Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  939 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 939 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S923

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Fig 2.

ADC in prostate and dose painted prostate for

C

im

scenario.

Conclusion

Gleason driven dose painting for prostate cancer using

ADC-MRI is feasible to reduce the average dose. The

reduction in dose is strongly dependent on the minimum

dose assigned to voxels with

G

<6.

EP-1690 Validating the robustness of PET features in a

phantom in a multicenter setting

T. Konert

1

, M. La Fontaine

2

, S. Van Kranen

2

, W. Vogel

1

, J.

Van de Kamer

2

, J.J. Sonke

2

1

Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Hospital, Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

2

Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

PET features may have prognostic or predictive value and

could therefore assist treatment decisions. However, PET

features are sensitive to differences in data collection,

reconstruction settings, and image analysis. It is

insufficiently known which features are least affected by

these differences, especially in a multicenter setting.

Therefore, this study investigates the robustness of PET

features in a phantom after repeated measurements

(repeatability), due to varying scanner type

(reproducibility) and their dependence on binning method

and SUV activity.

Material and Methods

PET scans from a NEMA image quality phantom were used

for assessment of PET feature robustness. Scans were

acquired on a Philips, a Siemens and a GE scanner from

three medical centers (see figure 1 and table 1 for more

details). Per sphere, a VOI was created by applying a

threshold of 40% of the SUV

max

. Per VOI, 10 first order

statistics and 10 textural features, often reported in

literature, were extracted. Two common implementations

of image pre-processing, before feature extraction, were

compared: using a fixed bin size (SUV = 1) versus a number

of fixed bins (64 bins). To examine the feature

repeatability, measurements were repeated two or three

times on the same scanner. The reproducibility was

assessed in images by comparing all scanners. The degree

of variation was calculated per VOI with the coefficient of

repeatability (1.96 x SD/mean), normalized to a

percentage (CR

%

). Features were seen as robust with a CR

< 30%, matching the level of uncertainty found in response

of PERCIST criteria. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used

to estimate the significance of differences due to binning

method and p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

For an overview of the results, see Table 1. The CR

%

of

SUV

max

in all scans depended on sphere volume, and

ranged from 1.1% (largest sphere) to 15.2% (smallest

sphere). In the repeatability study, 9 out of 10 PET

features were robust with 64 bins in more than one

scanner, and significantly higher (p < 0.05) when

compared to using a fixed bin size, where 7 out of 10 PET

features were robust. Reproducibility was achieved in 3

out of 10 PET features when 64 bins were used. PET

features were not reproducible when using a fixed bin

size.

Dissimilarity (CR

%

: 6.3-24.9), homogeneity 1 (CR

%

:

16.9-22.5), and inertia (CR

%

: 10.2-22.5) were robust to

binning method, scanner type, and SUV activity.

Coarseness, contrast, busyness, energy, correlation were

not robust (CR

%

> 30%).

Conclusion

This study indicates that not all PET features are robust in

a multicenter setting. Care has to be taken in feature

selection and binning method, especially if harmonization

of methods across centers is not accomplished.

Dissimilarity, homogeneity 1, and inertia seem robust and

promising PET features for use in a multicenter setting.

Use of fixed bin size should be avoided.

EP-1691 Multi-modal voxel-based correlation between

DCE-CT/MRI and DWI in metastatic brain cancer

C. Coolens

1,2,3

, W. Foltz

1,4

, N. Sinno

1

, C. Wang

1

, B.

Driscoll

1

, C. Chung

2,5

1

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health

Network, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada

2

University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Toronto,

Canada

3

University of Toronto, Radiation Oncology and IBBME,

Toronto, Canada

4

University of Toronto, Radiation Oncology, Toronto,

Canada

5

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology,

Houston, USA

Purpose or Objective

Quantitative model-based measures of dynamic contrast

enhanced (DCE) and Diffusion Weighted (DW) MRI

parameters have shown variable findings to-date that may

reflect variability in the MR acquisition and analysis. This

work investigates the use of a voxel-based, multi-modality

GPU architecture to include various complimentary solute

transport processes into a common framework and