Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  882 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 882 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S866

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

radiation track structure. We suggest that this is as a

direct consequence of the complexity of the breaks

caused, as similar trends are observed for both repair and

break induction. This is of relevance for potential

application to LET based treatment plans.

EP-1605 Deep learning of radiomics features for

survival prediction in NSCLC and Head and Neck

carcinoma

A. Jochems

1

, F. Hoebers

1

, D. De Ruysscher

1

, R.

Leijenaar

1

, S. Walsh

1

, B. O'Sullivan

2

, J. Bussink

3

, R.

Monshouwer

3

, R. Leemans

4

, P. Lambin

1

1

MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy, Maastricht, The

Netherlands

2

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Cancer Clinical

Research Unit, Toronto, Canada

3

Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radiation

Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

4

VU University Medical Center, Department of

Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

In order to facilitate personalized medicine in cancer

care, predictive models are of vital importance.

Radiomics, the high-throughput extraction of large

amounts of image features from radiographic images,

facilitates predictive model development by providing

non-invasive biomarkers. Previous work indicates that

radiomics features have high predictive quality

1

. However,

these studies used conventional models and the added

value of deep learning combined with radiomics features

is unexplored. Furthermore, conventional modelling

strategies require a selection of features to establish a

signature whereas deep learning algorithms do not. In this

work we learn a deep learning model on radiomics

features and compare it to a previously published cox

regression model

1

.

Material and Methods

4 independent Lung and Head & Neck (H&N) cancer

cohorts (1418 total patients) were used in this study.

Radiomic features were extracted from the pre-treatment

computed tomography images. The model was learned on

the Institute 1 lung cohort (N=422) and validated on the

other datasets. The outcome is two-year survival following

treatment. A 3 layer deep learning network was used to

make predictions.

Results

Validation on Institute 2 dataset (N=154) yields an AUC of

0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.8) for the deep learning network and

0.66 on the conventional model (95% CI: 0.56-0.75). The

difference is not significant (P=0.11). Validation on

Institute 3 dataset (N=95) yields an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI:

0.53-0.79) for the deep learning network and 0.75 on the

conventional model (95% CI: 0.64-0.86). The difference is

not significant (P=0.19). Validation on Institute 4 dataset

(N=136) yields an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.8) for the

deep learning network and 0.74 on the conventional model

(95% CI: 0.64-0.83). The difference is not significant (P =

0.24). Validation on Institute 5 dataset (N=540) yields an

AUC of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) for the deep learning

network and 0.65 on the conventional model (95% CI: 0.59-

0.70). The difference is not significant (P = 0.10).

Figure 1: ROC curves of the model validation.

Conclusion

The combination of deep learning and radiomics features

has similar performance to conventional radiomics

modelling strategies. However, feature selection is no

longer a required component as all features can be

included in the network. This is a major advantage as

feature selection is a computationally intractable task for

which only heuristic solutions exist.

References

1 Aerts, H. et al,

Nat. Commun.

2014

,

5

, 4006.

EP-1606 Calculating ion-induced cell death and

chromosome damage by the BIANCA biophysical model

M.P. Carante

1,2

, F. Ballarini

1,2

1

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare INFN, Section of

Pavia, Pavia, Italy

2

University of Pavia, Physics Department, Pavia, Italy

Purpose or Objective

To calculate probabilities of cell death and chromosome

aberrations following cell irradiation with ion beams of

different energy.

Material and Methods

A biophysical model called BIANCA (BIophysical ANalysis of

Cell death and chromosome Aberrations) [Carante M.P.

and Ballarini F.

Front. Oncol.

6:76 2016] was refined and

applied to simulate cell death and chromosome

aberrations by therapeutic protons and heavier ions. The

model, which assumes a pivotal role for DNA cluster

damage, is based on the following assumptions: i) a DNA

“Cluster Lesion” (CL) produces two independent

chromosome fragments; ii) chromosome fragment un-

rejoining, or distance-dependent mis-rejoining

,

gives rise

to chromosome aberrations; iii) certain aberrations

(dicentrics, rings and large deletions) lead to cell death.

The CL yield is an adjustable parameter, as well as the

probability that a chromosome fragment remains un-

rejoined even if possible partners for rejoining are

present. The model, implemented as a MC code providing

simulated dose-response curves comparable with

experimental data, was applied to different beams,

including beams available at the CNAO hadrontherapy

centre in Pavia, Italy, and at the CATANA facility in

Catania, Italy.

Results

The model allowed reproduction of experimental survival

curves for cell lines characterized by different

radiosensitivity, supporting the model assumptions.

Furthermore, cell death and chromosome aberrations