostate cancer proctitis, diarrhoea, urinary frequency,

urgency and incontinence, obstructive symptoms and

radiation-induced cystitis were investigated. The

occurrence of these side effects was correlated with

different dose-volume parameters of associated organs at

risk. NTCP models were created using logistic regression.

A retrospective comparative treatment planning study was

conducted to predict the potential reduction in NTCP of

proton therapy compared to volumetric modulated arc

therapy using the created models. For patients with brain

tumours different subgroups were defined to identify

patient groups which show a particularly high reduction in

the considered toxicities.

Results

For patients with primary brain tumours significant

correlations between the occurrence of alopecia grade 2

as well as erythema grade ≥ 2 and the dose-volume

parameters D5% and V25Gy of the skin were found. Plan

comparison showed an average reduction in NTCP for

alopecia grade 2 of more than 5 % (see figure) and for

erythema grade ≥ 2 of about 5 % using proton therapy. For

patients with a brain tumour located in the skull base,

with a clinical target volume less than 115 cm³ or with a

prescribed dose less than 60 Gy, a potential reduction in

NTCP for alopecia grade 2 of about 10 % could be achieved.

For patients with prostate cancer significant correlations

between obstructive symptoms grade ≥ 1 and the dose

parameter D30% of the bladder as well as radiation-

induced cystitis grade ≥ 1 and D20% of the bladder were

found. Plan comparison showed an average reduction in

NTCP for obstructive symptoms ≥ grade 1 of about 25 %

and for radiation-induced cystitis about 15 % using proton

therapy.

Conclusion

We found significant correlations between the occurence

of early toxicities and dose-volume parameters of

associated organs at risk for patients with primary brain

tumours or prostate cancer receiving proton therapy. A

reduction of NTCP could be predicted for proton therapy

based on comparative treatment planning. After

validation, these results may be used to identify patients

who are likely to benefit most from proton therapy, as

suggested by the model-based approach [1].

[1] Langendijk JA et al. (2013) Radiother Oncol 107, 267 -

273.

EP-1596 Developing and validating a survival prediction

model for NSCLC patients using distributed learning

A. Jochems

1

, T. Deist

1

, I. El-Naqa

2

, M. Kessler

2

, C. Mayo

2

,

J. Reeves

2

, S. Jolly

2

, M. Matuszak

2

, R. Ten Haken

2

, J. Van

Soes

1

, C. Oberije

1

, C. Faivre-Finn

3

, G. Price

3

, P. Lambin

1

,

A. Dekker

1

1

MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy, Maastricht, The

Netherlands

2

University of Michigan, Radiation oncology, Ann-Arbor,

USA

3

The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic

Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

The golden standard for survival prediction in NSCLC

patients, the TNM stage system, is of limited quality for

patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy[1]. In this work,

we develop an up-to-date predictive model for survival

prediction based on a large volume of patients using a big

data distributed learning approach. Distributed learning is

defined as learning from multiple patient datasets without

these data leaving their respective hospitals.

Furthermore, we compare performance of our model to a

TNM stage based model. We demonstrate that the TNM

stage system performs poorly on the validation cohorts,

whereas our model performs significantly above the

chance level.

Material and Methods

Clinical data from 1299 lung cancer patients, treated with

curative intent with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiotherapy

(RT) alone were collected and stored in 3 different cancer

institutes. Two-year post-treatment survival was chosen

as the endpoint. Data from two institutes (1152 patients

at Institute 1 and 147 at Institute 2) was used to develop

the model while data from the 3

rd

institute (207 patients

at Institute 3) was used for model validation.

A Bayesian network model using clinical and dosimetric

variables was adapted for distributed learning (watch the

animation: link censored). The Institute 1 cohort data is

publicly available at (link censored) and the developed

models can be found at (link censored).

Results

A Bayesian network (BN) structure was determined based

on expert advice and can be observed in figure 1. Variables

included in the final model were TNM stage, age,